Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James N. Glosli

dblp:68/1191 · also Jim Glosli · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-4827-4206ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 8 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
6 papers
High-performance computing · 76% Parallel and multicore computing · 14% Distributed systems · 7%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 87% Medical and health informatics · 8% Computational science and engineering · 5%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
1.032021
Generalizable coordination of large multiscale workflows: challenges and learnings at scale · SC 2021
A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer · SC 2019
Beyond homogeneous decomposition: scaling long-range forces on Massively Parallel Systems · SC 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
multiscale modeling
0.412019
A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer · SC 2019
High-performance computing
application porting
0.412019
Preparation and optimization of a diverse workload for a large-scale heterogeneous system · SC 2019
Parallel and multicore computing
programming models
0.412019
Preparation and optimization of a diverse workload for a large-scale heterogeneous system · SC 2019
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
molecular dynamics simulation
0.222009
Beyond homogeneous decomposition: scaling long-range forces on Massively Parallel Systems · SC 2009
Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability · SC 2007
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.112021
Generalizable coordination of large multiscale workflows: challenges and learnings at scale · SC 2021
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale
0.112012
Toward real-time modeling of human heart ventricles at cellular resolution: simulation of drug-induced arrhythmias · SC 2012
High-performance computing › large-scale simulation
petascale simulation
0.112012
Toward real-time modeling of human heart ventricles at cellular resolution: simulation of drug-induced arrhythmias · SC 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational oncology
cancer modeling
0.112019
A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer · SC 2019
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.112019
Preparation and optimization of a diverse workload for a large-scale heterogeneous system · SC 2019
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelization strategies
parallel decomposition
0.112009
Beyond homogeneous decomposition: scaling long-range forces on Massively Parallel Systems · SC 2009
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112007
Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability · SC 2007
High-performance computing
parallel i/o
0.112007
Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability · SC 2007
High-performance computing
scientific computing
0.112007
Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability · SC 2007
Computational science and engineering › computational physics
plasma physics simulation
0.012009
Beyond homogeneous decomposition: scaling long-range forces on Massively Parallel Systems · SC 2009
High-performance computing › supercomputing
bluegene/l
0.012007
Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability · SC 2007
High-performance computing
supercomputing
0.012007
Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability · SC 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.5in situ feedback · 0.5parallel scaling · 0.3cellular-resolution simulation · 0.3long-range force computation · 0.2heterogeneous decomposition · 0.2interatomic force calculation optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Generalizable coordination of large multiscale workflows: challenges and learnings at scale
abstract
The advancement of machine learning techniques and the heterogeneous architectures of most current supercomputers are propelling the demand for large multiscale simulations that can automatically and autonomously couple diverse components and map them to relevant resources to solve complex problems at multiple scales. Nevertheless, despite the recent progress in workflow technologies, current capabilities are limited to coupling two scales. In the first-ever demonstration of using three scales of resolution, we present a scalable and generalizable framework that couples pairs of models using machine learning and in situ feedback. We expand upon the massively parallel Multiscale Machine-Learned Modeling Infrastructure (MuMMI), a recent, award-winning workflow, and generalize the framework beyond its original design. We discuss the challenges and learnings in executing a massive multiscale simulation campaign that utilized over 600,000 node hours on Summit and achieved more than 98% GPU occupancy for more than 83% of the time. We present innovations to enable several orders of magnitude scaling, including simultaneously coordinating 24,000 jobs, and managing several TBs of new data per day and over a billion files in total. Finally, we describe the generalizability of our framework and, with an upcoming open-source release, discuss how the presented framework may be used for new applications.
Harsh Bhatia, Francesco Di Natale, Joseph Y. Moon, Joseph R. Chavez, Fikret Aydin, Christopher B. Stanley, Tomas Oppelstrup, Chris Neale, Sara Kokkila Schumacher, Dong H. Ahn, Stephen Herbein, Timothy S. Carpenter, Sandrasegaram Gnanakaran, Peer-Timo Bremer, James N. Glosli, Felice C. Lightstone, Helgi I. Ingólfsson
SC16
2019 Preparation and optimization of a diverse workload for a large-scale heterogeneous system
abstract
Productivity from day one on supercomputers that leverage new technologies requires significant preparation. An institution that procures a novel system architecture often lacks sufficient institutional knowledge and skills to prepare for it. Thus, the "Center of Excellence" (CoE) concept has emerged to prepare for systems such as Summit and Sierra, currently the top two systems in the Top 500. This paper documents CoE experiences that prepared a workload of diverse applications and math libraries for a heterogeneous system. We describe our approach to this preparation, including our management and execution strategies, and detail our experiences with and reasons for using different programming approaches. Our early science and performance results show that the project enabled significant early seismic science with up to a l4X throughput increase over Cori. In addition to our successes, we discuss our challenges and failures so others may benefit from our experience.
Ian Karlin, Yoonho Park, Bronis R. de Supinski, Bert Still, D. A. Beckingsale, Robert Blake, Tong Chen 0001, Guojing Cong, Carlos H. A. Costa, Johann Dahm, Giacomo Domeniconi, Thomas Epperly, Aaron Fisher, Sara Kokkila Schumacher, Steve H. Langer, Hai Le, Naoya Maruyama, Xinyu Que, David F. Richards, Björn Sjögreen, Jonathan Wong, Carol S. Woodward, Ulrike Meier Yang, Bob Anderson, David Appelhans, Levi Barnes, Peter D. Barnes Jr., Sorin Bastea, David Böhme, Jamie A. Bramwell, James M. Brase, José R. Brunheroto, Barry Chen, Charway R. Cooper, Tony Degroot, Robert D. Falgout, Todd Gamblin, David J. Gardner, James N. Glosli, John A. Gunnels, Max P. Katz, Tzanio V. Kolev, I-Feng W. Kuo, Matthew P. LeGendre, Pei-Hung Lin, Shelby Lockhart, Kathleen McCandless, Claudia Misale, Jaime H. Moreno, Rob Neely, Jarom Nelson, Rao Nimmakayala, Kathryn M. O'Brien, Kevin O'Brien, Ramesh Pankajakshan, Roger A. Pearce, Slaven Peles, Phil Regier, Steven C. Rennich, Martin Schulz 0001, Howard Scott, James C. Sexton, Kathleen Shoga, Shiv Sundram, Guillaume Thomas-Collignon, Brian Van Essen, Alexey Voronin, Bob Walkup, Chris Ward, Hui-Fang Wen, Daniel A. White, Christopher Young, Cyril Zeller, Edward Zywicz
SC42
2019 A massively parallel infrastructure for adaptive multiscale simulations: modeling RAS initiation pathway for cancer
abstract
Computational models can define the functional dynamics of complex systems in exceptional detail. However, many modeling studies face seemingly incommensurate requirements: to gain meaningful insights into some phenomena requires models with high resolution (microscopic) detail that must nevertheless evolve over large (macroscopic) length- and time-scales. Multiscale modeling has become increasingly important to bridge this gap. Executing complex multiscale models on current petascale computers with high levels of parallelism and heterogeneous architectures is challenging. Many distinct types of resources need to be simultaneously managed, such as GPUs and CPUs, memory size and latencies, communication bottlenecks, and filesystem bandwidth. In addition, robustness to failure of compute nodes, network, and filesystems is critical.
Francesco Di Natale, Harsh Bhatia, Timothy S. Carpenter, Chris Neale, Sara Kokkila Schumacher, Tomas Oppelstrup, Liam Stanton, Shiv Sundram, Thomas Scogland, Gautham Dharuman, Michael P. Surh, Yue Yang 0034, Claudia Misale, Lars Schneidenbach, Carlos H. A. Costa, Changhoan Kim, Bruce D'Amora, Sandrasegaram Gnanakaran, Dwight V. Nissley, Frederick H. Streitz, Felice C. Lightstone, Peer-Timo Bremer, James N. Glosli, Helgi I. Ingólfsson
SC24
2013 Analysis of scalable data-privatization threading algorithms for hybrid MPI/OpenMP parallelization of molecular dynamics
Manaschai Kunaseth, David F. Richards, James N. Glosli, Rajiv K. Kalia, Aiichiro Nakano, Priya Vashishta
J. Supercomput.3
2012 Toward real-time modeling of human heart ventricles at cellular resolution: simulation of drug-induced arrhythmias
abstract
We have developed a highly efficient and scalable cardiac electrophysiology simulation capability that supports groundbreaking resolution and detail to elucidate the mechanisms of sudden cardiac death from arrhythmia. We can simulate thousands of heartbeats at a resolution of 0.1 mm, comparable to the size of cardiac cells, thereby enabling scientific inquiry not previously possible. Based on scaling results from the partially deployed Sequoia IBM Blue Gene/Q machine at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and planned optimizations, we estimate that by SC12 we will simulate 8 -- 10 heartbeats per minute -- a time-to-solution 400 -- 500 times faster than the state-of-the-art. Performance between 8 and 11 PFlop/s on the full 1,572,864 cores is anticipated, representing 40 -- 55 percent of peak. The power of the model is demonstrated by illuminating the subtle arrhythmogenic mechanisms of anti-arrhythmic drugs that paradoxically increase arrhythmias in some patient populations.
Arthur A. Mirin, David F. Richards, James N. Glosli, Erik W. Draeger, Bor Chan, Jean-Luc Fattebert, William D. Krauss, Tomas Oppelstrup, John Jeremy Rice, John A. Gunnels, Viatcheslav Gurev, Changhoan Kim, John Magerlein, Matthias Reumann, Hui-Fang Wen
SC3
2009 Beyond homogeneous decomposition: scaling long-range forces on Massively Parallel Systems
abstract
With supercomputers anticipated to expand from thousands to millions of cores, one of the challenges facing scientists is how to effectively utilize this ever-increasing number. We report here an approach that creates a heterogeneous decomposition by partitioning effort according to the scaling properties of the component algorithms. We demonstrate our strategy by developing a capability to model hot dense plasma. We have performed benchmark calculations ranging from millions to billions of charged particles, including a 2.8 billion particle simulation that achieved 259.9 TFlop/s (26% of peak performance) on the 294,912 cpu JUGENE computer at the Jülich Supercomputing Centre in Germany. With this unprecedented simulation capability we have begun an investigation of plasma fusion physics under conditions where both theory and experiment are lacking--in the strongly-coupled regime as the plasma begins to burn.
David F. Richards, James N. Glosli, Bor Chan, Milo R. Dorr, Erik W. Draeger, Jean-Luc Fattebert, William D. Krauss, Thomas E. Spelce, Frederick H. Streitz, Michael P. Surh, John A. Gunnels
SC2
2007 Extending stability beyond CPU millennium: a micron-scale atomistic simulation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instability
abstract
We report the computational advances that have enabled the first micron-scale simulation of a Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH) instability using molecular dynamics (MD). The advances are in three key areas for massively parallel computation such as on BlueGene/L (BG/L): fault tolerance, application kernel optimization, and highly efficient parallel I/O. In particular, we have developed novel capabilities for handling hardware parity errors and improving the speed of interatomic force calculations, while achieving near optimal I/O speeds on BG/L, allowing us to achieve excellent scalability and improve overall application performance. As a result we have successfully conducted a 2-billion atom KH simulation amounting to 2.8 CPU-millennia of run time, including a single, continuous simulation run in excess of 1.5 CPU-millennia. We have also conducted 9-billion and 62.5-billion atom KH simulations. The current optimized ddcMD code is benchmarked at 115.1 TFlop/s in our scaling study and 103.9 TFlop/s in a sustained science run, with additional improvements ongoing. These improvements enabled us to run the first MD simulations of micron-scale systems developing the KH instability.
James N. Glosli, David F. Richards, K. J. Caspersen, R. E. Rudd, John A. Gunnels, Frederick H. Streitz
SC1
2005 Scaling physics and material science applications on a massively parallel Blue Gene/L system
abstract
Blue Gene/L represents a new way to build supercomputers, using a large number of low power processors, together with multiple integrated interconnection networks. Whether real applications can scale to tens of thousands of processors (on a machine like Blue Gene/L) has been an open question. In this paper, we describe early experience with several physics and material science applications on a 32,768 node Blue Gene/L system, which was installed recently at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Our study shows some problems in the applications and in the current software implementation, but overall, excellent scaling of these applications to 32K nodes on the current Blue Gene/L system. While there is clearly room for improvement, these results represent the first proof point that MPI applications can effectively scale to over ten thousand processors. They also validate the scalability of the hardware and software architecture of Blue Gene/L.
Gheorghe Almási 0001, Gyan Bhanot, Alan Gara, Manish Gupta 0002, James C. Sexton, Robert Walkup, Vasily V. Bulatov, Andrew W. Cook, Bronis R. de Supinski, James N. Glosli, Jeffrey A. Greenough, François Gygi, Alison Kubota, Steve Louis, Thomas E. Spelce, Frederick H. Streitz, Peter L. Williams, Robert K. Yates, Charles Archer, José E. Moreira, Charles A. Rendleman
ICS10