Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Wiehe

dblp:69/1937 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-8932-2772ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 10 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory element discovery
cis-regulatory module prediction
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.112006
Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome visualization
0.012003
gff2aplot: Plotting sequence comparisons · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence alignment
sequence alignment visualization
0.012003
gff2aplot: Plotting sequence comparisons · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics
0.012002
Calculating the SNP-effective sample size from an alignment · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
single nucleotide polymorphism analysis
0.012002
Calculating the SNP-effective sample size from an alignment · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence alignment
0.011999
Post-processing long pairwise alignments · Bioinform. 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.011999
Post-processing long pairwise alignments · Bioinform. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ungapped sequence alignment · 0.1compositional analysis of DNA · 0.1comparative genomic analysis · 0.1postscript rendering · 0.0logarithmic coverage model · 0.0BLAST alignment analysis · 0.0dynamic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Adaptation in structured populations and fuzzy boundaries between hard and soft sweeps
abstract
Selective sweeps, the genetic footprint of positive selection, have been extensively studied in the past decades, with dozens of methods developed to identify swept regions. However, these methods suffer from both false positive and false negative reports, and the candidates identified with different methods are often inconsistent with each other. We propose that a biological cause of this problem can be population subdivision, and a technical cause can be incomplete, or inaccurate, modeling of the dynamic process associated with sweeps. Here we used simulations to show how these effects interact and potentially cause bias. In particular, we show that sweeps maybe misclassified as either hard or soft, when the true time stage of a sweep and that implied, or pre-supposed, by the model do not match. We call this "temporal misclassification". Similarly, "spatial misclassification (softening)" can occur when hard sweeps, which are imported by migration into a new subpopulation, are falsely identified as soft. This can easily happen in case of local adaptation, i.e. when the sweeping allele is not under positive selection in the new subpopulation, and the underlying model assumes panmixis instead of substructure. The claim that most sweeps in the evolutionary history of humans were soft, may have to be reconsidered in the light of these findings.
Yichen Zheng, Thomas Wiehe
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2013 Coalescent Tree Imbalance and a Simple Test for Selective Sweeps Based on Microsatellite Variation
abstract
Selective sweeps are at the core of adaptive evolution. We study how the shape of coalescent trees is affected by recent selective sweeps. To do so we define a coarse-grained measure of tree topology. This measure has appealing analytical properties, its distribution is derived from a uniform, and it is easy to estimate from experimental data. We show how it can be cast into a test for recent selective sweeps using microsatellite markers and present an application to an experimental data set from Plasmodium falciparum.
Thomas Wiehe
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2009 Simulation of DNA sequence evolution under models of recent directional selection
abstract
Computer simulation is an essential tool in the analysis of DNA sequence variation for mapping events of recent adaptive evolution in the genome. Various simulation methods are employed to predict the signature of selection in sequence variation. The most informative and efficient method currently in use is coalescent simulation. However, this method is limited to simple models of directional selection. Whole-population forward-in-time simulations are the alternative to coalescent simulations for more complex models. The notorious problem of excessive computational cost in forward-in-time simulations can be overcome by various simplifying amendments. Overall, the success of simulations depends on the creative application of some population genetic theory to the simulation algorithm.
Yuseob Kim, Thomas Wiehe
Briefings Bioinform.2
2006 Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA
abstract
MOTIVATION: Predicting cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) in higher eukaryotes is a challenging computational task. Commonly used methods to predict CRMs based on the signal of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) are limited by prior information about transcription factor specificity. More general methods that bypass the reliance on TFBS models are needed for comprehensive CRM prediction. RESULTS: We have developed a method to predict CRMs called CisPlusFinder that identifies high density regions of perfect local ungapped sequences (PLUSs) based on multiple species conservation. By assuming that PLUSs contain core TFBS motifs that are locally overrepresented, the method attempts to capture the expected features of CRM structure and evolution. Applied to a benchmark dataset of CRMs involved in early Drosophila development, CisPlusFinder predicts more annotated CRMs than all other methods tested. Using the REDfly database, we find that some 'false positive' predictions in the benchmark dataset correspond to recently annotated CRMs. Our work demonstrates that CRM prediction methods that combine comparative genomic data with statistical properties of DNA may achieve reasonable performance when applied genome-wide in the absence of an a priori set of known TFBS motifs. AVAILABILITY: The program CisPlusFinder can be downloaded at http://jakob.genetik.uni-koeln.de/bioinformatik/people/nora/nora.html. All software is licensed under the Lesser GNU Public License (LGPL).
Nora Pierstorff, Casey M. Bergman, Thomas Wiehe
Bioinform.3
2006 How repetitive are genomes?
abstract
BACKGROUND: Genome sequences vary strongly in their repetitiveness and the causes for this are still debated. Here we propose a novel measure of genome repetitiveness, the index of repetitiveness, Ir, which can be computed in time proportional to the length of the sequences analyzed. We apply it to 336 genomes from all three domains of life. RESULTS: The expected value of Ir is zero for random sequences of any G/C content and greater than zero for sequences with excess repeats. We find that the Ir of archaea is significantly smaller than that of eubacteria, which in turn is smaller than that of eukaryotes. Mouse chromosomes have a significantly higher Ir than human chromosomes and within each genome the Y chromosome is most repetitive. A sliding window analysis reveals that the human HOXA cluster and two surrounding genes are characterized by local minima in Ir. A program for calculating the Ir is freely available at http://adenine.biz.fh-weihenstephan.de/ir/. CONCLUSION: The general measure of DNA repetitiveness proposed in this paper can be efficiently computed on a genomic scale. This reveals a broad spectrum of repetitiveness among diverse genomes which agrees qualitatively with previous studies of repeat content. A sliding window analysis helps to analyze the intragenomic distribution of repeats.
Bernhard Haubold, Thomas Wiehe
BMC Bioinform.2
2005 Genome comparison without alignment using shortest unique substrings
abstract
BACKGROUND: Sequence comparison by alignment is a fundamental tool of molecular biology. In this paper we show how a number of sequence comparison tasks, including the detection of unique genomic regions, can be accomplished efficiently without an alignment step. Our procedure for nucleotide sequence comparison is based on shortest unique substrings. These are substrings which occur only once within the sequence or set of sequences analysed and which cannot be further reduced in length without losing the property of uniqueness. Such substrings can be detected using generalized suffix trees. RESULTS: We find that the shortest unique substrings in Caenorhabditis elegans, human and mouse are no longer than 11 bp in the autosomes of these organisms. In mouse and human these unique substrings are significantly clustered in upstream regions of known genes. Moreover, the probability of finding such short unique substrings in the genomes of human or mouse by chance is extremely small. We derive an analytical expression for the null distribution of shortest unique substrings, given the GC-content of the query sequences. Furthermore, we apply our method to rapidly detect unique genomic regions in the genome of Staphylococcus aureus strain MSSA476 compared to four other staphylococcal genomes. CONCLUSION: We combine a method to rapidly search for shortest unique substrings in DNA sequences and a derivation of their null distribution. We show that unique regions in an arbitrary sample of genomes can be efficiently detected with this method. The corresponding programs shustring (SHortest Unique subSTRING) and shulen are written in C and available at http://adenine.biz.fh-weihenstephan.de/shustring/.
Bernhard Haubold, Nora Pierstorff, Friedrich Möller, Thomas Wiehe
BMC Bioinform.4
2003 gff2aplot: Plotting sequence comparisons
abstract
SUMMARY: gff2aplot is a program to visualize the alignment of two sequences together with their annotations. Input for the program consists of single or multiple files in GFF-format which specify the alignment coordinates and annotation features of both sequences. Output is in PostScript format of any size. The features to be displayed are highly customizable to meet user specific needs. The program serves to generate print-quality images for comparative genome sequence analysis. AVAILABILITY: gff2aplot is freely available under the GNU software licence and can be downloaded from the address specified below. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://genome.imim.es/software/gfftools/GFF2APLOT.html
Josep F. Abril, Roderic Guigó, Thomas Wiehe
Bioinform.3
2002 Calculating the SNP-effective sample size from an alignment
abstract
Abstract Motivation: The number of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) detectable in an alignment is a function of the length and the number of the aligned sequences. The latter is called sample size. However, a typical alignment, for instance obtained as a BLAST-search result of a query sequence against an EST database, does not evenly cover the query sequence. Therefore, it is usually not clear what the actual sample size is. Results: We present a method to calculate the effective sample size, called neff, for a given BLAST alignment. This method takes into account that multiple coverage contributes only logarithmically to the SNP yield of a given sequence stretch. We show that the effective sample size neff is usually much smaller than would be expected for a given amount of coverage and illustrate this with two typical examples. Availability: The algorithm is implemented in NEFF, a program written in FORTRAN90 that is accessible at http://soft.ice.mpg.de/neff. From this site also the source, except for two subroutines protected by copyright, and a LINUX compiled executable can be downloaded. Contact: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 2 Present address: LION Bioscience AG, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernhard Haubold, Thomas Wiehe
Bioinform.2
2000 Genome Sequence Comparisons: Hurdles in the Fast Lane to Functional Genomics
abstract
An important computational technique for extracting the wealth of information hidden in human genomic sequence data is to compare the sequence with that from the corresponding region of the mouse genome, looking for segments that are conserved over evolutionary time. Moreover, the approach generalises to comparison of sequences from any two related species. The underlying rationale (which is abundantly confirmed by observation) is that a random mutation in a functional region is usually deleterious to the organism, and hence unlikely to become fixed in the population, whereas mutations in a non-functional region are free to accumulate over time. The potential value of this approach is so attractive that the public and private projects to sequence the human genome are now turning to sequencing the mouse, and you will soon be able to compare the human and mouse sequences of your favourite genomic region. We are currently witnessing an explosion of computer tools for comparative analysis of two genomic sequences. Here the capabilities of two new network servers for comparing genomic sequences from any pair of closely related species are sketched. The Syntenic Gene Prediction Program SGP-I utilises sequence comparisons to enhance the ability to locate protein coding segments in genomic data. PipMaker attempts to determine all conserved genomic regions, regardless of their function.
Thomas Wiehe, Roderic Guigó, Webb Miller
Briefings Bioinform.1
1999 Post-processing long pairwise alignments
abstract
MOTIVATION: The local alignment problem for two sequences requires determining similar regions, one from each sequence, and aligning those regions. For alignments computed by dynamic programming, current approaches for selecting similar regions may have potential flaws. For instance, the criterion of Smith and Waterman can lead to inclusion of an arbitrarily poor internal segment. Other approaches can generate an alignment scoring less than some of its internal segments. RESULTS: We develop an algorithm that decomposes a long alignment into sub-alignments that avoid these potential imperfections. Our algorithm runs in time proportional to the original alignment's length. Practical applications to alignments of genomic DNA sequences are described.
Zheng Zhang 0004, Piotr Berman, Thomas Wiehe, Webb Miller
Bioinform.3