Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Austin Webb

dblp:68/10453 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 61% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 39%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.222012
Learning Efficient Markov Networks · NIPS 2010
A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
first-order probabilistic logic
0.112012
A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
probabilistic logic
0.112012
A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
tractable inference
0.112012
A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
context-specific independence
0.112010
Learning Efficient Markov Networks · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › markov random field
markov network structure learning
0.112010
Learning Efficient Markov Networks · NIPS 2010
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning › probabilistic logic
markov logic networks
0.012012
A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic · AAAI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic performance guarantees · 0.1greedy search · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 A Tractable First-Order Probabilistic Logic
abstract
Tractable subsets of first-order logic are a central topic in AI research. Several of these formalisms have been used as the basis for first-order probabilistic languages. However, these are intractable, losing the original motivation. Here we propose the first non-trivially tractable first-order probabilistic language. It is a subset of Markov logic, and uses probabilistic class and part hierarchies to control complexity. We call it TML (Tractable Markov Logic). We show that TML knowledge bases allow for efficient inference even when the corresponding graphical models have very high treewidth. We also show how probabilistic inheritance, default reasoning, and other inference patterns can be carried out in TML. TML opens up the prospect of efficient large-scale first-order probabilistic inference.
Pedro M. Domingos, William Austin Webb
AAAI2
2010 Learning Efficient Markov Networks
abstract
We present an algorithm for learning high-treewidth Markov networks where inference is still tractable. This is made possible by exploiting context specific independence and determinism in the domain. The class of models our algorithm can learn has the same desirable properties as thin junction trees: polynomial inference, closed form weight learning, etc., but is much broader. Our algorithm searches for a feature that divides the state space into subspaces where the remaining variables decompose into independent subsets (conditioned on the feature or its negation) and recurses on each subspace/subset of variables until no useful new features can be found. We provide probabilistic performance guarantees for our algorithm under the assumption that the maximum feature length is k (the treewidth can be much larger) and dependences are of bounded strength. We also propose a greedy version of the algorithm that, while forgoing these guarantees, is much more efficient.Experiments on a variety of domains show that our approach compares favorably with thin junction trees and other Markov network structure learners.
Vibhav Gogate, William Austin Webb, Pedro M. Domingos
NIPS2