Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher Lo

dblp:67/4956 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0001-8400-0902ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 44% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Reinforcement learning · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction
0.212016
Stochastic Structured Prediction under Bandit Feedback · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
bandit feedback
0.112016
Stochastic Structured Prediction under Bandit Feedback · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic first-order methods
0.112016
Stochastic Structured Prediction under Bandit Feedback · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pairwise preference learning · 0.5non-convex optimization · 0.5convex optimization · 0.5structured prediction · 0.2bandit feedback · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Attribute tracking: strategies towards improved detection and characterization of complex associations
abstract
The detection, modeling and characterization of complex patterns of association in bioinformatics has focused on feature interactions and, more recently, instance-subgroup specific associations (e.g. genetic heterogeneity). Previously, attribute tracking was proposed as an instance-linked memory approach, leveraging the incremental learning of learning classifier systems (LCSs) to track which features were most useful in making class predictions within individual instances. These 'attribute tracking' signatures could later be used to characterize patterns of association in the data. While effective, true underlying patterns remain difficult to characterize in noisy problems, and the original approach places equal weight on tracked feature scores obtained early as well as late in learning. In this work we investigate alternative strategies for attribute tracking scoring, including the adoption of a time recency update scheme taken from reinforcement learning, to gain insight into how to optimize this approach to improve modeling performance and downstream pattern interpretability. We report mixed results over a variety of performance metrics that point to promising future directions for building effective building blocks and improving model interpretability.
Ryan J. Urbanowicz, Christopher Lo, John H. Holmes, Jason H. Moore
GECCO2
2016 Learning Structured Predictors from Bandit Feedback for Interactive NLP
Artem Sokolov 0001, Julia Kreutzer, Christopher Lo, Stefan Riezler
ACL (1)3
2016 Stochastic Structured Prediction under Bandit Feedback
abstract
Stochastic structured prediction under bandit feedback follows a learning protocol where on each of a sequence of iterations, the learner receives an input, predicts an output structure, and receives partial feedback in form of a task loss evaluation of the predicted structure. We present applications of this learning scenario to convex and non-convex objectives for structured prediction and analyze them as stochastic first-order methods. We present an experimental evaluation on problems of natural language processing over exponential output spaces, and compare convergence speed across different objectives under the practical criterion of optimal task performance on development data and the optimization-theoretic criterion of minimal squared gradient norm. Best results under both criteria are obtained for a non-convex objective for pairwise preference learning under bandit feedback.
Artem Sokolov 0001, Julia Kreutzer, Stefan Riezler, Christopher Lo
NIPS4
2007 Analyzing Configuration Management Repository Data for Software Process Improvement
Shihong Huang, Christopher Lo
SEKE2