Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul R. Stephan

dblp:67/881 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011996
Combinational test generation using satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1996
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation
satisfiability-based test generation
0.011996
Combinational test generation using satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1996
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.011996
Combinational test generation using satisfiability · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

satisfiability solving · 0.0greedy heuristics · 0.0depth-first search · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Combinational test generation using satisfiability
abstract
We present a robust, efficient algorithm for combinational test generation using a reduction to satisfiability (SAT). The algorithm, Test Generation Using Satisfiability (TEGUS), solves a simplified test set characteristic equation using straightforward but powerful greedy heuristics, ordering the variables using depth-first search and selecting a variable from the next unsatisfied clause at each branching point. For difficult faults, the computation of global implications is iterated, which finds more implications than previous approaches and subsumes structural heuristics such as unique sensitization. Without random tests or fault simulation, TEGUS completes on every fault in the ISCAS networks, demonstrating its robustness, and is ten times faster for those networks which have been completed by previous algorithms. Our implementation of TEGUS can be used as a base line for comparing test generation algorithms; we present comparisons with 45 recently published algorithms. TEGUS combines the advantages of the elegant organization of SAT-based algorithms with the efficiency of structural algorithms.
Paul R. Stephan, Robert K. Brayton, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
1993 Physically Realizable Gate Models
abstract
Proposes an objective criterion for determining if, given a specific circuit technology, a gate model is suitable for synthesis and verification. This is based on relating the analog circuit behavior to the digital model behavior using a formal definition of implementation. We illustrate the type of design errors which occur when the criterion is not satisfied, and introduce a gate model designed to satisfy the criterion.>
Paul R. Stephan, Robert K. Brayton
ICCD1
1991 Timing Analysis and Delay-Fault Test Generation using Path-Recursive Functions
abstract
The authors introduce an efficient method for generating the functional forms of path analysis problems. They demonstrate that the resulting function is linear in the size of the circuit. The functions are then tested for satisfiability either using a Boolean network satisfiability algorithm suggested by T. Larrabee (1989) or through the construction of BDDs. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is shown for timing analysis and robust path delay-fault test generation. This method also holds promise for both static and dynamic hazard analysis, and for test generation using all other delay-fault models, tau -irredundant fault models, and stuck-open fault models.>
Patrick C. McGeer, Alexander Saldanha, Paul R. Stephan, Robert K. Brayton, Alberto L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
ICCAD3
1991 Synthesis of Hazard-Free Asynchronous Circuits from Graphical Specifications
abstract
The authors propose some syntactic and semantic extensions to a graphical specification called the signal transition graph (STG). They allow controlled-choice places to have fanout transitions of input signals and arbitrary Boolean expressions can be used as edge labels. They also allow one STG marking to represent more than one state. These extensions allow for a more natural and compact specification of asynchronous behavior. It is also shown that syntactic constraints on STGs are not sufficient to guarantee hazard-free implementations, and techniques are presented to synthesize hazard-free SOP, (sum of products) implementations under both SIC (single input change) and MIC (multiple input change) conditions. The synthesized circuits are speed-independent. They are hazard-free, independently of the gate delay variations, assuming that the circuit operates in fundamental mode.>
Cho W. Moon, Paul R. Stephan, Robert K. Brayton
ICCAD2