Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iftach Nachman
dblp:69/411
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
0000-0002-4667-0398ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
bayesian network structure learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | "Ideal Parent" Structure Learning for Continuous Variable Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | "Ideal Parent" Structure Learning for Continuous Variable Bayesian Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2000 | Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data · RECOMB 2000 Tissue classification with gene expression profiles · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference › gene regulatory network inference
bayesian network inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Tissue classification with gene expression profiles · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › sample classification
tissue classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Tissue classification with gene expression profiles · RECOMB 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
classification · 0.0bayesian network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | BRNI: Modular analysis of transcriptional regulatory programsabstractBACKGROUND: Transcriptional responses often consist of regulatory modules - sets of genes with a shared expression pattern that are controlled by the same regulatory mechanisms. Previous methods allow dissecting regulatory modules from genomics data, such as expression profiles, protein-DNA binding, and promoter sequences. In cases where physical protein-DNA data are lacking, such methods are essential for the analysis of the underlying regulatory program. RESULTS: Here, we present a novel approach for the analysis of modular regulatory programs. Our method - Biochemical Regulatory Network Inference (BRNI) - is based on an algorithm that learns from expression data a biochemically-motivated regulatory program. It describes the expression profiles of gene modules consisting of hundreds of genes using a small number of regulators and affinity parameters. We developed an ensemble learning algorithm that ensures the robustness of the learned model. We then use the topology of the learned regulatory program to guide the discovery of a library of cis-regulatory motifs, and determined the motif compositions associated with each module.We test our method on the cell cycle regulatory program of the fission yeast. We discovered 16 coherent modules, covering diverse processes from cell division to metabolism and associated them with 18 learned regulatory elements, including both known cell-cycle regulatory elements (MCB, Ace2, PCB, ACCCT box) and novel ones, some of which are associated with G2 modules. We integrate the regulatory relations from the expression- and motif-based models into a single network, highlighting specific topologies that result in distinct dynamics of gene expression in the fission yeast cell cycle. CONCLUSION: Our approach provides a biologically-driven, principled way for deconstructing a set of genes into meaningful transcriptional modules and identifying their associated cis-regulatory programs. Our analysis sheds light on the architecture and function of the regulatory network controlling the fission yeast cell cycle, and a similar approach can be applied to the regulatory underpinnings of other modular transcriptional responses. Iftach Nachman, Aviv Regev |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | "Ideal Parent" Structure Learning for Continuous Variable Bayesian Networks
Gal Elidan, Iftach Nachman, Nir Friedman |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2004 | "Ideal Parent" Structure Learning for Continuous Variable Networks
Iftach Nachman, Gal Elidan, Nir Friedman |
UAI | 1 |
| 2000 | Tissue classification with gene expression profilesabstractConstantly improving gene expression profiling technologies are expected to provide understanding and insight into cancer related cellular processes. Gene expression data is also expected to significantly and in the development of efficient cancer diagnosis and classification platforms. In this work we examine two sets of gene expression data measured across sets of tumor and normal clinical samples One set consists of 2,000 genes, measured in 62 epithelial colon samples [1]. The second consists of ≈ 100,000 clones, measured in 32 ovarian samples (unpublished, extension of data set described in [26]). Amir Ben-Dor, Laurakay Bruhn, Nir Friedman, Iftach Nachman, Michèl Schummer, Zohar Yakhini |
RECOMB | 4 |
| 2000 | Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression dataabstractDNA hybridization arrays simultaneously measure the expression level for thousands of genes. These measurements provide a “snapshot” of transcription levels within the cell. A major challenge in computational biology is to uncover, from such measurements, gene/protein interactions and key biological features of cellular systems. Nir Friedman, Michal Linial, Iftach Nachman, Dana Pe'er |
RECOMB | 3 |
| 2000 | Gaussian Process Networks
Nir Friedman, Iftach Nachman |
UAI | 2 |
| 1999 | Learning Bayesian Network Structure from Massive Datasets: The "Sparse Candidate" Algorithm
Nir Friedman, Iftach Nachman, Dana Pe'er |
UAI | 2 |