Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Berteun Damman

dblp:69/2799 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 67% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
counterexample generation
0.112009
Counterexample Generation in Probabilistic Model Checking · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
probabilistic model checking
0.112009
Counterexample Generation in Probabilistic Model Checking · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009
Graph algorithms and graph theory
shortest path
0.112009
Counterexample Generation in Probabilistic Model Checking · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regular expression generation · 0.1probabilistic CTL · 0.1markov chain · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Counterexample Generation in Probabilistic Model Checking
abstract
Providing evidence for the refutation of a property is an essential, if not the most important, feature of model checking. This paper considers algorithms for counterexample generation for probabilistic CTL formulae in discrete-time Markov chains. Finding the strongest evidence (i.e., the most probable path) violating a (bounded) until-formula is shown to be reducible to a single-source (hop-constrained) shortest path problem. Counterexamples of smallest size that deviate most from the required probability bound can be obtained by applying (small amendments to) k-shortest (hop-constrained) paths algorithms. These results can be extended to Markov chains with rewards, to LTL model checking, and are useful for Markov decision processes. Experimental results show that typically the size of a counterexample is excessive. To obtain much more compact representations, we present a simple algorithm to generate (minimal) regular expressions that can act as counterexamples. The feasibility of our approach is illustrated by means of two communication protocols: leader election in an anonymous ring network and the Crowds protocol.
Tingting Han 0001, Joost-Pieter Katoen, Berteun Damman
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3