Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vincent A. Fusaro

dblp:67/93 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 81% Medical and health informatics · 19%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
clinical diagnosis
0.112015
A Python package for parsing, validating, mapping and formatting sequence variants using HGVS nomenclature · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
high-throughput sequencing
0.112015
A Python package for parsing, validating, mapping and formatting sequence variants using HGVS nomenclature · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

validation · 0.2parsing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Using a chat-based informed consent tool in large-scale genomic research
abstract
OBJECTIVE: We implemented a chatbot consent tool to shift the time burden from study staff in support of a national genomics research study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We created an Institutional Review Board-approved script for automated chat-based consent. We compared data from prospective participants who used the tool or had traditional consent conversations with study staff. RESULTS: Chat-based consent, completed on a user's schedule, was shorter than the traditional conversation. This did not lead to a significant change in affirmative consents. Within affirmative consents and declines, more prospective participants completed the chat-based process. A quiz to assess chat-based consent user understanding had a high pass rate with no reported negative experiences. CONCLUSION: Our report shows that a structured script can convey important information while realizing the benefits of automation and burden shifting. Analysis suggests that it may be advantageous to use chatbots to scale this rate-limiting step in large research projects.
Sarah K. Savage, Jonathan Lotempio, Erica D. Smith, E. Hallie Andrew, Gloria Mas, Amanda H. Kahn-Kirby, Emmanuèle Délot, Andrea J. Cohen, Georgia Pitsava, Robert Nussbaum, Vincent A. Fusaro, Seth Berger, Eric Vilain
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.11
2017 Creating a scalable clinical pharmacogenomics service with automated interpretation and medical record result integration - experience from a pediatric tertiary care facility
abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper outlines the implementation of a comprehensive clinical pharmacogenomics (PGx) service within a pediatric teaching hospital and the integration of clinical decision support in the electronic health record (EHR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An approach to clinical decision support for medication ordering and dispensing driven by documented PGx variant status in an EHR is described. A web-based platform was created to automatically generate a clinical report from either raw assay results or specified diplotypes, able to parse and combine haplotypes into an interpretation for each individual and compared to the reference lab call for accuracy. RESULTS: Clinical decision support rules built within an EHR provided guidance to providers for 31 patients (100%) who had actionable PGx variants and were written for interacting medications. A breakdown of the PGx alerts by practitioner service, and alert response for the initial cohort of patients tested is described. In 90% (355/394) of the cases, thiopurine methyltranferase genotyping was ordered pre-emptively. DISCUSSION: This paper outlines one approach to implementing a clinical PGx service in a pediatric teaching hospital that cares for a heterogeneous patient population. There is a focus on incorporation of PGx clinical decision support rules and a program to standardize report text within the electronic health record with subsequent exploration of clinician behavior in response to the alerts. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of PGx data at the time of prescribing and dispensing, if done correctly, has the potential to impact the incidence of adverse drug events, a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.
Shannon F. Manzi, Vincent A. Fusaro, Laura Chadwick, Catherine Brownstein, Catherine Clinton, Kenneth D. Mandl, Wendy A. Wolf, Jared B. Hawkins
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.2
2015 A Python package for parsing, validating, mapping and formatting sequence variants using HGVS nomenclature
abstract
UNLABELLED: Biological sequence variants are commonly represented in scientific literature, clinical reports and databases of variation using the mutation nomenclature guidelines endorsed by the Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS). Despite the widespread use of the standard, no freely available and comprehensive programming libraries are available. Here we report an open-source and easy-to-use Python library that facilitates the parsing, manipulation, formatting and validation of variants according to the HGVS specification. The current implementation focuses on the subset of the HGVS recommendations that precisely describe sequence-level variation relevant to the application of high-throughput sequencing to clinical diagnostics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The package is released under the Apache 2.0 open-source license. Source code, documentation and issue tracking are available at http://bitbucket.org/hgvs/hgvs/. Python packages are available at PyPI (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/hgvs). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Reece K. Hart, Rudolph Rico, Emily Hare, John Garcia, Jody Westbrook, Vincent A. Fusaro
Bioinform.6
2011 Biomedical Cloud Computing With Amazon Web Services
abstract
In this overview to biomedical computing in the cloud, we discussed two primary ways to use the cloud (a single instance or cluster), provided a detailed example using NGS mapping, and highlighted the associated costs. While many users new to the cloud may assume that entry is as straightforward as uploading an application and selecting an instance type and storage options, we illustrated that there is substantial up-front effort required before an application can make full use of the cloud's vast resources. Our intention was to provide a set of best practices and to illustrate how those apply to a typical application pipeline for biomedical informatics, but also general enough for extrapolation to other types of computational problems. Our mapping example was intended to illustrate how to develop a scalable project and not to compare and contrast alignment algorithms for read mapping and genome assembly. Indeed, with a newer aligner such as Bowtie, it is possible to map the entire African genome using one m2.2xlarge instance in 48 hours for a total cost of approximately $48 in computation time. In our example, we were not concerned with data transfer rates, which are heavily influenced by the amount of available bandwidth, connection latency, and network availability. When transferring large amounts of data to the cloud, bandwidth limitations can be a major bottleneck, and in some cases it is more efficient to simply mail a storage device containing the data to AWS (http://aws.amazon.com/importexport/). More information about cloud computing, detailed cost analysis, and security can be found in references.
Vincent A. Fusaro, Prasad Patil, Erik Gafni, Dennis P. Wall, Peter J. Tonellato
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2010 Cloud computing for comparative genomics
abstract
BACKGROUND: Large comparative genomics studies and tools are becoming increasingly more compute-expensive as the number of available genome sequences continues to rise. The capacity and cost of local computing infrastructures are likely to become prohibitive with the increase, especially as the breadth of questions continues to rise. Alternative computing architectures, in particular cloud computing environments, may help alleviate this increasing pressure and enable fast, large-scale, and cost-effective comparative genomics strategies going forward. To test this, we redesigned a typical comparative genomics algorithm, the reciprocal smallest distance algorithm (RSD), to run within Amazon's Elastic Computing Cloud (EC2). We then employed the RSD-cloud for ortholog calculations across a wide selection of fully sequenced genomes. RESULTS: We ran more than 300,000 RSD-cloud processes within the EC2. These jobs were farmed simultaneously to 100 high capacity compute nodes using the Amazon Web Service Elastic Map Reduce and included a wide mix of large and small genomes. The total computation time took just under 70 hours and cost a total of $6,302 USD. CONCLUSIONS: The effort to transform existing comparative genomics algorithms from local compute infrastructures is not trivial. However, the speed and flexibility of cloud computing environments provides a substantial boost with manageable cost. The procedure designed to transform the RSD algorithm into a cloud-ready application is readily adaptable to similar comparative genomics problems.
Dennis P. Wall, Parul Kudtarkar, Vincent A. Fusaro, Rimma Perotte, Prasad Patil, Peter J. Tonellato
BMC Bioinform.3