Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maria P. Grineva
dblp:69/3201
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Data mining · 34% Information retrieval · 24% Data stream processing · 12% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Analysis of community structure in Wikipedia · WWW 2009 Extracting key terms from noisy and multitheme documents · WWW 2009 |
Data mining › clustering › document clustering
schema-based clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sedna: native XML database management system (internals overview) · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Data models and query languages › XML data management
XML database |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sedna: native XML database management system (internals overview) · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Indexing and storage engines
XML storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sedna: native XML database management system (internals overview) · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Memory systems
memory management |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Sedna: native XML database management system (internals overview) · SIGMOD Conference 2010 |
Web and social media mining
event detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Sifting micro-blogging stream for events of user interest · SIGIR 2009 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Extracting key terms from noisy and multitheme documents · WWW 2009 |
Information retrieval › text analysis
keyword extraction |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Extracting key terms from noisy and multitheme documents · WWW 2009 |
Data stream processing › continuous query processing
stream filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Sifting micro-blogging stream for events of user interest · SIGIR 2009 |
Data stream processing
streaming analytics |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Analytics for the Real-Time Web · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Web and social media mining › social media analysis
microblog analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Sifting micro-blogging stream for events of user interest · SIGIR 2009 |
Information retrieval › ranking › graph-based ranking
pagerank |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Analysis of community structure in Wikipedia · WWW 2009 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Analysis of community structure in Wikipedia · WWW 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
schema-based clustering · 0.2wikipedia-based semantic relatedness · 0.1pagerank · 0.1graph community detection · 0.1frequency-based analysis · 0.1community detection · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Analytics for the Real-Time Web
Maxim N. Grinev, Maria P. Grineva, Martin Hentschel 0001, Donald Kossmann |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2010 | Sedna: native XML database management system (internals overview)abstractWe present a native XML database management system, Sedna, which is implemented from scratch as a full-featured database management system for storing large amounts of XML data. We believe that the key contribution of this system is an improved schema-based clustering storage strategy efficient for both XML querying and updating, and powered by a novel memory management technique. We position our approach with respect to state-of-the-art methods. Ilya Taranov, Ivan Shcheklein, Alexander Kalinin 0001, Leonid Novak, Sergei D. Kuznetsov, Roman Pastukhov, Alexander Boldakov, Denis Turdakov, Konstantin Antipin, Andrey Fomichev, Peter Pleshachkov, Pavel E. Velikhov, Nikolai Zavaritski, Maxim N. Grinev, Maria P. Grineva, Dmitry Lizorkin |
SIGMOD Conference | 15 |
| 2009 | Sifting micro-blogging stream for events of user interestabstractMicro-blogging is a new form of social communication that encourages users to share information about anything they are seeing or doing, the motivation facilitated by the ability to post brief text messages through a variety of devices. Twitter, the most popular micro-blogging tool, is exhibiting rapid growth [3]: up to 11% of online Americans are using Twitter by December 2008, compared to 6% in May 2008. Due to its nature, micro-blogosphere has unique features: (i) It is a source of extremely up-to-date information about what is happening in the world; (ii) It captures the wisdom of millions of people and covers a broad range of domains. These features make micro-blogosphere more than a popular medium of social communication: we believe that it has additionally become a valuable source of extremely up-to-date news on virtually any subject of user interest. Making use of micro-blogosphere in this new role we meet the following challenges: (A) Since any given subject is generally mentioned in the micro-blogging stream on the continuous basis, a method is needed for locating periods of news on this subject. (B) Additionally, even for such periods, stream filtering is required for removing noise and for extracting messages that best describe the news. To address these challenges we make and exploit the following observations: (A) For an arbitrary subject, events that catch user interest gain distinguishably more attention than the average mentioning of the subject resulting in message activity bursts for it. (B) Most of the messages in an activity burst describe common event in close variations - either rephrased or "retweeted" between the users. We demonstrate TweetSieve - a system that allows obtaining news on any given subject by sifting the Twitter stream. Our work is related to frequecy-based analysis applied to blogs [1], but higher latency and lower coverage in blogs makes the analysis less effective than in case of micro-blogs. In TweetSieve demo, the user is able to express the subject of her interest by an arbitrary search string. The system shows the period of events occuring for the subject and outputs tweets that best describe each of the events. Figure 1 shows a screenshot of the system for "Semantic search" as a sample subject. The underlying process consists of two steps: Identifying activity bursts. Counting the messages matching the search string in the stream over time, the frequency curve is constructed. Activity bursts in the curve are identified by taking the periods of frequency exceeding the standard deviation from the average. Selecting messages that best describe news events. For the set of all messages matching the search string in an activity burst, we apply the message-granular variation of our keyphrase extraction algorithm [2] that is specifically suited to efficiently filtering noisy data. The algorithm clusters messages with respect to their similarity to each other and chooses central messages from the most dense clusters. As the similarity measure we use Jaccard coefficient for the "bag of words" representation of messages. The demonstration illustrates the potential of our approach in bringing news acquisition to a new level of promptness and coverage range. Maxim N. Grinev, Maria P. Grineva, Alexander Boldakov, Leonid Novak, Andrey Syssoev, Dmitry Lizorkin |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2009 | Extracting key terms from noisy and multitheme documentsabstractWe present a novel method for key term extraction from text documents. In our method, document is modeled as a graph of semantic relationships between terms of that document. We exploit the following remarkable feature of the graph: the terms related to the main topics of the document tend to bunch up into densely interconnected subgraphs or communities, while non-important terms fall into weakly interconnected communities, or even become isolated vertices. We apply graph community detection techniques to partition the graph into thematically cohesive groups of terms. We introduce a criterion function to select groups that contain key terms discarding groups with unimportant terms. To weight terms and determine semantic relatedness between them we exploit information extracted from Wikipedia. Maria P. Grineva, Maxim N. Grinev, Dmitry Lizorkin |
WWW | 1 |
| 2009 | Analysis of community structure in WikipediaabstractWe present the results of a community detection analysis of the Wikipedia graph. Distinct communities in Wikipedia contain semantically closely related articles. The central topic of a community can be identified using PageRank. Extracted communities can be organized hierarchically similar to manually created Wikipedia category structure. Dmitry Lizorkin, Olena Medelyan, Maria P. Grineva |
WWW | 3 |