Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tariq Al-Naeem
dblp:68/3547
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › architectural design
architectural decision making |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A quality-driven systematic approach for architecting distributed software applications · ICSE 2005 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A quality-driven systematic approach for architecting distributed software applications · ICSE 2005 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | A quality-driven systematic approach for architecting distributed software applications · ICSE 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimization techniques · 0.1case study · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | A quality-driven systematic approach for architecting distributed software applicationsabstractArchitecting distributed software applications is a complex design activity. It involves making decisions about a number of inter-dependent design choices that relate to a range of design concerns. Each decision requires selecting among a number of alternatives; each of which impacts differently on various quality attributes. Additionally, there are usually a number of stakeholders participating in the decision-making process with different, often conflicting, quality goals, and project constraints, such as cost and schedule. To facilitate the architectural design process, we propose a quantitative quality-driven approach that attempts to find the best possible fit between conflicting stakeholders' quality goals, competing architectural concerns, and project constraints. The approach uses optimization techniques to recommend the optimal candidate architecture. Applicability of the proposed approach is assessed using a real system. Tariq Al-Naeem, Ian Gorton, Muhammad Ali Babar 0001, Fethi A. Rabhi, Boualem Benatallah |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2005 | A Framework for Identifying Architectural Patterns for E-Business Applications
Feras T. Dabous, Fethi A. Rabhi, Tariq Al-Naeem |
WEBIST | 3 |