Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Younghoo Lee

dblp:68/249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Requirements engineering and software design · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › release engineering
continuous integration
0.112008
Automated Continuous Integration of Component-Based Software: An Industrial Experience · ASE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design
component-based software
0.012008
Automated Continuous Integration of Component-Based Software: An Industrial Experience · ASE 2008
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Automated Continuous Integration of Component-Based Software: An Industrial Experience
abstract
When a software product is composed of dozens of or even hundreds of components with complicated dependency relationship among each other, one component's change can affect lots of other components' behavior. Sometimes, therefore, the stabilization job with multiple updated components drives the people who are responsible for integration and release the software into an integration hell. To avoid this kind of integration hell, we established integration procedure which encourages the developers frequent and small releases. We also created an automated integration system which continuously runs integration process in an incremental way so as to create and maintain an up-to-minute reasonably stable version of the product release candidate. In this paper, we introduce our integration procedure and automated integration system for a software product with hundreds of components, and a few lessons learned from the implementing and applying the system as well.
Jeonghyun Yun, Younghoo Lee
ASE4