EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefan Thater
dblp:67/257
· DBLP profile ↗
25ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 24 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 26% Information extraction and text analysis · 26% Vision and language · 23% | |
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Logic in computer science · 64% Automata and formal languages · 21% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Event participant modelling with neural networks · EMNLP 2016 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
video captioning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language generation
vision-to-language translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions · ICCV 2013 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity linking
entity disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Robust Disambiguation of Named Entities in Text · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Robust Disambiguation of Named Entities in Text · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
distributional semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Contextualizing Semantic Representations Using Syntactically Enriched Vector Models · ACL 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Contextualizing Semantic Representations Using Syntactically Enriched Vector Models · ACL 2010 |
Logic in computer science
semantics |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance Constraints: Translation, Evaluation, and Analysis · ACL 2004 Bridging the Gap Between Underspecification Formalisms: Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance Constraints · ACL 2003 |
Logic in computer science › semantics
underspecified semantics |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance Constraints: Translation, Evaluation, and Analysis · ACL 2004 Bridging the Gap Between Underspecification Formalisms: Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance Constraints · ACL 2003 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms
exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Efficient Solving and Exploration of Scope Ambiguities · ACL 2005 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
activity recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Translating Video Content to Natural Language Descriptions · ICCV 2013 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
constraint solving |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Bridging the Gap Between Underspecification Formalisms: Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance Constraints · ACL 2003 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
surface realisation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Generating with a Grammar Based on Tree Descriptions: a Constraint-Based Approach · ACL 2001 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Generating with a Grammar Based on Tree Descriptions: a Constraint-Based Approach · ACL 2001 |
Programming languages and type systems
grammar engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Generating with a Grammar Based on Tree Descriptions: a Constraint-Based Approach · ACL 2001 |
Programming languages and type systems › grammar formalisms
tree adjoining grammar |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Generating with a Grammar Based on Tree Descriptions: a Constraint-Based Approach · ACL 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
role-labeled text · 0.2probabilistic modeling · 0.2neural network · 0.2statistical machine translation · 0.2conditional random field · 0.2underspecified representation · 0.2vector space model · 0.1syntactic enrichment · 0.1formal grammar · 0.1dominance graph · 0.1constraint-based generation · 0.1chart representation · 0.1axiomatic generation · 0.1minimal recursion semantics translation · 0.0dominance constraints · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | MCScript: A Novel Dataset for Assessing Machine Comprehension Using Script Knowledge
Simon Ostermann 0002, Ashutosh Modi, Michael Roth 0001, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal |
LREC | 4 |
| 2018 | Mapping Texts to Scripts: An Entailment Study
Simon Ostermann 0002, Hannah Seitz, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal |
LREC | 3 |
| 2016 | Event participant modelling with neural networksabstractA common problem in cognitive modelling is lack of access to accurate broad-coverage models of event-level surprisal.As shown in, e.g., Bicknell et al. (2010), event-level knowledge does affect human expectations for verbal arguments.For example, the model should be able to predict that mechanics are likely to check tires, while journalists are more likely to check typos.Similarly, we would like to predict what locations are likely for playing football or playing flute in order to estimate the surprisal of actually-encountered locations.Furthermore, such a model can be used to provide a probability distribution over fillers for a thematic role which is not mentioned in the text at all.To this end, we train two neural network models (an incremental one and a non-incremental one) on large amounts of automatically rolelabelled text.Our models are probabilistic and can handle several roles at once, which also enables them to learn interactions between different role fillers.Evaluation shows a drastic improvement over current state-of-the-art systems on modelling human thematic fit judgements, and we demonstrate via a sentence similarity task that the system learns highly useful embeddings. Ottokar Tilk, Vera Demberg, Asad B. Sayeed, Dietrich Klakow, Stefan Thater |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2016 | Unsupervised Ranked Cross-Lingual Lexical Substitution for Low-Resource Languages
Stefan Ecker, Andrea Horbach, Stefan Thater |
LREC | 3 |
| 2016 | A Corpus of Literal and Idiomatic Uses of German Infinitive-Verb Compounds
Andrea Horbach, Andrea Hensler, Sabine Krome, Jakob Prange, Werner Scholze-Stubenrecht, Diana Steffen, Stefan Thater, Christian Wellner, Manfred Pinkal |
LREC | 7 |
| 2016 | Improving POS Tagging of German Learner Language in a Reading Comprehension Scenario
Lena Keiper, Andrea Horbach, Stefan Thater |
LREC | 3 |
| 2016 | A Crowdsourced Database of Event Sequence Descriptions for the Acquisition of High-quality Script Knowledge
Lilian Wanzare, Alessandra Zarcone, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal |
LREC | 3 |
| 2014 | What Substitutes Tell Us - Analysis of an "All-Words" Lexical Substitution CorpusabstractWe present the first large-scale English "allwords lexical substitution" corpus.The size of the corpus provides a rich resource for investigations into word meaning.We investigate the nature of lexical substitute sets, comparing them to WordNet synsets.We find them to be consistent with, but more fine-grained than, synsets.We also identify significant differences to results for paraphrase ranking in context reported for the SEMEVAL lexical substitution data.This highlights the influence of corpus construction approaches on evaluation results. Gerhard Kremer, Katrin Erk, Sebastian Padó, Stefan Thater |
EACL | 4 |
| 2013 | Translating Video Content to Natural Language DescriptionsabstractHumans use rich natural language to describe and communicate visual perceptions. In order to provide natural language descriptions for visual content, this paper combines two important ingredients. First, we generate a rich semantic representation of the visual content including e.g. object and activity labels. To predict the semantic representation we learn a CRF to model the relationships between different components of the visual input. And second, we propose to formulate the generation of natural language as a machine translation problem using the semantic representation as source language and the generated sentences as target language. For this we exploit the power of a parallel corpus of videos and textual descriptions and adapt statistical machine translation to translate between our two languages. We evaluate our video descriptions on the TACoS dataset, which contains video snippets aligned with sentence descriptions. Using automatic evaluation and human judgments we show significant improvements over several baseline approaches, motivated by prior work. Our translation approach also shows improvements over related work on an image description task. Marcus Rohrbach, Ivan Titov 0001, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal, Bernt Schiele |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2013 | Grounding Action Descriptions in VideosabstractRecent work has shown that the integration of visual information into text-based models can substantially improve model predictions, but so far only visual information extracted from static images has been used. In this paper, we consider the problem of grounding sentences describing actions in visual information extracted from videos. We present a general purpose corpus that aligns high quality videos with multiple natural language descriptions of the actions portrayed in the videos, together with an annotation of how similar the action descriptions are to each other. Experimental results demonstrate that a text-based model of similarity between actions improves substantially when combined with visual information from videos depicting the described actions. Michaela Regneri, Marcus Rohrbach, Dominikus Wetzel, Stefan Thater, Bernt Schiele, Manfred Pinkal |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 4 |
| 2012 | A comparison of models of word meaning in context
Georgiana Dinu, Stefan Thater, Sören Laue |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2011 | Robust Disambiguation of Named Entities in Text
Johannes Hoffart, Mohamed Amir Yosef, Ilaria Bordino, Hagen Fürstenau, Manfred Pinkal, Marc Spaniol, Bilyana Taneva, Stefan Thater, Gerhard Weikum |
EMNLP | 8 |
| 2011 | Word Meaning in Context: A Simple and Effective Vector Model
Stefan Thater, Hagen Fürstenau, Manfred Pinkal |
IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Computing Weakest Readings
Alexander Koller, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 2 |
| 2010 | Contextualizing Semantic Representations Using Syntactically Enriched Vector Models
Stefan Thater, Hagen Fürstenau, Manfred Pinkal |
ACL | 1 |
| 2010 | Underspecified computation of normal formsabstractWe show how to compute readings of ambiguous natural language sentences that are minimal in some way. Formally, we consider the problem of computing, out of a set C of trees and a rewrite system R, those trees in C that cannot be rewritten into a tree in C. We solve the problem for sets of trees that are described by semantic representations typically used in computational linguistics, and a certain class of rewrite systems that we use to approximate entailment, and show how to compute the irreducible trees efficiently by intersecting tree automata. Our algorithm solves the problem of computing weakest readings that has been open for 25 years in computational linguistics. Alexander Koller, Stefan Thater |
RTA | 2 |
| 2009 | Assessing the impact of frame semantics on textual entailmentabstractAbstract In this article, we underpin the intuition that frame semantic information is a useful resource for modelling textual entailment. To this end, we provide a manual frame semantic annotation for the test set used in the second recognizing textual entailment (RTE) challenge – the FrameNet-annotated textual entailment (FATE) corpus – and discuss experiments we conducted on this basis. In particular, our experiments show that the frame semantic lexicon provided by the Berkeley FrameNet project provides surprisingly good coverage for the task at hand. We identify issues of automatic semantic analysis components, as well as insufficient modelling of the information provided by frame semantic analysis as reasons for ambivalent results of current systems based on frame semantics. Aljoscha Burchardt, Marco Pennacchiotti, Stefan Thater, Manfred Pinkal |
Nat. Lang. Eng. | 3 |
| 2008 | Regular Tree Grammars as a Formalism for Scope Underspecification
Alexander Koller, Michaela Regneri, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 3 |
| 2006 | An Improved Redundancy Elimination Algorithm for Underspecified RepresentationsabstractWe present an efficient algorithm for the redundancy elimination problem: Given an underspecified semantic representation (USR) of a scope ambiguity, compute an USR with fewer mutually equivalent readings. The algorithm operates on underspecified chart representations which are derived from dominance graphs; it can be applied to the USRs computed by large-scale grammars. We evaluate the algorithm on a corpus, and show that it reduces the degree of ambiguity significantly while taking negligible runtime. Alexander Koller, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 2 |
| 2005 | Efficient Solving and Exploration of Scope Ambiguities
Alexander Koller, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 2 |
| 2004 | Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance Constraints: Translation, Evaluation, and AnalysisabstractWe show that a practical translation of MRS descriptions into normal dominance constraints is feasible. We start from a recent theoretical translation and verify its assumptions on the outputs of the English Resource Grammar (ERG) on the Redwoods corpus. The main assumption of the translation---that all relevant underspecified descriptions are nets---is validated for a large majority of cases; all non-nets computed by the ERG seem to be systematically incomplete. Ruth Fuchss, Alexander Koller, Joachim Niehren, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 4 |
| 2004 | A Relational Syntax-Semantics Interface Based on Dependency Grammar
Ralph Debusmann, Denys Duchier, Alexander Koller, Marco Kuhlmann, Gert Smolka, Stefan Thater |
COLING | 6 |
| 2003 | Bridging the Gap Between Underspecification Formalisms: Minimal Recursion Semantics as Dominance ConstraintsabstractMinimal Recursion Semantics (MRS) is the standard formalism used in large-scale HPSG grammars to model underspecified semantics. We present the first provably efficient algorithm to enumerate the readings of MRS structures, by translating them into normal dominance constraints. Joachim Niehren, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 2 |
| 2003 | Underspecification formalisms: Hole semantics as dominance constraints
Alexander Koller, Joachim Niehren, Stefan Thater |
EACL | 3 |
| 2001 | Generating with a Grammar Based on Tree Descriptions: a Constraint-Based ApproachabstractWhile the generative view of language processing builds bigger units out of smaller ones by means of rewriting steps, the axiomatic view eliminates invalid linguistic structures out of a set of possible structures by means of well formedness principles. We present a generator based on the axiomatic view and argue that when combined with a TAG-like grammar and a flat semantics, this axiomatic view permits avoiding drawbacks known to hold either of top-down or of bottom-up generators. Claire Gardent, Stefan Thater |
ACL | 2 |