Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michelle Hastings
dblp:67/4734
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › individual differences
gender differences |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: are there gender issues? · CHI 2005 |
Usability and user experience research › individual differences
self-efficacy |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: are there gender issues? · CHI 2005 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Effectiveness of end-user debugging software features: are there gender issues?abstractAlthough gender differences in a technological world are receiving significant research attention, much of the research and practice has aimed at how society and education can impact the successes and retention of female computer science professionals-but the possibility of gender issues within software has received almost no attention. If gender issues exist with some types of software features, it is possible that accommodating them by changing these features can increase effectiveness, but only if we know what these issues are. In this paper, we empirically investigate gender differences for end users in the context of debugging spreadsheets. Our results uncover significant gender differences in self-efficacy and feature acceptance, with females exhibiting lower self-efficacy and lower feature acceptance. The results also show that these differences can significantly reduce females' effectiveness. Laura Beckwith, Margaret M. Burnett, Susan Wiedenbeck, Curtis R. Cook, Shraddha Sorte, Michelle Hastings |
CHI | 6 |