Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Douglas F. Easton

dblp:67/7237 · also Doug Easton · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-2444-3247ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study
0.622018
AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non-hierarchical additive model set · Bioinform. 2018
SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › gene-gene interaction
SNP interaction analysis
0.622018
AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non-hierarchical additive model set · Bioinform. 2018
SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
fine-mapping
0.312017
VEXOR: an integrative environment for prioritization of functional variants in fine-mapping analysis · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.312017
VEXOR: an integrative environment for prioritization of functional variants in fine-mapping analysis · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
prostate cancer
0.112017
SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant annotation
0.112017
VEXOR: an integrative environment for prioritization of functional variants in fine-mapping analysis · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scalable vector graphics · 0.7hierarchical layout · 0.7non-hierarchical model · 0.6parallel computing · 0.3additive mode · 0.3inheritance mode coding · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 pedigreejs: a web-based graphical pedigree editor
abstract
Motivation: The collection, management and visualization of clinical pedigree (family history) data is a core activity in clinical genetics centres. However, clinical pedigree datasets can be difficult to manage, as they are time consuming to capture, and can be difficult to build, manipulate and visualize graphically. Several standalone graphical pedigree editors and drawing applications exist but there are no freely available lightweight graphical pedigree editors that can be easily configured and incorporated into web applications. Results: We developed 'pedigreejs', an interactive graphical pedigree editor written in JavaScript, which uses standard pedigree nomenclature. Pedigreejs provides an easily configurable, extensible and lightweight pedigree editor. It makes use of an open-source Javascript library to define a hierarchical layout and to produce images in scalable vector graphics (SVG) format that can be viewed and edited in web browsers. Availability and implementation: The software is freely available under GPL licence (https://ccge-boadicea.github.io/pedigreejs/). Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Tim J. Carver, Alex P. Cunningham, Chantal Babb de Villiers, Simon Hartley, Marc Tischkowitz, Fiona M. Walter, Douglas F. Easton, Antonis C. Antoniou
Bioinform.8
2018 AA9int: SNP interaction pattern search using non-hierarchical additive model set
abstract
Motivation: The use of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interactions to predict complex diseases is getting more attention during the past decade, but related statistical methods are still immature. We previously proposed the SNP Interaction Pattern Identifier (SIPI) approach to evaluate 45 SNP interaction patterns/patterns. SIPI is statistically powerful but suffers from a large computation burden. For large-scale studies, it is necessary to use a powerful and computation-efficient method. The objective of this study is to develop an evidence-based mini-version of SIPI as the screening tool or solitary use and to evaluate the impact of inheritance mode and model structure on detecting SNP-SNP interactions. Results: We tested two candidate approaches: the 'Five-Full' and 'AA9int' method. The Five-Full approach is composed of the five full interaction models considering three inheritance modes (additive, dominant and recessive). The AA9int approach is composed of nine interaction models by considering non-hierarchical model structure and the additive mode. Our simulation results show that AA9int has similar statistical power compared to SIPI and is superior to the Five-Full approach, and the impact of the non-hierarchical model structure is greater than that of the inheritance mode in detecting SNP-SNP interactions. In summary, it is recommended that AA9int is a powerful tool to be used either alone or as the screening stage of a two-stage approach (AA9int+SIPI) for detecting SNP-SNP interactions in large-scale studies. Availability and implementation: The 'AA9int' and 'parAA9int' functions (standard and parallel computing version) are added in the SIPI R package, which is freely available at https://linhuiyi.github.io/LinHY_Software/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hui-Yi Lin, Po-Yu Huang, Dung-Tsa Chen, Heng-Yuan Tung, Thomas A. Sellers, Julio M. Pow-Sang, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G. Giles, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A. Haiman, Johanna Schleutker, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Ruth C. Travis, Freddie Hamdy, David E. Neal, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L. Stanford, William J. Blot, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Christiane Maier, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Radka Kaneva, Jyotsna Batra, Manuel R. Teixeira, Hardev Pandha, Yong-Jie Lu, Jong Y. Park
Bioinform.8
2017 VEXOR: an integrative environment for prioritization of functional variants in fine-mapping analysis
abstract
Motivation: The identification of the functional variants responsible for observed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) signals is one of the most challenging tasks of the post-GWAS research era. Several tools have been developed to annotate genetic variants by their genomic location and potential functional implications. Each of these tools has its own requirements and internal logic, which forces the user to become acquainted with each interface. Results: From an awareness of the amount of work needed to analyze a single locus, we have built a flexible, versatile and easy-to-use web interface designed to help in prioritizing variants and predicting their potential functional implications. This interface acts as a single-point of entry linking association results with reference tools and relevant experiments. Availability and Implementation: VEXOR is an integrative web application implemented through the Shiny framework and available at: http://romix.genome.ulaval.ca/vexor. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Audrey Lemaçon, Charles Joly Beauparlant, Penny Soucy, Jamie Allen, Douglas F. Easton, Peter Kraft, Jacques Simard, Arnaud Droit
Bioinform.5
2017 SNP interaction pattern identifier (SIPI): an intensive search for SNP-SNP interaction patterns
abstract
Motivation: Testing SNP-SNP interactions is considered as a key for overcoming bottlenecks of genetic association studies. However, related statistical methods for testing SNP-SNP interactions are underdeveloped. Results: We propose the SNP Interaction Pattern Identifier (SIPI), which tests 45 biologically meaningful interaction patterns for a binary outcome. SIPI takes non-hierarchical models, inheritance modes and mode coding direction into consideration. The simulation results show that SIPI has higher power than MDR (Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction), AA_Full, Geno_Full (full interaction model with additive or genotypic mode) and SNPassoc in detecting interactions. Applying SIPI to the prostate cancer PRACTICAL consortium data with approximately 21 000 patients, the four SNP pairs in EGFR-EGFR , EGFR-MMP16 and EGFR-CSF1 were found to be associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness with the exact or similar pattern in the discovery and validation sets. A similar match for external validation of SNP-SNP interaction studies is suggested. We demonstrated that SIPI not only searches for more meaningful interaction patterns but can also overcome the unstable nature of interaction patterns. Availability and Implementation: The SIPI software is freely available at http://publichealth.lsuhsc.edu/LinSoftware/ . Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hui-Yi Lin, Dung-Tsa Chen, Po-Yu Huang, Yung-Hsin Liu, Augusto Ochoa, Jovanny Zabaleta, Donald Mercante, Zhide Fang, Thomas A. Sellers, Julio M. Pow-Sang, Chia-Ho Cheng, Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G. Giles, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A. Haiman, Johanna Schleutker, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Ruth C. Travis, Freddie Hamdy, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L. Stanford, William J. Blot, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Christiane Maier, Adam S. Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Radka Kaneva, Jyotsna Batra, Manuel R. Teixeira, Hardev Pandha, Yong-Jie Lu, Jong Y. Park
Bioinform.13
2016 FastPop: a rapid principal component derived method to infer intercontinental ancestry using genetic data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying subpopulations within a study and inferring intercontinental ancestry of the samples are important steps in genome wide association studies. Two software packages are widely used in analysis of substructure: Structure and Eigenstrat. Structure assigns each individual to a population by using a Bayesian method with multiple tuning parameters. It requires considerable computational time when dealing with thousands of samples and lacks the ability to create scores that could be used as covariates. Eigenstrat uses a principal component analysis method to model all sources of sampling variation. However, it does not readily provide information directly relevant to ancestral origin; the eigenvectors generated by Eigenstrat are sample specific and thus cannot be generalized to other individuals. RESULTS: We developed FastPop, an efficient R package that fills the gap between Structure and Eigenstrat. It can: 1, generate PCA scores that identify ancestral origins and can be used for multiple studies; 2, infer ancestry information for data arising from two or more intercontinental origins. We demonstrate the use of FastPop using 2318 SNP markers selected from the genome based on high variability among European, Asian and West African (African) populations. We conducted an analysis of 505 Hapmap samples with European, African or Asian ancestry along with 19661 additional samples of unknown ancestry. The results from FastPop are highly consistent with those obtained by Structure across the 19661 samples we studied. The correlations of the results between FastPop and Structure are 0.99, 0.97 and 0.99 for European, African and Asian ancestry scores, respectively. Compared with Structure, FastPop is more efficient as it finished ancestry inference for 19661 samples in 16 min compared with 21-24 h required by Structure. FastPop also provided scores based on SNP weights so the scores of reference population can be applied to other studies provided the same set of markers are used. We also present application of the method for studying four continental populations (European, Asian, African, and Native American). CONCLUSIONS: We developed an algorithm that can infer ancestries on data involving two or more intercontinental origins. It is efficient for analyzing large datasets. Additionally the PCA derived scores can be applied to multiple data sets to ensure the same ancestry analysis is applied to all studies.
Yafang Li, Jinyoung Byun, Guoshuai Cai, Xiangjun Xiao, Younghun Han, Olivier Cornelis, James E. Dinulos, Joe Dennis, Douglas F. Easton, Ivan P. Gorlov, Michael F. Seldin, Christopher I. Amos
BMC Bioinform.9
2013 The admixture maximum likelihood test to test for association between rare variants and disease phenotypes
abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of genotyping arrays containing hundreds of thousands of rare variants across the genome and advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have made feasible empirical genetic association studies to search for rare disease susceptibility alleles. As single variant testing is underpowered to detect associations, the development of statistical methods to combine analysis across variants - so-called "burden tests" - is an area of active research interest. We previously developed a method, the admixture maximum likelihood test, to test multiple, common variants for association with a trait of interest. We have extended this method, called the rare admixture maximum likelihood test (RAML), for the analysis of rare variants. In this paper we compare the performance of RAML with six other burden tests designed to test for association of rare variants. RESULTS: We used simulation testing over a range of scenarios to test the power of RAML compared to the other rare variant association testing methods. These scenarios modelled differences in effect variability, the average direction of effect and the proportion of associated variants. We evaluated the power for all the different scenarios. RAML tended to have the greatest power for most scenarios where the proportion of associated variants was small, whereas SKAT-O performed a little better for the scenarios with a higher proportion of associated variants. CONCLUSIONS: The RAML method makes no assumptions about the proportion of variants that are associated with the phenotype of interest or the magnitude and direction of their effect. The method is flexible and can be applied to both dichotomous and quantitative traits and allows for the inclusion of covariates in the underlying regression model. The RAML method performed well compared to the other methods over a wide range of scenarios. Generally power was moderate in most of the scenarios, underlying the need for large sample sizes in any form of association testing.
Jonathan P. Tyrer, Douglas F. Easton, Paul D. P. Pharoah
BMC Bioinform.3
2009 Seq4SNPs: new software for retrieval of multiple, accurately annotated DNA sequences, ready formatted for SNP assay design
abstract
BACKGROUND: In moderate-throughput SNP genotyping there was a gap in the workflow, between choosing a set of SNPs and submitting their sequences to proprietary assay design software, which was not met by existing software. Retrieval and formatting of sequences flanking each SNP, prior to assay design, becomes rate-limiting for more than about ten SNPs, especially if annotated for repetitive regions and adjacent variations. We routinely process up to 50 SNPs at once. IMPLEMENTATION: We created Seq4SNPs, a web-based, walk-away software that can process one to several hundred SNPs given rs numbers as input. It outputs a file of fully annotated sequences formatted for one of three proprietary design softwares: TaqMan's Primer-By-Design FileBuilder, Sequenom's iPLEX or SNPstream's Autoprimer, as well as unannotated fasta sequences. We found genotyping assays to be inhibited by repetitive sequences or the presence of additional variations flanking the SNP under test, and in multiplexes, repetitive sequence flanking one SNP adversely affects multiple assays. Assay design software programs avoid such regions if the input sequences are appropriately annotated, so we used Seq4SNPs to provide suitably annotated input sequences, and improved our genotyping success rate. Adjacent SNPs can also be avoided, by annotating sequences used as input for primer design. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of annotation by Seq4SNPs is significantly better than manual annotation (P < 1e-5).Using Seq4SNPs to incorporate all annotation for additional SNPs and repetitive elements into sequences, for genotyping assay designer software, minimizes assay failure at the design stage, reducing the cost of genotyping. Seq4SNPs provides a rapid route for replacement of poor test SNP sequences. We routinely use this software for assay sequence preparation. Seq4SNPs is available as a service at (http://moya.srl.cam.ac.uk/oncology/bio/s4shome.html) and (http://moya.srl.cam.ac.uk/cgi-bin/oncology/srl/ncbi/seq4snp1.pl), currently for human SNPs, but easily extended to include any species in dbSNP.
Helen I. Field, Serena A. Scollen, Craig Luccarini, Caroline Baynes, Jonathan Morrison, Alison M. Dunning, Douglas F. Easton, Paul D. P. Pharoah
BMC Bioinform.7