Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Patarin
dblp:69/352
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Network measurement and analytics · 40% Internet architecture and protocols · 28% Content delivery and video streaming · 28% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Content delivery and video streaming › peer-to-peer file sharing
file sharing |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Peer sharing behaviour in the eDonkey network, and implications for the design of server-less file sharing systems · EuroSys 2006 |
Internet architecture and protocols
peer-to-peer networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Peer sharing behaviour in the eDonkey network, and implications for the design of server-less file sharing systems · EuroSys 2006 |
Network measurement and analytics
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Peer sharing behaviour in the eDonkey network, and implications for the design of server-less file sharing systems · EuroSys 2006 |
Network management and operations
network monitoring |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Pandora: A Flexible Network Monitoring Platform · USENIX ATC, General Track 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trace-driven simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Peer sharing behaviour in the eDonkey network, and implications for the design of server-less file sharing systemsabstractIn this paper we present an empirical study of a workload gathered by crawling the eDonkey network --- a dominant peer-to-peer file sharing system --- for over 50 days.We first confirm the presence of some known features, in particular the prevalence of free-riding and the Zipf-like distribution of file popularity. We also analyze the evolution of document popularity.We then provide an in-depth analysis of several clustering properties of such workloads. We measure the geographical clustering of peers offering a given file. We find that most files are offered mostly by peers of a single country, although popular files don't have such a clear home country.We then analyze the overlap between contents offered by different peers. We find that peer contents are highly clustered according to several metrics of interest.We propose to leverage this property by allowing peers to search for content without server support, by querying suitably identified semantic neighbours. We find via trace-driven simulations that this approach is generally effective, and is even more effective for rare files. If we further allow peers to query both their semantic neighbours, and in turn their neighbours' neighbours, we attain hit rates as high as over 55% for neighbour lists of size 20. Sidath B. Handurukande, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, Fabrice Le Fessant, Laurent Massoulié, Simon Patarin |
EuroSys | 5 |
| 2006 | A Semantic Overlay Network for P2P Schema-Based Data IntegrationabstractToday data sources are pervasive and their number is growing tremendously. Current tools are not prepared to exploit this unprecedented amount of information and to cope with this highly heterogeneous, autonomous and dynamic environment. In this paper, we propose a novel semantic overlay network architecture, PARIS, aimed at addressing these issues. In PARIS, the combination of decentralized semantic data integration with gossip-based (unstructured) overlay topology management and (structured) distributed hash tables provides the required level of flexibility, adaptability and scalability, and still allows to perform rich queries on a number of autonomous data sources. We describe the logical model that supports the architecture and show how its original topology is constructed. We present the usage of the system in detail, in particular, the algorithms used to let new peers join the network and to execute queries on top of it and show simulation results that assess the scalability and robustness of the architecture. Carmela Comito, Simon Patarin, Domenico Talia |
ISCC | 2 |
| 2005 | A Generic Language for Dynamic Adaptation
Assia Hachichi, Gaël Thomas 0001, Cyril Martin, Bertil Folliot, Simon Patarin |
Euro-Par | 5 |
| 2000 | Pandora: A Flexible Network Monitoring Platform
Simon Patarin, Mesaac Makpangou |
USENIX ATC, General Track | 1 |