Sujatha Muthulingam

dblp:69/1752 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Distributed and cloud data management · 42% Database system architecture and tuning · 39% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 12%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Storage systems · 93% Performance modeling and evaluation · 7%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning
main-memory database
0.522016
Fault-tolerant real-time analytics with distributed Oracle Database In-memory · ICDE 2016
Oracle Database In-Memory: A dual format in-memory database · ICDE 2015
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed query processing
0.212016
Fault-tolerant real-time analytics with distributed Oracle Database In-memory · ICDE 2016
Distributed and cloud data management › distributed query processing
fault-tolerant query execution
0.212016
Fault-tolerant real-time analytics with distributed Oracle Database In-memory · ICDE 2016
Storage systems › data management
database storage
0.222009
Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Oracle SecureFiles System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008
Storage systems › data management › database storage
semi-structured data storage
0.222009
Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Oracle SecureFiles System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.222009
Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Oracle SecureFiles System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008
Storage systems › transaction support
transactional storage
0.222009
Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Oracle SecureFiles System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008
Indexing and storage engines
columnar storage
0.112015
Oracle Database In-Memory: A dual format in-memory database · ICDE 2015
Transaction processing and concurrency control › consistency
transactional consistency
0.112015
Oracle Database In-Memory: A dual format in-memory database · ICDE 2015
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.012009
Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
storage benchmarking
0.012009
Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2009
Indexing and storage engines › storage management
storage architecture
0.012008
Oracle SecureFiles System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distribution-aware architecture · 0.2column format duplication · 0.2row-column dual format · 0.2deduplication · 0.2compression · 0.2performance evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Fault-tolerant real-time analytics with distributed Oracle Database In-memory
abstract
Modern data management systems are required to address new breeds of OLTAP applications. These applications demand real time analytical insights over massive data volumes not only on dedicated data warehouses but also on live mainstream production environments where data gets continuously ingested and modified. Oracle introduced the Database In-memory Option (DBIM) in 2014 as a unique dual row and column format architecture aimed to address the emerging space of mixed OLTAP applications along with traditional OLAP workloads. The architecture allows both the row format and the column format to be maintained simultaneously with strict transactional consistency. While the row format is persisted in underlying storage, the column format is maintained purely in-memory without incurring additional logging overheads in OLTP. Maintenance of columnar data purely in memory creates the need for distributed data management architectures. Performance of analytics incurs severe regressions in single server architectures during server failures as it takes non-trivial time to recover and rebuild terabytes of in-memory columnar format. A distributed and distribution aware architecture therefore becomes necessary to provide real time high availability of the columnar format for glitch-free in-memory analytic query execution across server failures and additions, besides providing scale out of capacity and compute to address real time throughput requirements over large volumes of in-memory data. In this paper, we will present the high availability aspects of the distributed architecture of Oracle DBIM that includes extremely scaled out application transparent column format duplication mechanism, distributed query execution on duplicated in-memory columnar format, and several scenarios of fault tolerant analytic query execution across the in-memory column format at various stages of redistribution of columnar data during cluster topology changes.
Niloy Mukherjee, Shasank Chavan, Maria Colgan, Mike Gleeson, Allison Holloway, Jesse Kamp, Kartik Kulkarni, Tirthankar Lahiri, Juan Loaiza, Neil MacNaughton, Atrayee Mullick, Sujatha Muthulingam, Vivekanandhan Raja, Raunak Rungta
ICDE13
2015 Oracle Database In-Memory: A dual format in-memory database
abstract
The Oracle Database In-Memory Option allows Oracle to function as the industry-first dual-format in-memory database. Row formats are ideal for OLTP workloads which typically use indexes to limit their data access to a small set of rows, while column formats are better suited for Analytic operations which typically examine a small number of columns from a large number of rows. Since no single data format is ideal for all types of workloads, our approach was to allow data to be simultaneously maintained in both formats with strict transactional consistency between them.
Tirthankar Lahiri, Shasank Chavan, Maria Colgan, Dinesh Das, Amit Ganesh, Mike Gleeson, Sanket Hase, Allison Holloway, Jesse Kamp, Teck-Hua Lee, Juan Loaiza, Neil MacNaughton, Vineet Marwah, Niloy Mukherjee, Atrayee Mullick, Sujatha Muthulingam, Vivekanandhan Raja, Marty Roth, Ekrem Soylemez, Mohamed Zaït
ICDE16
2009 Oracle SecureFiles: Prepared for the Digital Deluge
abstract
Digital unstructured data volumes across enterprise, Internet and multimedia applications are predicted to surpass 6.023x10 23 (Avogadro's number) bits a year in the next fifteen years. This poses tremendous scalability challenges for data management solutions in the coming decades. Filesystems seem to be preferred by data management application designers for providing storage solutions for such unstructured data volumes. Oracle SecureFiles is emerging as the database solution to break the performance barrier that has kept unstructured content out of database management systems and to provide advanced filesystem functionality, while letting applications fully leverage the strengths of the RDBMS from transactions to partitioning to rollforward recovery. A set of preliminary performance results was presented at the 34th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB 2008). It was claimed that SecureFiles would scale maximally as physical storage systems scale up. We legitimize our claims on SecureFiles scalability through this paper, presenting the scalability aspects of SecureFiles through a performance evaluation of I/O bound filesystem like operations on one of the latest high performance cluster of servers and storage. We are presenting benchmark results that we believe represent a world record database insertion rate for any published result - at over 4.4GB/S using a cluster of seven servers. For 100 byte rows, that represents an insertion rate of 45 billion records a second in relational terms. In terms of unstructured data storage, the scale represents an insertion rate of more than 3.7 million 100 MB high-resolution multimedia videos a day.
Niloy Mukherjee, Amit Ganesh, V. Djegaradjane, Sujatha Muthulingam, Wei Zhang 0051, Scott Lynn, Krishna Kunchithapadam, Bharath Aleti, Kam Shergill
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2008 Oracle SecureFiles System
abstract
Over the last decade, the nature of content stored on computer storage systems has evolved from being relational to being semi-structured, i.e., unstructured data accompanied by relational metadata. Average data volumes have increased from a few hundred megabytes to hundreds of terabytes. Simultaneously, data feed rates have also increased with increase in processor, storage and network bandwidths. Data growth trends seem to be following Moore's law and thereby imply an exponential explosion in content volumes and rates in the years to come. The near future poses requirements for data management systems to provide solutions that provide unlimited scalability in execution, availability, recoverability and storage usage of semi-structured content. Traditionally, filesystems have been preferred over database management systems for providing storage solutions for unstructured data, while databases have been the preferred choice to manage relational data. Lack of consolidated semi-structured content management architecture compromises security, availability, recoverability, and manageability among other features. We introduce a system without compromises, the Oracle SecureFiles System, designed to provide highly scalable storage and access execution of unstructured and structured content as first-class objects within the Oracle relational database management system. Oracle SecureFiles breaks the performance barrier that has kept such content out of databases. The architecture provides capability to maximize utilization of storage usage through compression and de-duplication and achieves robustness by preserving transactional atomicity, durability, availability, read-consistent query-ability and security of the database management system.
Niloy Mukherjee, Bharath Aleti, Amit Ganesh, Krishna Kunchithapadam, Scott Lynn, Sujatha Muthulingam, Kam Shergill, Wei Zhang 0051
Proc. VLDB Endow.6