Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tah-Yuan Kuo

dblp:68/4709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 97% Integrated circuit design · 3%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.031992
Enhancing the multiple-fault detection of single-fault test sets · Comput. Aided Des. 1992
A Fault Analysis Method for Synchronous Sequential Circuits · DAC 1990
A New Approach to Derive Robust Sets for Stuck-open Faults in CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · DAC 1989
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault detection
0.011992
Enhancing the multiple-fault detection of single-fault test sets · Comput. Aided Des. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault detection
multiple fault detection
0.011992
Enhancing the multiple-fault detection of single-fault test sets · Comput. Aided Des. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault analysis
0.011990
A Fault Analysis Method for Synchronous Sequential Circuits · DAC 1990
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault modeling
0.011989
A New Approach to Derive Robust Sets for Stuck-open Faults in CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · DAC 1989
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault testing
stuck-open fault testing
0.011989
A New Approach to Derive Robust Sets for Stuck-open Faults in CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · DAC 1989
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › test generation
single fault test sets
0.011992
Enhancing the multiple-fault detection of single-fault test sets · Comput. Aided Des. 1992
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.011992
Enhancing the multiple-fault detection of single-fault test sets · Comput. Aided Des. 1992
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › combinational logic
CMOS combinational logic
0.011989
A New Approach to Derive Robust Sets for Stuck-open Faults in CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · DAC 1989
Electronic design automation › hardware test
two-pattern testing
0.011989
A New Approach to Derive Robust Sets for Stuck-open Faults in CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits · DAC 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

iterative array model · 0.0forward propagation · 0.0backward implication · 0.0sufficient and necessary condition · 0.0robust test derivation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Enhancing the multiple-fault detection of single-fault test sets
Tah-Yuan Kuo, Jhing-Fa Wang, Jau-Yien Lee
Comput. Aided Des.1
1990 A Fault Analysis Method for Synchronous Sequential Circuits
abstract
In this paper we extend the use of the fault analysis method dealing with combinational circuits[1] to synchronous sequential circuits. Using the iterative array model, extended forward propagation and backward implication are performed. based on the observed values at primary outputs, to deduce the actual values of each line to determine its fault status. Any stuck fault can be identified, even in a circuit without any initialization sequence. A fault which is covered is tested unconditionally; thus the results obtained would not be invalidated in the presence of untested or untestable lines. Examples will be given to demonstrate the ability of our method.
Tah-Yuan Kuo, Jau-Yien Lee, Jhing-Fa Wang
DAC1
1989 A New Approach to Derive Robust Sets for Stuck-open Faults in CMOS Combinational Logic Circuits
abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of deriving robust tests for single stuck-open faults in CMOS combinational circuits. We first examine the characteristics of the transition of the two patterns belonging to a two-pattern test. Then, a sufficient and necessary condition for a test to be robust is given. According to the given condition, we propose a new method to derive robust tests. Robustness verification of the derived tests is no longer required when using our approach.
Jhing-Fa Wang, Tah-Yuan Kuo, Jau-Yien Lee
DAC2