Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yaochung Hung

dblp:67/6344 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 72% Network performance modeling · 15% Network optimization and economics · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols
buffer management
0.021994
Optimal buffer control during congestion in an ATM network node · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1994
Optimal Buffer Control During Congestion in an ATM Network Node · INFOCOM 1993
Internet architecture and protocols › ATM networks
space priority mechanisms
0.021994
Optimal buffer control during congestion in an ATM network node · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1994
Optimal Buffer Control During Congestion in an ATM Network Node · INFOCOM 1993
Internet architecture and protocols
ATM networks
0.011994
Optimal buffer control during congestion in an ATM network node · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1994
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.011994
Optimal buffer control during congestion in an ATM network node · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1994
Network performance modeling › packet loss
cell loss
0.011993
Optimal Buffer Control During Congestion in an ATM Network Node · INFOCOM 1993
Internet architecture and protocols › traffic management
traffic differentiation
0.011993
Optimal Buffer Control During Congestion in an ATM Network Node · INFOCOM 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal control · 0.0buffer allocation scheduling · 0.0markov decision process · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Optimal buffer control during congestion in an ATM network node
abstract
Study the problem of optimal buffer space priority control in an ATM network node. The buffer of a transmission link is shared among the cells of several traffic classes waiting for transmission through the link. When the number of cells to be stored in the buffer exceeds the available buffer space, certain cells have to be dropped. Different traffic classes have different sensitivities to cell losses. By appropriately selecting the classes of cells which are dropped or blocked in case of overflow, one can have the more sensitive classes suffering smaller cell losses. Depending on the control that on the system, three classes of policies are distinguished. In each one, policies that schedule the buffer allocation in some optimal manner are identified.>
Leandros Tassiulas, Yaochung Hung, Shivendra S. Panwar
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.2
1993 Optimal Buffer Control During Congestion in an ATM Network Node
abstract
The problem of optimal buffer space priority control in an asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network node is studied. The buffer of a transmission link is shared among the cells of several traffic classes waiting for transmission through the link. When the number of cells to be stored in the buffer exceed the available buffer space, certain cells have to be dropped. Different traffic classes have different sensitivities to cell losses. By appropriate selection of the classes of cells that are dropped in case of overflow, the more sensitive classes can be made to suffer smaller cell losses. Arriving cells might be blocked from entering the system or they may be dropped after they are already in the buffer. Depending on the control that is on the system, three classes of policies are distinguished. In each one, policies that schedule the buffer allocation in some optimal manner are identified.>
Leandros Tassiulas, Yaochung Hung, Shivendra S. Panwar
INFOCOM2