EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junping Zhou
dblp:67/8263
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
6 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 51% Mathematical optimization · 32% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 9% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
local search |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | DiverSAT: A Novel and Effective Local Search Algorithm for Diverse SAT Problem · AAAI 2025 Enhance Diversified Top-k MaxSAT Solving by Incorporating New Strategy for Generating Diversified Initial Assignments (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability |
0.9 | 2 | 2025 | DiverSAT: A Novel and Effective Local Search Algorithm for Diverse SAT Problem · AAAI 2025 New Worst-Case Upper Bound for #2-SAT and #3-SAT with the Number of Clauses as the Parameter · AAAI 2010 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
maximum satisfiability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhance Diversified Top-k MaxSAT Solving by Incorporating New Strategy for Generating Diversified Initial Assignments (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability › SAT solving
AllSAT solving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AllSATCC: Boosting AllSAT Solving with Efficient Component Analysis · IJCAI 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
SAT solving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | AllSATCC: Boosting AllSAT Solving with Efficient Component Analysis · IJCAI 2022 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › clique
maximum clique |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Solving diversified top-k weight clique search problem · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Solving diversified top-k weight clique search problem · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint programming
quantified constraint satisfaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Hybrid Tractable Classes of Binary Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems · AAAI 2011 |
Computational complexity › complexity of reasoning
tractable fragments |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Hybrid Tractable Classes of Binary Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems · AAAI 2011 |
Computational complexity › counting complexity
#SAT |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | New Worst-Case Upper Bound for #2-SAT and #3-SAT with the Number of Clauses as the Parameter · AAAI 2010 |
Computational complexity › counting problems
exact counting |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | New Worst-Case Upper Bound for #2-SAT and #3-SAT with the Number of Clauses as the Parameter · AAAI 2010 |
Algorithms and data structures
exact exponential algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | New Worst-Case Upper Bound for #2-SAT and #3-SAT with the Number of Clauses as the Parameter · AAAI 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
perturbation strategy · 0.9heuristics · 0.9initial assignment generation · 0.8nonchronological backtracking · 0.6DPLL · 0.6clique search · 0.5broken-triangle property · 0.2broken-angle property · 0.2clause-parameterized complexity analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | DiverSAT: A Novel and Effective Local Search Algorithm for Diverse SAT ProblemabstractFor many real-world problems, users are often interested not only in finding a single solution but in obtaining a sufficiently diverse collection of solutions. In this work, we consider the Diverse SAT problem, aiming to find a set of diverse satisfying assignments for a given propositional formula. We propose a novel and effective local search algorithm, DiverSAT, to solve the problem. To cope with diversity, we introduce three heuristics and a perturbation strategy based on some relevant information. We conduct extensive experiments on a large number of public benchmarks, collected from semiformal hardware verification, logistics planning, and other domains. The results show that DiverSAT outperforms the existing algorithms on most of these benchmarks. Junping Zhou, Minghao Yin |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Enhance Diversified Top-k MaxSAT Solving by Incorporating New Strategy for Generating Diversified Initial Assignments (Student Abstract)abstractThe Diversified Top-k MaxSAT (DTKMS) problem is an extension of MaxSAT. The objective of DTKMS is to find k feasible assignments of a given formula, such that each assignment satisfies all hard clauses and the k assignments together satisfy the maximum number of soft clauses. This paper presents a local search algorithm, DTKMS-DIA, which incorporates a new approach to generating initial assignments. Experimental results indicate that DTKMS-DIA can achieve attractive performance on 826 instances compared with state-of-the-art solvers. Junping Zhou, Minghao Yin |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | LS-DTKMS: A Local Search Algorithm for Diversified Top-k MaxSAT Problem
Junping Zhou, Minghao Yin |
SAT | 1 |
| 2022 | AllSATCC: Boosting AllSAT Solving with Efficient Component AnalysisabstractAll Solution SAT (AllSAT) is a variant of Propositional Satisfiability, which aims to find all satisfying assignments for a given formula. AllSAT has significant applications in different domains, such as software testing, data mining, and network verification. In this paper, observing that the lack of component analysis may result in more work for algorithms with non-chronological backtracking, we propose a DPLL-based algorithm for solving AllSAT problem, named AllSATCC, which takes advantage of component analysis to reduce work repetition caused by non-chronological backtracking. The experimental results show that our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms on most instances. Feifei Ma, Junping Zhou, Minghao Yin |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2021 | Solving diversified top-k weight clique search problem
Junping Zhou, Chu Min Li 0001, Yupeng Zhou, Lili Liang |
Sci. China Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2011 | Hybrid Tractable Classes of Binary Quantified Constraint Satisfaction ProblemsabstractIn this paper, we investigate the hybrid tractability of binary Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems (QCSPs). First, a basic tractable class of binary QCSPs is identified by using the broken-triangle property. In this class, the variable ordering for the broken-triangle property must be same as that in the prefix of the QCSP. Second, we break this restriction to allow that existentially quantified variables can be shifted within or out of their blocks, and thus identify some novel tractable classes by introducing the broken-angle property. Finally, we identify a more generalized tractable class, i.e., the min-of-max extendable class for QCSPs. Jian Gao 0007, Minghao Yin, Junping Zhou |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2010 | New Worst-Case Upper Bound for #2-SAT and #3-SAT with the Number of Clauses as the ParameterabstractThe rigorous theoretical analyses of algorithms for #SAT have been proposed in the literature. As we know, previous algorithms for solving #SAT have been analyzed only regarding the number of variables as the parameter. However, the time complexity for solving #SAT instances depends not only on the number of variables, but also on the number of clauses. Therefore, it is significant to exploit the time complexity from the other point of view, i.e. the number of clauses. In this paper, we present algorithms for solving #2-SAT and #3-SAT with rigorous complexity analyses using the number of clauses as the parameter. By analyzing the algorithms, we obtain the new worst-case upper bounds O(1.1892m) for #2-SAT and O(1.4142m) for #3-SAT, where m is the number of clauses. Junping Zhou, Minghao Yin, Chunguang Zhou |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2010 | An effective GSA based memetic algorithm for permutation flow shop schedulingabstractThe permutation flow shop problem (PFSSP) is a well-known difficult combinatorial optimization problem. In this paper, we present a new hybrid optimization algorithm named SIGSA to solve the PFSSP. This algorithm is composed by the LRV rule, SA-based local search and IIS-based local search. First, to make GSA suitable for PFSSP, a new LRV rule based on random key is introduced to convert the continuous position in GSA to the discrete job permutation. Second, to enhance the searching capability, the SA-based local search is designed to help the algorithm to escape from local minimum. Then, the IIS-based local search is used for enhancing the individuals in GSA with a certain probability. Additionally, Comparison with other results in the literature shows that the SIGSA is an efficient and effective approach for the PFSSP. Xiangtao Li, Junping Zhou, Minghao Yin |
IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation | 3 |