EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ron Bekkerman
dblp:69/3820
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
14as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-5636-694XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 11 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 10 · 7 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
11 papers |
Data mining · 49% Information retrieval · 20% Data integration and cleaning · 18% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational finance and economics · 62% Computational social science and digital humanities · 38% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 33, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational finance and economics
platform economics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Effect of Short-Term Rentals on Residential Investment · EC 2022 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.4 | 6 | 2009 | Improving clustering stability with combinatorial MRFs · KDD 2009 One-Class Clustering in the Text Domain · EMNLP 2008 Web Page Clustering Using Heuristic Search in the Web Graph · IJCAI 2007 |
Data mining › text mining
text classification |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | High-precision phrase-based document classification on a modern scale · KDD 2011 On Feature Distributional Clustering for Text Categorization · SIGIR 2001 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning to rank social update streams · SIGIR 2012 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning to rank social update streams · SIGIR 2012 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Bimodal invitation-navigation fair bets model for authority identification in a social network · WWW 2012 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning to rank social update streams · SIGIR 2012 |
Data mining › clustering
document clustering |
0.1 | 2 | 2008 | One-Class Clustering in the Text Domain · EMNLP 2008 Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions · ICML 2005 |
Data mining › clustering › clustering evaluation
clustering stability |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Improving clustering stability with combinatorial MRFs · KDD 2009 |
Data mining › clustering
ensemble clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Improving clustering stability with combinatorial MRFs · KDD 2009 |
Data mining › clustering
one-class clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | One-Class Clustering in the Text Domain · EMNLP 2008 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
multi-modal clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Multi-modal Clustering for Multimedia Collections · CVPR 2007 |
Data mining › clustering
interactive clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Interactive Clustering of Text Collections According to a User-Specified Criterion · IJCAI 2007 |
Data mining › clustering › document clustering
web page clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Web Page Clustering Using Heuristic Search in the Web Graph · IJCAI 2007 |
Data mining › clustering › probabilistic clustering
distribution clustering |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions · ICML 2005 On Feature Distributional Clustering for Text Categorization · SIGIR 2001 |
Data integration and cleaning
entity disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Disambiguating Web appearances of people in a social network · WWW 2005 |
Information retrieval › text analysis
name disambiguation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Disambiguating Web appearances of people in a social network · WWW 2005 |
Web and social media mining
social context |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Disambiguating Web appearances of people in a social network · WWW 2005 |
Data mining › clustering › multi-view clustering
tensor-based clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions · ICML 2005 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Bimodal invitation-navigation fair bets model for authority identification in a social network · WWW 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Distributional Word Clusters vs. Words for Text Categorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
word clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Distributional Word Clusters vs. Words for Text Categorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 |
Data mining › text mining
phrase mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | High-precision phrase-based document classification on a modern scale · KDD 2011 |
Information retrieval
text analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | High-precision phrase-based document classification on a modern scale · KDD 2011 |
Information theory › information measures
mutual information |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactions · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Distributional Word Clusters vs. Words for Text Categorization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
econometrics · 0.9regression discontinuity · 0.6difference-in-differences · 0.6pagerank · 0.3graph ranking · 0.3combinatorial markov random field · 0.2information bottleneck · 0.2probabilistic latent factor model · 0.1k-means · 0.1clickthrough modeling · 0.1lazy learning · 0.1optimization · 0.1inference · 0.1heuristic search · 0.1top-down clustering · 0.1local optimization · 0.1bottom-up clustering · 0.1distributional word clusters · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | The Effect of Short-Term Rentals on Residential InvestmentabstractWe provide new evidence that short-term rental (STR) platforms like Airbnb incentivize residential real estate investment. We exploit two complementary identification strategies. First, we use variation in the timing of STR regulations to estimate the effect of regulation on both Airbnb listings and residential permits. We find that over the first 12 months following the start of the regulation, STR regulations reduce Airbnb listings by 8.9% and residential permits by 10.8%. Second, we show that residential permits decline discontinuously across jurisdictional boundaries in which one side of the boundary has a STR regulation and the other side does not. The effect is especially striking for accessory dwelling units, which decline by 16.5% across regulatory boundaries. Our results imply that STRs incentivize residential investment, and especially so for housing units that are well suited for short-term renting. Ron Bekkerman, Maxime C. Cohen, Edward Kung, John Maiden, Davide Proserpio |
EC | 1 |
| 2020 | Data Science for the Real Estate IndustryabstractWorld's major industries, such as Financial Services, Telecom, Advertising, Healthcare, Education, etc, have attracted the attention of the KDD community for decades. Hundreds of KDD papers have been published on topics related to these industries and dozens of workshops organized---some of which have become an integral part of the conference agenda (e.g. the Health Day). Somewhat unexpectedly, the KDD conference has barely addressed the real estate industry, despite its enormous size and prominence. The reason for that apparent mismatch is two-fold: (a) until recently, the real estate industry did not appreciate the value data science methods could add (with some exceptions, such as econometrics methods for creating real-estate price indices); (b) the Data Science community has not been aware of challenging real estate problems that are perfectly suited to its methods. This tutorial provides a step towards resolving this issue. We provide an introduction to real estate for data scientists, and outline a spectrum of data science problems, many of which are being tackled by new "prop-tech" companies, while some are yet to be approached. We present concrete examples from three of these companies (where the authors work): Airbnb -- the most popular short-term rental marketplace, Cherre -- a real estate data integration platform, and Compass -- the largest independent real estate brokerage in the U.S. Ron Bekkerman, Vanja Josifovski, Foster J. Provost |
KDD | 1 |
| 2020 | Identification of topical subpopulations on social media
Ido Dangur, Ron Bekkerman, Einat Minkov |
Inf. Sci. | 2 |
| 2012 | Learning to rank social update streamsabstractAs online social media further integrates deeper into our lives, we spend more time consuming social update streams that come from our online connections. Although social update streams provide a tremendous opportunity for us to access information on-the-fly, we often complain about its relevance. Some of us are flooded with a steady stream of information and simply cannot process it in full. Ranking the incoming content becomes the only solution for the overwhelmed users. For some others, in contrast, the incoming information stream is pretty weak, and they have to actively search for relevant information which is quite tedious. For these users, augmenting their incoming content flow with relevant information from outside their first-degree network would be a viable solution. In that case, the problem of relevance becomes even more prominent. In this paper, we start an open discussion on how to build effective systems for ranking social updates from a unique perspective of LinkedIn -- the largest professional network in the world. More specifically, we address this problem as an intersection of learning to rank, collaborative filtering, and clickthrough modeling, while leveraging ideas from information retrieval and recommender systems. We propose a novel probabilistic latent factor model with regressions on explicit features and compare it with a number of non-trivial baselines. In addition to demonstrating superior performance of our model, we shed some light on the nature of social updates on LinkedIn and how users interact with them, which might be applicable to social update streams in general. Liangjie Hong, Ron Bekkerman, Joseph Adler, Brian D. Davison 0001 |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2012 | Bimodal invitation-navigation fair bets model for authority identification in a social networkabstractWe consider the problem of identifying the most respected, authoritative members of a large-scale online social network (OSN) by constructing a global ranked list of its members. The problem is distinct from the problem of identifying influencers: we are interested in identifying members who are influential in the real world, even when not necessarily so on the OSN. We focus on two sources for information about user authority: (a) invitations to connect, which are usually sent to people whom the inviter respects, and (b) members' browsing behavior, as profiles of more important people are viewed more often than others'. We construct two directed graphs over the same set of nodes (representing member profiles): the invitation graph and the navigation graph respectively. We show that the standard PageRank algorithm, a baseline in web page ranking, is not effective in people ranking, and develop a social capital based model, called the fair bets model, as a viable solution. We then propose a novel approach, called bimodal fair bets, for combining information from two (or more) endorsement graphs drawn from the same OSN, by simultaneously using the authority scores of nodes in one graph to inform the other, and vice versa, in a mutually reinforcing fashion. We evaluate the ranking results on the LinkedIn social network using this model, where members who have Wikipedia profiles are assumed to be authoritative. Experimental results show that our approach outperforms the baseline approach by a large margin. Suratna Budalakoti, Ron Bekkerman |
WWW | 2 |
| 2011 | High-precision phrase-based document classification on a modern scaleabstractWe present a document classification system that employs lazy learning from labeled phrases, and argue that the system can be highly effective whenever the following property holds: most of information on document labels is captured in phrases. We call this property near sufficiency. Our research contribution is twofold: (a) we quantify the near sufficiency property using the Information Bottleneck principle and show that it is easy to check on a given dataset; (b) we reveal that in all practical cases---from small-scale to very large-scale---manual labeling of phrases is feasible: the natural language constrains the number of common phrases composed of a vocabulary to grow linearly with the size of the vocabulary. Both these contributions provide firm foundation to applicability of the phrase-based classification (PBC) framework to a variety of large-scale tasks. We deployed the PBC system on the task of job title classification, as a part of LinkedIn's data standardization effort. The system significantly outperforms its predecessor both in terms of precision and coverage. It is currently being used in LinkedIn's ad targeting product, and more applications are being developed. We argue that PBC excels in high explainability of the classification results, as well as in low development and low maintenance costs. We benchmark PBC against existing high-precision document classification algorithms and conclude that it is most useful in multilabel classification. Ron Bekkerman, Matan Gavish |
KDD | 1 |
| 2009 | Improving clustering stability with combinatorial MRFsabstractAs clustering methods are often sensitive to parameter tuning, obtaining stability in clustering results is an important task. In this work, we aim at improving clustering stability by attempting to diminish the influence of algorithmic inconsistencies and enhance the signal that comes from the data. We propose a mechanism that takes m clusterings as input and outputs m clusterings of comparable quality, which are in higher agreement with each other. We call our method the Clustering Agreement Process (CAP). To preserve the clustering quality, CAP uses the same optimization procedure as used in clustering. In particular, we study the stability problem of randomized clustering methods (which usually produce different results at each run). We focus on methods that are based on inference in a combinatorial Markov Random Field (or Comraf, for short) of a simple topology. We instantiate CAP as inference within a more complex, bipartite Comraf. We test the resulting system on four datasets, three of which are medium-sized text collections, while the fourth is a large-scale user/movie dataset. First, in all the four cases, our system significantly improves the clustering stability measured in terms of the macro-averaged Jaccard index. Second, in all the four cases our system managed to significantly improve clustering quality as well, achieving the state-of-the-art results. Third, our system significantly improves stability of consensus clustering built on top of the randomized clustering solutions. Ron Bekkerman, Martin Scholz, Krishnamurthy Viswanathan |
KDD | 1 |
| 2008 | Data weaving: scaling up the state-of-the-art in data clusteringabstractThe enormous amount and dimensionality of data processed by modern data mining tools require effective, scalable unsupervised learning techniques. Unfortunately, the majority of previously proposed clustering algorithms are either effective or scalable. This paper is concerned with information-theoretic clustering (ITC) that has historically been considered the state-of-the-art in clustering multi-dimensional data. Most existing ITC methods are computationally expensive and not easily scalable. Those few ITC methods that scale well (using, e.g., parallelization) are often outperformed by the others, of an inherently sequential nature. First, we justify this observation theoretically. We then propose data weaving - a novel method for parallelizing sequential clustering algorithms. Data weaving is intrinsically multi-modal - it allows simultaneous clustering of a few types of data (modalities). Finally, we use data weaving to parallelize multi-modal ITC, which results in proposing a powerful DataLoom algorithm. In our experimentation with small datasets, DataLoom shows practically identical performance compared to expensive sequential alternatives. On large datasets, however, DataLoom demonstrates significant gains over other parallel clustering methods. To illustrate the scalability, we simultaneously clustered rows and columns of a contingency table with over 120 billion entries. Ron Bekkerman, Martin Scholz |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2008 | One-Class Clustering in the Text Domain
Ron Bekkerman, Koby Crammer |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2007 | Multi-modal Clustering for Multimedia CollectionsabstractMost of the online multimedia collections, such as picture galleries or video archives, are categorized in a fully manual process, which is very expensive and may soon be infeasible with the rapid growth of multimedia repositories. In this paper, we present an effective method for automating this process within the unsupervised learning framework. We exploit the truly multi-modal nature of multimedia collections - they have multiple views, or modalities, each of which contributes its own perspective to the collection's organization. For example, in picture galleries, image captions are often provided that form a separate view on the collection. Color histograms (or any other set of global features) form another view. Additional views are blobs, interest points and other sets of local features. Our model, called Comraf* (pronounced Comraf-Star), efficiently incorporates various views in multi-modal clustering, by which it allows great modeling flexibility. Comraf* is a light-weight version of the recently introduced combinatorial Markov random field (Comraf). We show how to translate an arbitrary Comraf into a series of Comraf* models, and give an empirical evidence for comparable effectiveness of the two. Comraf* demonstrates excellent results on two real-world image galleries: it obtains 2.5-3 times higher accuracy compared with a uni-modal k-means. Ron Bekkerman, Jiwoon Jeon |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2007 | Interactive Clustering of Text Collections According to a User-Specified Criterion
Ron Bekkerman, Hema Raghavan, James Allan 0001, Koji Eguchi |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2007 | Web Page Clustering Using Heuristic Search in the Web Graph
Ron Bekkerman, Shlomo Zilberstein, James Allan 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2006 | Combinatorial Markov Random Fields
Ron Bekkerman, Mehran Sahami, Erik G. Learned-Miller |
ECML | 1 |
| 2005 | Multi-way distributional clustering via pairwise interactionsabstractWe present a novel unsupervised learning scheme that simultaneously clusters variables of several types (e.g., documents, words and authors) based on pairwise interactions between the types, as observed in co-occurrence data. In this scheme, multiple clustering systems are generated aiming at maximizing an objective function that measures multiple pairwise mutual information between cluster variables. To implement this idea, we propose an algorithm that interleaves top-down clustering of some variables and bottom-up clustering of the other variables, with a local optimization correction routine. Focusing on document clustering we present an extensive empirical study of two-way, three-way and four-way applications of our scheme using six real-world datasets including the 20 News-groups (20NG) and the Enron email collection. Our multi-way distributional clustering (MDC) algorithms consistently and significantly outperform previous state-of-the-art information theoretic clustering algorithms. Ron Bekkerman, Ran El-Yaniv, Andrew McCallum |
ICML | 1 |
| 2005 | Disambiguating Web appearances of people in a social networkabstractSay you are looking for information about a particular person. A search engine returns many pages for that person's name but which pages are about the person you care about, and which are about other people who happen to have the same name? Furthermore, if we are looking for multiple people who are related in some way, how can we best leverage this social network? This paper presents two unsupervised frameworks for solving this problem: one based on link structure of the Web pages, another using Agglomerative/Conglomerative Double Clustering (A/CDC)---an application of a recently introduced multi-way distributional clustering method. To evaluate our methods, we collected and hand-labeled a dataset of over 1000 Web pages retrieved from Google queries on 12 personal names appearing together in someones in an email folder. On this dataset our methods outperform traditional agglomerative clustering by more than 20%, achieving over 80% F-measure. Ron Bekkerman, Andrew McCallum |
WWW | 1 |
| 2003 | Distributional Word Clusters vs. Words for Text Categorization
Ron Bekkerman, Ran El-Yaniv, Naftali Tishby, Yoad Winter |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2001 | On Feature Distributional Clustering for Text CategorizationabstractWe describe a text categorization approach that is based on a combination of feature distributional clusters with a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Our feature selection approach employs distributional clustering of words via the recently introducedinformation bottleneck method, which generates a more efficientword-clusterrepresentation of documents. Combined with the classification power of an SVM, this method yields high performance text categorization that can outperform other recent methods in terms of categorization accuracy and representation efficiency. Comparing the accuracy of our method with other techniques, we observe significant dependency of the results on the data set. We discuss the potential reasons for this dependency. Ron Bekkerman, Ran El-Yaniv, Yoad Winter, Naftali Tishby |
SIGIR | 1 |