Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sandeep Mehta

dblp:69/3081 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 62% Motion planning and robot control · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
reactive planning
0.011991
Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › behavior-based control
reactive behavior
0.011991
Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system · ICRA 1991
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011991
Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system · ICRA 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reactive system adaptation · 0.0formal modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Achieving robustness by casting planning as adaptation of a reactive system
abstract
Classical artificial intelligence planning is not sufficiently robust in uncertain and dynamic environments. Reactive approaches are robust in some environments-namely those for which they have been programmed. An approach that integrates a priori planning with reaction to increase robustness is presented. As motivation, a practical robot problem, the kitting robot, is presented. Solving this problem demands a system that can make timely and robust actions in an uncertain environment. A solution to the kitting robot problem in which planning is cast as adaptation of a reactive system to suit changes in the goals or environment is outlined. The reactive system (the reactor) is based on a formal model for representing flexible robot plans, the RS model. Thus, it was possible to formalize the mechanisms by which the planner improves the behavior of the reactor. This system was implemented to control a Puma-560 robot equipped with visual sensing.>
Damian M. Lyons, Antonius J. Hendriks, Sandeep Mehta
ICRA3
1990 Representation and Execution Support for Reliable Robot Applications
abstract
Robot applications, represented as plans, are used to outline a viewpoint that robustness needs to be emphasized in two areas: in the plan representation and in the underlying system software. Robot applications are inherently distributed, since the hardware usually comprises a set of independent actuators and sensors, with the robot programs acting as links between them. A special model of distributed computation, the RS (Robot Schemas) model, has been designed to handle the issues of robot plan representation, and an overview of the model is presented. An initial implementation of the model with minimal execution support demonstrated that the domain-dependent aspect of robustness on its own was not sufficient for robust behavior. Consequently, the OS has been augmented with real-time scheduling, and monitoring facilities.>
Prabha Gopinath, Damian M. Lyons, Sandeep Mehta
SRDS3