EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hsueh-Ping Chen
dblp:67/5733
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Distributed computing theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed computing theory
self-stabilization |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Time-Optimal Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols · PODC 2021 Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Regular Graphs · PODC 2020 Self-Stabilizing Leader Election · PODC 2019 |
Distributed computing theory › self-stabilization
self-stabilizing leader election |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Regular Graphs · PODC 2020 Self-Stabilizing Leader Election · PODC 2019 |
Distributed computing theory
population protocols |
0.7 | 3 | 2021 | Time-Optimal Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols · PODC 2021 Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Regular Graphs · PODC 2020 Self-Stabilizing Leader Election · PODC 2019 |
Distributed computing theory
leader election |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Time-Optimal Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols · PODC 2021 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Time-optimal self-stabilizing leader election in population protocolsabstractAbstract We consider the standard population protocol model, where ( a priori ) indistinguishable and anonymous agents interact in pairs according to uniformly random scheduling. The self-stabilizing leader election problem requires the protocol to converge on a single leader agent from any possible initial configuration. We initiate the study of time complexity of population protocols solving this problem in its original setting: with probability 1, in a complete communication graph. The only previously known protocol by Cai, Izumi, and Wada [Theor. Comput. Syst. 50] runs in expected parallel time $$\Theta (n^2)$$ Θ ( n 2 ) and has the optimal number of n states in a population of n agents. The existing protocol has the additional property that it becomes silent, i.e., the agents’ states eventually stop changing. Observing that any silent protocol solving self-stabilizing leader election requires $$\Omega (n)$$ Ω ( n ) expected parallel time, we introduce a silent protocol that uses optimal O ( n ) parallel time and states. Without any silence constraints, we show that it is possible to solve self-stabilizing leader election in asymptotically optimal expected parallel time of $$O(\log n)$$ O ( log n ) , but using at least exponential states (a quasipolynomial number of bits). All of our protocols (and also that of Cai et al.) work by solving the more difficult ranking problem: assigning agents the ranks $$1,\ldots ,n$$ 1 , … , n . Janna Burman, Ho-Lin Chen, Hsueh-Ping Chen, David Doty, Thomas Nowak, Eric Severson |
Distributed Comput. | 3 |
| 2021 | Time-Optimal Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population ProtocolsabstractWe consider the standard population protocol model, where (a priori) indistinguishable and anonymous agents interact in pairs according to uniformly random scheduling. The self-stabilizing leader election problem requires the protocol to converge on a single leader agent from any possible initial configuration. We initiate the study of time complexity of population protocols solving this problem in its original setting: with probability 1, in a complete communication graph. The only previously known protocol by Cai, Izumi, and Wada [Theor. Comput. Syst. 50] runs in expected parallel time Θ(n2) and has the optimal number of n states in a population of n agents. The existing protocol has the additional property that it becomes silent, i.e., the agents' states eventually stop changing. Janna Burman, Ho-Lin Chen, Hsueh-Ping Chen, David Doty, Thomas Nowak 0001, Eric E. Severson, Chuan Xu 0002 |
PODC | 3 |
| 2020 | Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Regular GraphsabstractPopulation protocols [3] are used as a distributed model that captures the behavior of passively mobile agents. Leader election is one of the most well-studied problems in this model. In this paper, we focus on the self-stabilizing leader election (SSLE) problem proposed by Angluin et al. [5]. Previously, it is known that SSLE can be performed on arbitrary rings and tori with a constant number of states [11], but SSLE on complete graphs requires Ω(n) states [9]. Hsueh-Ping Chen, Ho-Lin Chen |
PODC | 1 |
| 2019 | Self-Stabilizing Leader ElectionabstractIn this paper, we study the self-stabilizing leader election (SSLE) problem in population protocols. We construct a non-deterministic population protocol that can solve SSLE on directed rings of all sizes. Our algorithm uses a constant number of states and can be converted to a deterministic population protocol on undirected rings using previous techniques [8]. Furthermore, we extend our algorithm to perform SSLE on directed and undirected tori of arbitrary sizes. Hsueh-Ping Chen, Ho-Lin Chen |
PODC | 1 |