Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eyal Shnarch
dblp:67/2631
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 19 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
13 papers |
Language models and text generation · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 24% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Machine learning and data management · 73% Information retrieval · 22% Knowledge graphs · 5% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Text Classification with Self-Training · EMNLP 2022 Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text Classification · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
long-form question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Achieving Human Parity in Content-Grounded Datasets Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Label-Efficient Model Selection for Text Generation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic data generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Achieving Human Parity in Content-Grounded Datasets Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Label-Efficient Model Selection for Text Generation · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Achieving Human Parity in Content-Grounded Datasets Generation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Corpus Wide Argument Mining - A Working Solution · AAAI 2020 GRASP: Rich Patterns for Argumentation Mining · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
decoding strategy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | The Benefits of Bad Advice: Autocontrastive Decoding across Model Layers · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
cold-start |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text Classification · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › unsupervised domain adaptation
self-training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Text Classification with Self-Training · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification › transfer learning for text classification
zero-shot text classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Text Classification with Self-Training · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model
BERT |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning and data management
active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical Study · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
argumentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network · ACL (1) 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › argumentation
argument convincingness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese Network · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Text Classification with Self-Training · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval
search engines |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Corpus Wide Argument Mining - A Working Solution · AAAI 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
semantic reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Semantic Inference at the Lexical-Syntactic Level · AAAI 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
textual entailment |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Instance-based Evaluation of Entailment Rule Acquisition · ACL 2007 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
semantic correspondence |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Lexical Reference: a Semantic Matching Subtask · EMNLP 2006 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph construction › knowledge extraction
wikipedia-based knowledge extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Extracting Lexical Reference Rules from Wikipedia · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sentence-level indexing · 0.9iterative annotation · 0.9active learning · 0.9large language model · 0.8label-efficient selection · 0.8layer-wise contrastive decoding · 0.7self-training · 0.6hyperparameter tuning · 0.6fine-tuning · 0.6clustering · 0.6empirical study · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Label-Efficient Model Selection for Text GenerationabstractShir Ashury Tahan, Ariel Gera, Benjamin Sznajder, Leshem Choshen, Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Shir Ashury-Tahan, Ariel Gera, Benjamin Sznajder, Leshem Choshen, Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2024 | Achieving Human Parity in Content-Grounded Datasets GenerationabstractThe lack of high-quality data for content-grounded generation tasks has been identified as a major obstacle to advancing these tasks. To address this gap, we propose Genie, a novel method for automatically generating high-quality content-grounded data.
It consists of three stages: (a) Content Preparation, (b) Generation: creating task-specific examples from the content (e.g., question-answer pairs or summaries). (c) Filtering mechanism aiming to ensure the quality and faithfulness of the generated data. We showcase this methodology by generating three large-scale synthetic data, making wishes, for Long-Form Question-Answering (LFQA), summarization, and information extraction. In a human evaluation, our generated data was found to be natural and of high quality. Furthermore, we compare models trained on our data with models trained on human-written data -- ELI5 and ASQA for LFQA and CNN-DailyMail for Summarization. We show that our models are on par with or outperforming models trained on human-generated data and consistently outperforming them in faithfulness. Finally, we applied our method to create LFQA data within the medical domain and compared a model trained on it with models trained on other domains. Asaf Yehudai, Boaz Carmeli, Yosi Mass, Ofir Arviv, Nathaniel Mills, Eyal Shnarch, Leshem Choshen |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2024 | Efficient Benchmarking (of Language Models)abstractYotam Perlitz, Elron Bandel, Ariel Gera, Ofir Arviv, Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch, Noam Slonim, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Leshem Choshen. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Yotam Perlitz, Elron Bandel, Ariel Gera, Ofir Arviv, Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch, Noam Slonim, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Leshem Choshen |
NAACL-HLT | 6 |
| 2023 | The Benefits of Bad Advice: Autocontrastive Decoding across Model LayersabstractAriel Gera, Roni Friedman, Ofir Arviv, Chulaka Gunasekara, Benjamin Sznajder, Noam Slonim, Eyal Shnarch. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Ariel Gera, Roni Friedman, Ofir Arviv, R. Chulaka Gunasekara, Benjamin Sznajder, Noam Slonim, Eyal Shnarch |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2022 | Cluster & Tune: Boost Cold Start Performance in Text ClassificationabstractEyal Shnarch, Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Eyal Shnarch, Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2022 | Zero-Shot Text Classification with Self-TrainingabstractRecent advances in large pretrained language models have increased attention to zero-shot text classification.In particular, models finetuned on natural language inference datasets have been widely adopted as zero-shot classifiers due to their promising results and offthe-shelf availability.However, the fact that such models are unfamiliar with the target task can lead to instability and performance issues.We propose a plug-and-play method to bridge this gap using a simple self-training approach, requiring only the class names along with an unlabeled dataset, and without the need for domain expertise or trial and error.We show that fine-tuning the zero-shot classifier on its most confident predictions leads to significant performance gains across a wide range of text classification tasks, presumably since self-training adapts the zero-shot model to the task at hand. Ariel Gera, Alon Halfon, Eyal Shnarch, Yotam Perlitz, Liat Ein-Dor, Noam Slonim |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2022 | GrASP: A Library for Extracting and Exploring Human-Interpretable Textual PatternsabstractData exploration is an important step of every data science and machine learning project, including those involving textual data. We provide a novel language tool, in the form of a publicly available Python library for extracting patterns from textual data. The library integrates a first public implementation of the existing GrASP algorithm. It allows users to extract patterns using a number of general-purpose built-in linguistic attributes (such as hypernyms, part-of-speech tags, and syntactic dependency tags), as envisaged for the original algorithm, as well as domain-specific custom attributes which can be incorporated into the library by implementing two functions. The library is equipped with a web-based interface empowering human users to conveniently explore data via the extracted patterns, using complementary pattern-centric and example-centric views: the former includes a reading in natural language and statistics of each extracted pattern; the latter shows applications of each extracted pattern to training examples. We demonstrate the usefulness of the library in classification (spam detection and argument mining), model analysis (machine translation), and artifact discovery in datasets (SNLI and 20Newsgroups). Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Leshem Choshen, Eyal Shnarch, Francesca Toni |
LREC | 3 |
| 2020 | Corpus Wide Argument Mining - A Working SolutionabstractOne of the main tasks in argument mining is the retrieval of argumentative content pertaining to a given topic. Most previous work addressed this task by retrieving a relatively small number of relevant documents as the initial source for such content. This line of research yielded moderate success, which is of limited use in a real-world system. Furthermore, for such a system to yield a comprehensive set of relevant arguments, over a wide range of topics, it requires leveraging a large and diverse corpus in an appropriate manner. Here we present a first end-to-end high-precision, corpus-wide argument mining system. This is made possible by combining sentence-level queries over an appropriate indexing of a very large corpus of newspaper articles, with an iterative annotation scheme. This scheme addresses the inherent label bias in the data and pinpoints the regions of the sample space whose manual labeling is required to obtain high-precision among top-ranked candidates. Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Alon Halfon, Benjamin Sznajder, Ariel Gera, Carlos Alzate, Martin Gleize, Leshem Choshen, Yufang Hou 0001, Yonatan Bilu, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Active Learning for BERT: An Empirical StudyabstractLiat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Marina Danilevsky, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Liat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Ariel Gera, Eyal Shnarch, Lena Dankin, Leshem Choshen, Marina Danilevsky, Ranit Aharonov, Yoav Katz, Noam Slonim |
EMNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2019 | Are You Convinced? Choosing the More Convincing Evidence with a Siamese NetworkabstractMachines capable of responding and interacting with humans in helpful ways have become ubiquitous.We now expect them to discuss with us the more delicate questions in our world, and they should do so armed with effective arguments.But what makes an argument more persuasive?What will convince you?In this paper, we present a new data set, IBM-EviConv, of pairs of evidence labeled for convincingness, designed to be more challenging than existing alternatives.We also propose a Siamese neural network architecture shown to outperform several baselines on both a prior convincingness data set and our own.Finally, we provide insights into our experimental results and the various kinds of argumentative value our method is capable of detecting. Martin Gleize, Eyal Shnarch, Leshem Choshen, Lena Dankin, Guy Moshkowich, Ranit Aharonov, Noam Slonim |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2018 | Semantic Relatedness of Wikipedia Concepts - Benchmark Data and a Working Solution
Liat Ein-Dor, Alon Halfon, Yoav Kantor, Ran Levy 0001, Yosi Mass, Ruty Rinott, Eyal Shnarch, Noam Slonim |
LREC | 7 |
| 2017 | GRASP: Rich Patterns for Argumentation MiningabstractWe present the GrASP algorithm for automatically extracting patterns that characterize subtle linguistic phenomena.To that end, GrASP augments each term of input text with multiple layers of linguistic information.These different facets of the text terms are systematically combined to reveal rich patterns.We report highly promising experimental results in several challenging text analysis tasks within the field of Argumentation Mining.We believe that GrASP is general enough to be useful for other domains too. Eyal Shnarch, Ran Levy 0001, Vikas C. Raykar, Noam Slonim |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2010 | Recognising Entailment within Discourse
Shachar Mirkin, Jonathan Berant, Ido Dagan, Eyal Shnarch |
COLING | 4 |
| 2009 | Extracting Lexical Reference Rules from Wikipedia
Eyal Shnarch, Libby Barak, Ido Dagan |
ACL/IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2009 | Evaluating the Inferential Utility of Lexical-Semantic Resources
Shachar Mirkin, Ido Dagan, Eyal Shnarch |
EACL | 3 |
| 2008 | Natural Language as the Basis for Meaning Representation and Inference
Ido Dagan, Roy Bar-Haim, Idan Szpektor, Iddo Greental, Eyal Shnarch |
CICLing | 5 |
| 2007 | Semantic Inference at the Lexical-Syntactic Level
Roy Bar-Haim, Ido Dagan, Iddo Greental, Eyal Shnarch |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2007 | Instance-based Evaluation of Entailment Rule Acquisition
Idan Szpektor, Eyal Shnarch, Ido Dagan |
ACL | 2 |
| 2006 | Lexical Reference: a Semantic Matching Subtask
Oren Glickman, Eyal Shnarch, Ido Dagan |
EMNLP | 2 |