Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johnston Jiaa

dblp:67/9655 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 56% Debugging and program repair · 44%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › part-based recognition
discriminative part learning
0.212013
Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.212013
Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
part-based object detection
0.212013
Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
part-based recognition
0.212013
Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition · CVPR 2013
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair
0.112011
ReAssert: a tool for repairing broken unit tests · ICSE 2011
Software testing
test repair
0.112011
ReAssert: a tool for repairing broken unit tests · ICSE 2011
Software testing
unit testing
0.012011
ReAssert: a tool for repairing broken unit tests · ICSE 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sigmoid weak learners · 0.2boosted classifier · 0.2HOG features · 0.2automated repair · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Learning Collections of Part Models for Object Recognition
abstract
We propose a method to learn a diverse collection of discriminative parts from object bounding box annotations. Part detectors can be trained and applied individually, which simplifies learning and extension to new features or categories. We apply the parts to object category detection, pooling part detections within bottom-up proposed regions and using a boosted classifier with proposed sigmoid weak learners for scoring. On PASCAL VOC 2010, we evaluate the part detectors' ability to discriminate and localize annotated key points. Our detection system is competitive with the best-existing systems, outperforming other HOG-based detectors on the more deformable categories.
Ian Endres, Kevin J. Shih, Johnston Jiaa, Derek Hoiem
CVPR3
2011 ReAssert: a tool for repairing broken unit tests
abstract
Successful software systems continuously change their requirements and thus code. When this happens, some existing tests get broken because they no longer reflect the intended behavior, and thus they need to be updated. Repairing broken tests can be time-consuming and difficult.
Brett Daniel, Danny Dig, Tihomir Gvero, Vilas Jagannath, Johnston Jiaa, Damion Mitchell, Jurand Nogiec, Shin Hwei Tan, Darko Marinov
ICSE5