Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shrutivandana Sharma

dblp:67/4182 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0002-2416-1963ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Network optimization and economics · 78% Physical-layer communications · 22%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.222012
Local Public Good Provisioning in Networks: A Nash Implementation Mechanism · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2012
An externalities-based decentralized optimal power allocation algorithm for wireless networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2009
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
nash implementation
0.112012
Local Public Good Provisioning in Networks: A Nash Implementation Mechanism · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2012
Network optimization and economics › game theory
game-theoretic networking
0.112009
An externalities-based decentralized optimal power allocation algorithm for wireless networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2009
Physical-layer communications
power allocation
0.112009
An externalities-based decentralized optimal power allocation algorithm for wireless networks · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

game theory · 0.4decentralized optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Local Public Good Provisioning in Networks: A Nash Implementation Mechanism
abstract
In this paper we study resource allocation in decentralized information local public good networks. A network is a local public good network if each user's actions directly affect the utility of an arbitrary subset of network users. We consider networks where each user knows only that part of the network that either affects or is affected by it. Furthermore, each user's utility and action space are its private information, and each user is a self utility maximizer. This network model is motivated by several applications including wireless communications. For this network model we formulate a decentralized resource allocation problem and develop a decentralized resource allocation mechanism (game form) that possesses the following properties: (i) All Nash equilibria of the game induced by the mechanism result in allocations that are optimal solutions of the corresponding centralized resource allocation problem (Nash implementation). (ii) All users voluntarily participate in the allocation process specified by the mechanism (individual rationality). (iii) The mechanism results in budget balance at all Nash equilibria and off equilibrium.
Shrutivandana Sharma, Demosthenis Teneketzis
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1
2010 Decentralized allocation of CPU computation power for web applications
Shrutivandana Sharma, Asser N. Tantawi, Mike Spreitzer, Malgorzata Steinder
Perform. Evaluation1
2009 An externalities-based decentralized optimal power allocation algorithm for wireless networks
Shrutivandana Sharma, Demosthenis Teneketzis
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1
2007 Multicarrier On-Off Keying for Fast Frequency Hopping Multiple Access Systems in Rayleigh Fading Channels
abstract
We study multicarrier on-off keying (MCOOK) for fast frequency-hopping (FFH) multiple-access systems. The performance of a sub-optimum receiver is analyzed for Rayleigh fading channels and a closed form expression for bit error rate (BER) has been derived for the binary case. We find that the number of chips per symbol required to optimize the perfor- mance of the system varies from system to system. Comparison with FFH M-ary frequency shift keying (MFSK) shows that in the interference-limited region (large MAI), MCOOK performs better than MFSK and further, the gain in the performance increases with increase in the value of modulation index M.
Shrutivandana Sharma, Ajit Kumar Chaturvedi
IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.1