Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Randall A. Cieslak

dblp:69/1922 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 50%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network measurement and analytics · 77% Network optimization and economics · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › delay analysis
mean delay analysis
0.011987
Randomized parallel communications on an extension of the omega network · J. ACM 1987
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011987
Randomized parallel communications on an extension of the omega network · J. ACM 1987
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › routing algorithms
randomized routing
0.011987
Randomized parallel communications on an extension of the omega network · J. ACM 1987
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › switching network › multistage interconnection network
shuffle-exchange network
0.011987
Randomized parallel communications on an extension of the omega network · J. ACM 1987
Network optimization and economics
network design
0.011989
The Programmable Network Prototyping System · INFOCOM 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized routing · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 The Programmable Network Prototyping System
abstract
The Programmable Network Prototyping System (PNPS), which is a rapid-prototyping tool used for emulating a wide variety of communication networks, is discussed. There are two parts to the PNPS hardware: the reusable hardware modules and the control and observation system. The reusable hardware modules consist of a channel emulator and a collection of node emulators. The channel emulator can be programmed to behave like a variety of network topologies, and each node emulator is configured to behave like a node on a network under study. The control and observation system links these modules together for configuration, experimentation, and monitoring purposes. There are three phases to using PNPS. first, the various components of a proposed network are designed. Next, the components are combined and run on the hardware while its behavior is monitored. Finally, the monitoring data is analyzed in order to evaluate the network design. A menu-driven user interface guides the user through the various tools of the system.>
Randall A. Cieslak, Ayman Fawaz, Sonia Sachs, Pravin Varaiya, Jean C. Walrand, Albert Li
INFOCOM1
1987 Randomized parallel communications on an extension of the omega network
abstract
Parallel communication algorithms and networks are central to large-scale parallel computing and, also, data communications. This paper identifies adverse source-destination traffic patterns and proposes a scheme for obtaining relief by means of randomized routing of packets on simple extensions of the well-known omega networks. Valiant and Aleliunas have demonstrated randomized algorithms, for a certain context which we call nonrenewal, that complete the communication task in time O (log N ) with overwhelming probability, where N is the number of sources and destinations. Our scheme has advantages because it uses switches of fixed degree, requires no scheduling, and, for the nonrenewal context, is as good in proven performance. The main advantage of our scheme comes when we consider the renewal context in which packets are generated at the sources continually and asynchronously. Our algorithm extends naturally from the nonrenewal context. In the analysis in the renewal context we, first, explicitly identify the maximum traffic intensities in the internal links of the extended omega networks over all source-destination traffic specifications that satisfy loose bounds. Second, the benefits of randomization on the stability of the network are identified. Third, exact results, for certain restricted models for sources and transmission, and approximate analytic results, for quite general models, are derived for the mean delays. These results show that, in the stable regime, the maximum mean time from source to destination is asymptotically proportional to log N . Numerical results are presented.
Debasis Mitra 0001, Randall A. Cieslak
J. ACM2
1986 Randomized Parallel Communications
Debasis Mitra 0001, Randall A. Cieslak
ICPP2