Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
K. Sarrigeorgidis
dblp:68/4048
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 91% Legged, aerial and field robots · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Motion Control of the N.T.U.A. Robotic Snake on a Planar Surface · ICRA 1998 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
stabilization |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Motion Control of the N.T.U.A. Robotic Snake on a Planar Surface · ICRA 1998 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Motion Control of the N.T.U.A. Robotic Snake on a Planar Surface · ICRA 1998 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bio-inspired robot
snake robot |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Motion Control of the N.T.U.A. Robotic Snake on a Planar Surface · ICRA 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kinematic model · 0.0flat systems · 0.0dynamic state feedback · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Motion Control of the N.T.U.A. Robotic Snake on a Planar SurfaceabstractWe extend our previous work (1997, 1998) on steering a robotic snake and we now address the problems of (i) stabilization about an arbitrary configuration and (ii) tracking an arbitrary trajectory. For stabilization we apply three different algorithms for the kinematic model derived in the previous work. Comparisons of the three feedback stabilizing controls are made. Trajectory tracking is firstly addressed under the notion of flat systems. In a second approach we make use of a dynamic state feedback in order to achieve dynamic decoupling of our system. K. Sarrigeorgidis, Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos |
ICRA | 1 |