Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hervé Avril

dblp:68/3848 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 70% Distributed systems · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
parallel discrete event simulation
0.012001
On Rolling Back and Checkpointing in Time Warp · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
rollback recovery
0.012001
On Rolling Back and Checkpointing in Time Warp · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation › parallel discrete event simulation › optimistic simulation
time warp
0.012001
On Rolling Back and Checkpointing in Time Warp · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.012001
On Rolling Back and Checkpointing in Time Warp · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rollback · 0.0clustering · 0.0checkpointing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 On Rolling Back and Checkpointing in Time Warp
abstract
In this paper, we present a family of three algorithms which serve to perform checkpoints and to roll back time warp. These algorithms are primarily intended for use in simulations in which there are a large number of LPs and in which events have a small computational granularity. Important representatives of this class are VLSI and computer network simulations. In each of our algorithms, LPs are gathered into clusters via algorithms which are application dependent. In order to examine the performance of our algorithms and to compare them to Time Warp, we made use of two of the largest digital logic circuits available from the ISCAS89 benchmark series of combinational circuits. The execution time, number of states saved, and maximal memory consumption were compared to the same quantities for time warp. Our results indicated that each of the algorithms occupies a different point in the spectrum of possible trade-offs between memory usage and execution time, ranging from substantial memory savings (at a comparable cost in speed) to memory savings and a comparable speed to time warp. Hence, an important benefit of our algorithms is the ability to trade off memory requirements with execution time.
Hervé Avril, Carl Tropper
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.1