Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aidan Budd

dblp:68/6033 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0003-0196-9051ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 7 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computing education · 57% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 43%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
bioinformatics training
0.212015
The GOBLET training portal: a global repository of bioinformatics training materials, courses and trainers · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

portal development · 0.2widget integration · 0.2web services · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 The GOBLET training portal: a global repository of bioinformatics training materials, courses and trainers
abstract
SUMMARY: Rapid technological advances have led to an explosion of biomedical data in recent years. The pace of change has inspired new collaborative approaches for sharing materials and resources to help train life scientists both in the use of cutting-edge bioinformatics tools and databases and in how to analyse and interpret large datasets. A prototype platform for sharing such training resources was recently created by the Bioinformatics Training Network (BTN). Building on this work, we have created a centralized portal for sharing training materials and courses, including a catalogue of trainers and course organizers, and an announcement service for training events. For course organizers, the portal provides opportunities to promote their training events; for trainers, the portal offers an environment for sharing materials, for gaining visibility for their work and promoting their skills; for trainees, it offers a convenient one-stop shop for finding suitable training resources and identifying relevant training events and activities locally and worldwide. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://mygoblet.org/training-portal.
Manuel Corpas, Rafael C. Jiménez, Erik Bongcam-Rudloff, Aidan Budd, Michelle D. Brazas, Pedro L. Fernandes, Bruno A. Gaëta, Celia W. G. van Gelder, Eija Korpelainen, Fran Lewitter, Annette McGrath, Daniel MacLean, Patricia M. Palagi, Kristian Rother, Jan Taylor, Allegra Via, Mick Watson, Maria Victoria Schneider, Terri K. Attwood
Bioinform.4
2015 A Quick Guide for Building a Successful Bioinformatics Community
abstract
"Scientific community" refers to a group of people collaborating together on scientific-research-related activities who also share common goals, interests, and values. Such communities play a key role in many bioinformatics activities. Communities may be linked to a specific location or institute, or involve people working at many different institutions and locations. Education and training is typically an important component of these communities, providing a valuable context in which to develop skills and expertise, while also strengthening links and relationships within the community. Scientific communities facilitate: (i) the exchange and development of ideas and expertise; (ii) career development; (iii) coordinated funding activities; (iv) interactions and engagement with professionals from other fields; and (v) other activities beneficial to individual participants, communities, and the scientific field as a whole. It is thus beneficial at many different levels to understand the general features of successful, high-impact bioinformatics communities; how individual participants can contribute to the success of these communities; and the role of education and training within these communities. We present here a quick guide to building and maintaining a successful, high-impact bioinformatics community, along with an overview of the general benefits of participating in such communities. This article grew out of contributions made by organizers, presenters, panelists, and other participants of the ISMB/ECCB 2013 workshop "The 'How To Guide' for Establishing a Successful Bioinformatics Network" at the 21st Annual International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB) and the 12th European Conference on Computational Biology (ECCB).
Aidan Budd, Manuel Corpas, Michelle D. Brazas, Jonathan C. Fuller, Jeremy Goecks, Nicola J. Mulder, Magali Michaut, B. F. Francis Ouellette, Aleksandra Pawlik, Niklas Blomberg
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2015 Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an Unconference
abstract
An academic conference is a traditional platform for researchers and professionals to network and learn about recent developments and trends in a particular academic field [1–4]. Typically, the organizing committees and sponsors decide the main theme and sub-topics of the conference and select the presenters based on peer-reviewed papers [5]. The selected speakers usually share their research with a large audience by means of presentations and posters. However, the most stimulating discussions generally take place over coffee breaks when attendees can interact with each other and discuss various topics, including their own research interests, in a more informal manner [1, 6, 7], while expanding their own professional networks. An emphasis on facilitating such informal/networking interactions is a central focus of “unconventional conferences”—or “unconferences.”
Aidan Budd, Holger Dinkel, Manuel Corpas, Jonathan C. Fuller, Laura Rubinat-Ripoll, Damien Devos, Pierre H. Khoueiry, Konrad U. Förstner, Fotis Georgatos, Francis Rowland, Malvika Sharan, Janos X. Binder, Tom Grace, Karyn Traphagen, Adam Gristwood, Natasha T. Wood
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2013 Best practices in bioinformatics training for life scientists
abstract
The mountains of data thrusting from the new landscape of modern high-throughput biology are irrevocably changing biomedical research and creating a near-insatiable demand for training in data management and manipulation and data mining and analysis. Among life scientists, from clinicians to environmental researchers, a common theme is the need not just to use, and gain familiarity with, bioinformatics tools and resources but also to understand their underlying fundamental theoretical and practical concepts. Providing bioinformatics training to empower life scientists to handle and analyse their data efficiently, and progress their research, is a challenge across the globe. Delivering good training goes beyond traditional lectures and resource-centric demos, using interactivity, problem-solving exercises and cooperative learning to substantially enhance training quality and learning outcomes. In this context, this article discusses various pragmatic criteria for identifying training needs and learning objectives, for selecting suitable trainees and trainers, for developing and maintaining training skills and evaluating training quality. Adherence to these criteria may help not only to guide course organizers and trainers on the path towards bioinformatics training excellence but, importantly, also to improve the training experience for life scientists.
Allegra Via, Thomas Blicher, Erik Bongcam-Rudloff, Michelle D. Brazas, Catherine Brooksbank, Aidan Budd, Javier De Las Rivas, Jacqueline Dreyer, Pedro L. Fernandes, Celia W. G. van Gelder, Joachim Jacob, Rafael C. Jiménez, Jane E. Loveland, Federico Morán, Nicola J. Mulder, Tommi H. Nyrönen, Kristian Rother, Maria Victoria Schneider, Terri K. Attwood
Briefings Bioinform.6
2013 iAnn: an event sharing platform for the life sciences
abstract
SUMMARY: We present iAnn, an open source community-driven platform for dissemination of life science events, such as courses, conferences and workshops. iAnn allows automatic visualisation and integration of customised event reports. A central repository lies at the core of the platform: curators add submitted events, and these are subsequently accessed via web services. Thus, once an iAnn widget is incorporated into a website, it permanently shows timely relevant information as if it were native to the remote site. At the same time, announcements submitted to the repository are automatically disseminated to all portals that query the system. To facilitate the visualization of announcements, iAnn provides powerful filtering options and views, integrated in Google Maps and Google Calendar. All iAnn widgets are freely available. AVAILABILITY: http://iann.pro/iannviewer CONTACT: [email protected].
Rafael C. Jiménez, Juan P. Albar, Jong Bhak, Marie-Claude Blatter, Thomas Blicher, Michelle D. Brazas, Catherine Brooksbank, Aidan Budd, Javier De Las Rivas, Jacqueline Dreyer, Marc A. van Driel, Michael J. Dunn, Pedro L. Fernandes, Celia W. G. van Gelder, Henning Hermjakob, Vassilios Ioannidis, David Phillip Judge, Pascal Kahlem, Eija Korpelainen, Hans-Joachim Kraus, Jane E. Loveland, Christine Mayer, Jennifer McDowall, Federico Morán, Nicola J. Mulder, Tommi H. Nyrönen, Kristian Rother, Gustavo A. Salazar, Reinhard Schneider 0002, Allegra Via, Jose M. Villaveces, Maria Victoria Schneider, Terri K. Attwood, Manuel Corpas
Bioinform.8
2012 Bioinformatics Training Network (BTN): a community resource for bioinformatics trainers
abstract
Funding bodies are increasingly recognizing the need to provide graduates and researchers with access to short intensive courses in a variety of disciplines, in order both to improve the general skills base and to provide solid foundations on which researchers may build their careers. In response to the development of 'high-throughput biology', the need for training in the field of bioinformatics, in particular, is seeing a resurgence: it has been defined as a key priority by many Institutions and research programmes and is now an important component of many grant proposals. Nevertheless, when it comes to planning and preparing to meet such training needs, tension arises between the reward structures that predominate in the scientific community which compel individuals to publish or perish, and the time that must be devoted to the design, delivery and maintenance of high-quality training materials. Conversely, there is much relevant teaching material and training expertise available worldwide that, were it properly organized, could be exploited by anyone who needs to provide training or needs to set up a new course. To do this, however, the materials would have to be centralized in a database and clearly tagged in relation to target audiences, learning objectives, etc. Ideally, they would also be peer reviewed, and easily and efficiently accessible for downloading. Here, we present the Bioinformatics Training Network (BTN), a new enterprise that has been initiated to address these needs and review it, respectively, to similar initiatives and collections.
Maria Victoria Schneider, Peter Walter, Marie-Claude Blatter, James Watson, Michelle D. Brazas, Kristian Rother, Aidan Budd, Allegra Via, Celia W. G. van Gelder, Joachim Jacob, Pedro L. Fernandes, Tommi H. Nyrönen, Javier De Las Rivas, Thomas Blicher, Rafael C. Jiménez, Jane E. Loveland, Jennifer McDowall, Philip Jones, Brendan W. Vaughan, Rodrigo Lopez, Terri K. Attwood, Catherine Brooksbank
Briefings Bioinform.7
2010 Bioinformatics training: a review of challenges, actions and support requirements
abstract
As bioinformatics becomes increasingly central to research in the molecular life sciences, the need to train non-bioinformaticians to make the most of bioinformatics resources is growing. Here, we review the key challenges and pitfalls to providing effective training for users of bioinformatics services, and discuss successful training strategies shared by a diverse set of bioinformatics trainers. We also identify steps that trainers in bioinformatics could take together to advance the state of the art in current training practices. The ideas presented in this article derive from the first Trainer Networking Session held under the auspices of the EU-funded SLING Integrating Activity, which took place in November 2009.
Maria Victoria Schneider, James Watson, Terri K. Attwood, Kristian Rother, Aidan Budd, Jennifer McDowall, Allegra Via, Pedro L. Fernandes, Tommi H. Nyrönen, Thomas Blicher, Philip Jones, Marie-Claude Blatter, Javier De Las Rivas, David Phillip Judge, Wouter van der Gool, Catherine Brooksbank
Briefings Bioinform.5