Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joel D. Martin
dblp:69/1406
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Machine translation · 74% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 6% Efficient and distributed learning · 5% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improving Translation Quality by Discarding Most of the Phrasetable · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Improving Translation Quality by Discarding Most of the Phrasetable · EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Student assessment using Bayesian nets · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1995 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
bias-variance tradeoff |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Variability Bias and Category Learning · ML 1991 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
category learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Variability Bias and Category Learning · ML 1991 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Focusing Attention for Observational Learning: The Importance of Context · IJCAI 1989 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
efficient learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Reducing Redundant Learning · ML 1989 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Focusing Attention for Observational Learning: The Importance of Context · IJCAI 1989 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Reducing Redundant Learning · ML 1989 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
observational learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Focusing Attention for Observational Learning: The Importance of Context · IJCAI 1989 |
Computing education › educational assessment
student assessment |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Student assessment using Bayesian nets · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
phrasetable pruning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Sentiment, emotion, purpose, and style in electoral tweets
Saif M. Mohammad, Xiaodan Zhu 0001, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Joel D. Martin |
Inf. Process. Manag. | 4 |
| 2013 | À la Recherche du Temps Perdu: extracting temporal relations from medical text in the 2012 i2b2 NLP challengeabstractOBJECTIVE: An analysis of the timing of events is critical for a deeper understanding of the course of events within a patient record. The 2012 i2b2 NLP challenge focused on the extraction of temporal relationships between concepts within textual hospital discharge summaries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The team from the National Research Council Canada (NRC) submitted three system runs to the second track of the challenge: typifying the time-relationship between pre-annotated entities. The NRC system was designed around four specialist modules containing statistical machine learning classifiers. Each specialist targeted distinct sets of relationships: local relationships, 'sectime'-type relationships, non-local overlap-type relationships, and non-local causal relationships. RESULTS: The best NRC submission achieved a precision of 0.7499, a recall of 0.6431, and an F1 score of 0.6924, resulting in a statistical tie for first place. Post hoc improvements led to a precision of 0.7537, a recall of 0.6455, and an F1 score of 0.6954, giving the highest scores reported on this task to date. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Methods for general relation extraction extended well to temporal relations, and gave top-ranked state-of-the-art results. Careful ordering of predictions within result sets proved critical to this success. Colin Cherry, Xiaodan Zhu 0001, Joel D. Martin, Berry de Bruijn |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 3 |
| 2013 | Detecting concept relations in clinical text: Insights from a state-of-the-art model
Xiaodan Zhu 0001, Colin Cherry, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Joel D. Martin, Berry de Bruijn |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 4 |
| 2011 | Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010abstractOBJECTIVE: As clinical text mining continues to mature, its potential as an enabling technology for innovations in patient care and clinical research is becoming a reality. A critical part of that process is rigid benchmark testing of natural language processing methods on realistic clinical narrative. In this paper, the authors describe the design and performance of three state-of-the-art text-mining applications from the National Research Council of Canada on evaluations within the 2010 i2b2 challenge. DESIGN: The three systems perform three key steps in clinical information extraction: (1) extraction of medical problems, tests, and treatments, from discharge summaries and progress notes; (2) classification of assertions made on the medical problems; (3) classification of relations between medical concepts. Machine learning systems performed these tasks using large-dimensional bags of features, as derived from both the text itself and from external sources: UMLS, cTAKES, and Medline. MEASUREMENTS: Performance was measured per subtask, using micro-averaged F-scores, as calculated by comparing system annotations with ground-truth annotations on a test set. RESULTS: The systems ranked high among all submitted systems in the competition, with the following F-scores: concept extraction 0.8523 (ranked first); assertion detection 0.9362 (ranked first); relationship detection 0.7313 (ranked second). CONCLUSION: For all tasks, we found that the introduction of a wide range of features was crucial to success. Importantly, our choice of machine learning algorithms allowed us to be versatile in our feature design, and to introduce a large number of features without overfitting and without encountering computing-resource bottlenecks. Berry de Bruijn, Colin Cherry, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Joel D. Martin, Xiaodan Zhu 0001 |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 4 |
| 2008 | Automated Information Extraction of Key Trial Design Elements from Clinical Trial Publications
Berry de Bruijn, Simona Carini, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Joel D. Martin, Ida Sim |
AMIA | 4 |
| 2007 | Improving Translation Quality by Discarding Most of the Phrasetable
Howard Johnson, Joel D. Martin, George F. Foster, Roland Kuhn 0001 |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 2 |
| 2006 | Case Report: Identifying Wrist Fracture Patients with High Accuracy by Automatic Categorization of X-ray ReportsabstractThe authors performed this study to determine the accuracy of several text classification methods to categorize wrist x-ray reports. We randomly sampled 751 textual wrist x-ray reports. Two expert reviewers rated the presence (n = 301) or absence (n = 450) of an acute fracture of wrist. We developed two information retrieval (IR) text classification methods and a machine learning method using a support vector machine (TC-1). In cross-validation on the derivation set (n = 493), TC-1 outperformed the two IR based methods and six benchmark classifiers, including Naive Bayes and a Neural Network. In the validation set (n = 258), TC-1 demonstrated consistent performance with 93.8% accuracy; 95.5% sensitivity; 92.9% specificity; and 87.5% positive predictive value. TC-1 was easy to implement and superior in performance to the other classification methods. Berry de Bruijn, Ann Cranney, Siobhan O'Donnell, Joel D. Martin, Alan J. Forster |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 4 |
| 2003 | Unsupervised Learning of Morphology for English and Inuktitut
Howard Johnson, Joel D. Martin |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2003 | PreBIND and Textomy - mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machineabstractBACKGROUND: The majority of experimentally verified molecular interaction and biological pathway data are present in the unstructured text of biomedical journal articles where they are inaccessible to computational methods. The Biomolecular interaction network database (BIND) seeks to capture these data in a machine-readable format. We hypothesized that the formidable task-size of backfilling the database could be reduced by using Support Vector Machine technology to first locate interaction information in the literature. We present an information extraction system that was designed to locate protein-protein interaction data in the literature and present these data to curators and the public for review and entry into BIND. RESULTS: Cross-validation estimated the support vector machine's test-set precision, accuracy and recall for classifying abstracts describing interaction information was 92%, 90% and 92% respectively. We estimated that the system would be able to recall up to 60% of all non-high throughput interactions present in another yeast-protein interaction database. Finally, this system was applied to a real-world curation problem and its use was found to reduce the task duration by 70% thus saving 176 days. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning methods are useful as tools to direct interaction and pathway database back-filling; however, this potential can only be realized if these techniques are coupled with human review and entry into a factual database such as BIND. The PreBIND system described here is available to the public at http://bind.ca. Current capabilities allow searching for human, mouse and yeast protein-interaction information. Ian M. Donaldson, Joel D. Martin, Berry de Bruijn, Cheryl Wolting, Vicki Lay, Brigitte Tuekam, Shudong Zhang, Berivan Baskin, Gary D. Bader, Katerina Michalickova, Tony Pawson, Christopher W. V. Hogue |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 1995 | Student assessment using Bayesian nets
Joel D. Martin, Kurt VanLehn |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |
| 1994 | DP 1: Supervised and Unsupervised Clustering
Joel D. Martin |
ECML | 1 |
| 1994 | Acquiring and Combining Overlapping Concepts
Joel D. Martin, Dorrit Billman |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 1991 | Variability Bias and Category Learning
Joel D. Martin, Dorrit Billman |
ML | 1 |
| 1989 | Reducing Redundant Learning
Joel D. Martin |
ML | 1 |
| 1989 | Focusing Attention for Observational Learning: The Importance of Context
Joel D. Martin |
IJCAI | 1 |