Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vijay Pappu

dblp:68/11375 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research
user engagement
0.612022
Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments · WWW 2022
Empirical software engineering › controlled experiment
online controlled experiments
0.612022
Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments · WWW 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
survival analysis
0.212022
Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments · WWW 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survival models · 1.7a/b testing · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Timely Personalization at Peloton: A System and Algorithm for Boosting Time-Relevant Content
abstract
At Peloton, we are challenged to not just surface relevant recommendations of fitness classes to our members, but also timely ones. As our fitness content library expands, we continually produce classes on certain themes which are most timely during a narrow time window. To address this challenge, we provide some control over our recommendations to external stakeholders, such as production and marketing teams. They enter timed boosts of certain classes during the windows they are relevant in. We have built out algorithms which take these desired classes and elevate the number of impressions for them, while preserving members’ engagement with our recommendations. In this paper, we discuss the system, the algorithms and some results from a few A/B tests showing how boosting works in practice.
Shayak Banerjee, Vijay Pappu, Nilothpal Talukder, Shoya Yoshida, Arnab Bhadury, Allison Schloss, Jasmine Paulino
RecSys2
2022 Using Survival Models to Estimate User Engagement in Online Experiments
abstract
Online controlled experiments, in which different variants of a product are compared based on an Overall Evaluation Criterion (OEC), have emerged as a gold standard for decision making in online services. It is vital that the OEC is aligned with the overall goal of stakeholders for effective decision making. However, this is a challenge when the overall goal is not immediately observable. For instance, we might want to understand the effect of deploying a feature on long-term retention, where the outcome (retention) is not observable at the end of an A/B test.
Praveen Chandar, Brian St. Thomas, Lucas Maystre, Vijay Pappu, Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda, Tiffany Wu, Ben Carterette, Mounia Lalmas-Roelleke, Tony Jebara
WWW4
2015 Sparse Proximal Support Vector Machines for feature selection in high dimensional datasets
Vijay Pappu, Orestis P. Panagopoulos, Petros Xanthopoulos, Panos M. Pardalos
Expert Syst. Appl.1