Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Laurence Bisht

dblp:68/6518 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
exact learning
0.112006
On Optimal Learning Algorithms for Multiplicity Automata · COLT 2006
Computational complexity
learning theory
0.012004
Learning with Errors in Answers to Membership Queries · FOCS 2004
Computational complexity › lattice problems
learning with errors
0.012004
Learning with Errors in Answers to Membership Queries · FOCS 2004
Computational complexity › learning theory › exact learning
membership query learning
0.012004
Learning with Errors in Answers to Membership Queries · FOCS 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

query learning · 0.1equivalence queries · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Learning with errors in answers to membership queries
Laurence Bisht, Nader H. Bshouty, Lawrance Khoury
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
2006 On Optimal Learning Algorithms for Multiplicity Automata
Laurence Bisht, Nader H. Bshouty, Hanna Mazzawi
COLT1
2004 Learning with Errors in Answers to Membership Queries
abstract
We study the learning models defined by Angluin et al. (1997): learning with equivalence and limited membership queries and learning with equivalence and malicious membership queries. We show that if a class of concepts that is closed under projection is learnable in polynomial time using equivalence and (standard) membership queries then it is learnable in polynomial time in the above models. This closes the open problems by Angluin et al. (1997). Our algorithm can also handle errors in the equivalence queries.
Laurence Bisht, Nader H. Bshouty, Lawrance Khoury
FOCS1