Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yaling Zheng

dblp:68/1231 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 67% Machine learning and data management · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
active learning
0.112010
Active Learning from Multiple Noisy Labelers with Varied Costs · ICDM 2010
Data mining
crowdsourcing
0.112010
Active Learning from Multiple Noisy Labelers with Varied Costs · ICDM 2010
Data mining › crowdsourcing
noisy label aggregation
0.112010
Active Learning from Multiple Noisy Labelers with Varied Costs · ICDM 2010
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.112007
Bandit-Based Algorithms for Budgeted Learning · ICDM 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pruning · 0.1labeler accuracy estimation · 0.1adjusted cost · 0.1multi-armed bandit algorithms · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 New algorithms for budgeted learning
Yaling Zheng, Chris Bourke, Stephen D. Scott 0001, Julie Masciale
Mach. Learn.2
2010 Active Learning from Multiple Noisy Labelers with Varied Costs
abstract
In active learning, where a learning algorithm has to purchase the labels of its training examples, it is often assumed that there is only one labeler available to label examples, and that this labeler is noise-free. In reality, it is possible that there are multiple labelers available (such as human labelers in the online annotation tool Amazon Mechanical Turk) and that each such labeler has a different cost and accuracy. We address the active learning problem with multiple labelers where each labeler has a different (known) cost and a different (unknown) accuracy. Our approach uses the idea of adjusted cost, which allows labelers with different costs and accuracies to be directly compared. This allows our algorithm to find low-cost combinations of labelers that result in high-accuracy labelings of instances. Our algorithm further reduces costs by pruning under-performing labelers from the set under consideration, and by halting the process of estimating the accuracy of the labelers as early as it can. We found that our algorithm often outperforms, and is always competitive with, other algorithms in the literature.
Yaling Zheng, Stephen D. Scott 0001
ICDM1
2007 Bandit-Based Algorithms for Budgeted Learning
abstract
We explore the problem of budgeted machine learning, in which the learning algorithm has free access to the training examples' labels but has to pay for each attribute that is specified. This learning model is appropriate in many areas, including medical applications. We present new algorithms for choosing which attributes to purchase of which examples in the budgeted learning model based on algorithms for the multi-armed bandit problem. All of our approaches outperformed the current state of the art. Furthermore, we present a new means for selecting an example to purchase after the attribute is selected, instead of selecting an example uniformly at random, which is typically done. Our new example selection method improved performance of all the algorithms we tested, both ours and those in the literature.
Chris Bourke, Stephen D. Scott 0001, Julie Sunderman, Yaling Zheng
ICDM5
2005 Applying Decomposition Methods to Crossword Puzzle Problems
Yaling Zheng, Berthe Y. Choueiry
CP1