Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ke Sun 0013
dblp:69/476-13
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
9as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 57% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Graph learning · 14% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
distributional reinforcement learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Intrinsic Benefits of Categorical Distributional Loss: Uncertainty-aware Regularized Exploration in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Regularized Wasserstein Loss · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | AdaGCN: Adaboosting Graph Convolutional Networks into Deep Models · ICLR 2021 Multi-Stage Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Convolutional Networks on Graphs with Few Labeled Nodes · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pareto adversarial robustness: balancing spatial robustness and sensitivity-based robustness · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regularization for reinforcement learning
entropy regularization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Intrinsic Benefits of Categorical Distributional Loss: Uncertainty-aware Regularized Exploration in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Intrinsic Benefits of Categorical Distributional Loss: Uncertainty-aware Regularized Exploration in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › input transformation robustness
spatial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pareto adversarial robustness: balancing spatial robustness and sensitivity-based robustness · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
uncertainty-guided exploration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Intrinsic Benefits of Categorical Distributional Loss: Uncertainty-aware Regularized Exploration in Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Regularized Wasserstein Loss · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy accounting
gaussian differential privacy |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy amplification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning › boosting
adaboost |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AdaGCN: Adaboosting Graph Convolutional Networks into Deep Models · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AdaGCN: Adaboosting Graph Convolutional Networks into Deep Models · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › graph convolutional network
deep graph convolutional network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | AdaGCN: Adaboosting Graph Convolutional Networks into Deep Models · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Damped Anderson Mixing for Deep Reinforcement Learning: Acceleration, Convergence, and Stabilization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › iterative methods
anderson mixing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Damped Anderson Mixing for Deep Reinforcement Learning: Acceleration, Convergence, and Stabilization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
fixed point computation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Damped Anderson Mixing for Deep Reinforcement Learning: Acceleration, Convergence, and Stabilization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy accounting
composition theorems |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › dynamic programming
policy iteration |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Damped Anderson Mixing for Deep Reinforcement Learning: Acceleration, Convergence, and Stabilization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-Stage Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Convolutional Networks on Graphs with Few Labeled Nodes · AAAI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quasi-newton method · 1.0mellowmax operator · 1.0policy optimization · 0.9pareto optimization · 0.9distribution-matching entropy regularization · 0.9adversarial attack · 0.9wasserstein loss · 0.8sinkhorn divergence · 0.8privacy profile analysis · 0.6post-processing · 0.6adaboost · 0.5deepcluster · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Concurrent Positive-Unlabeled Classification and Robust Generation
Ke Sun 0013, He Wang 0002, Zhouchen Lin, Zhanxing Zhu |
ICIG (2) | 2 |
| 2025 | Intrinsic Benefits of Categorical Distributional Loss: Uncertainty-aware Regularized Exploration in Reinforcement LearningabstractThe remarkable empirical performance of distributional reinforcement learning~(RL) has garnered increasing attention to understanding its theoretical advantages over classical RL. By decomposing the categorical distributional loss commonly employed in distributional RL, we find that the potential superiority of distributional RL can be attributed to a derived distribution-matching entropy regularization. This less-studied entropy regularization aims to capture additional knowledge of return distribution beyond only its expectation, contributing to an augmented reward signal in policy optimization. In contrast to the vanilla entropy regularization in MaxEnt RL, which explicitly encourages exploration by promoting diverse actions, the novel entropy regularization derived from categorical distributional loss implicitly updates policies to align the learned policy with (estimated) environmental uncertainty. Finally, extensive experiments verify the significance of this uncertainty-aware regularization from distributional RL on the empirical benefits over classical RL. Our study offers an innovative exploration perspective to explain the intrinsic benefits of distributional learning in RL. Ke Sun 0013, Enze Shi, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Pareto adversarial robustness: balancing spatial robustness and sensitivity-based robustness
Ke Sun 0013, Mingjie Li 0007, Zhouchen Lin |
Sci. China Inf. Sci. | 1 |
| 2024 | Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Regularized Wasserstein LossabstractThe empirical success of distributional reinforcement learning (RL) highly relies on the choice of distribution divergence equipped with an appropriate distribution representation. In this paper, we propose \textit{Sinkhorn distributional RL (SinkhornDRL)}, which leverages Sinkhorn divergence—a regularized Wasserstein loss—to minimize the difference between current and target Bellman return distributions. Theoretically, we prove the contraction properties of SinkhornDRL, aligning with the interpolation nature of Sinkhorn divergence between Wasserstein distance and Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD). The introduced SinkhornDRL enriches the family of distributional RL algorithms, contributing to interpreting the algorithm behaviors compared with existing approaches by our investigation into their relationships. Empirically, we show that SinkhornDRL consistently outperforms or matches existing algorithms on the Atari games suite and particularly stands out in the multi-dimensional reward setting. \thanks{Code is available in \url{https://github.com/datake/SinkhornDistRL}.}. Ke Sun 0013, Wulong Liu, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Patch-level Neighborhood Interpolation: A General and Effective Graph-based Regularization Strategy
Ke Sun 0013, Zhouchen Lin, Zhanxing Zhu |
ACML | 1 |
| 2023 | Exploring the Training Robustness of Distributional Reinforcement Learning Against Noisy State Observations
Ke Sun 0013, Shangling Jui, Linglong Kong |
ECML/PKDD (5) | 1 |
| 2022 | Identification, Amplification and Measurement: A bridge to Gaussian Differential PrivacyabstractGaussian differential privacy (GDP) is a single-parameter family of privacy notions that provides coherent guarantees to avoid the exposure of sensitive individual information. Despite the extra interpretability and tighter bounds under composition GDP provides, many widely used mechanisms (e.g., the Laplace mechanism) inherently provide GDP guarantees but often fail to take advantage of this new framework because their privacy guarantees were derived under a different background. In this paper, we study the asymptotic properties of privacy profiles and develop a simple criterion to identify algorithms with GDP properties. We propose an efficient method for GDP algorithms to narrow down possible values of an optimal privacy measurement, $\mu$ with an arbitrarily small and quantifiable margin of error. For non GDP algorithms, we provide a post-processing procedure that can amplify existing privacy guarantees to meet the GDP condition. As applications, we compare two single-parameter families of privacy notions, $\epsilon$-DP, and $\mu$-GDP, and show that all $\epsilon$-DP algorithms are intrinsically also GDP. Lastly, we show that the combination of our measurement process and the composition theorem of GDP is a powerful and convenient tool to handle compositions compared to the traditional standard and advanced composition theorems. Yi Liu 0062, Ke Sun 0013, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | AdaGCN: Adaboosting Graph Convolutional Networks into Deep Models
Ke Sun 0013, Zhanxing Zhu, Zhouchen Lin |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Damped Anderson Mixing for Deep Reinforcement Learning: Acceleration, Convergence, and StabilizationabstractAnderson mixing has been heuristically applied to reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for accelerating convergence and improving the sampling efficiency of deep RL. Despite its heuristic improvement of convergence, a rigorous mathematical justification for the benefits of Anderson mixing in RL has not yet been put forward. In this paper, we provide deeper insights into a class of acceleration schemes built on Anderson mixing that improve the convergence of deep RL algorithms. Our main results establish a connection between Anderson mixing and quasi-Newton methods and prove that Anderson mixing increases the convergence radius of policy iteration schemes by an extra contraction factor. The key focus of the analysis roots in the fixed-point iteration nature of RL. We further propose a stabilization strategy by introducing a stable regularization term in Anderson mixing and a differentiable, non-expansive MellowMax operator that can allow both faster convergence and more stable behavior. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our proposed method enhances the convergence, stability, and performance of RL algorithms. Ke Sun 0013, Yi Liu 0062, Shangling Jui, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Multi-Stage Self-Supervised Learning for Graph Convolutional Networks on Graphs with Few Labeled NodesabstractGraph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) play a crucial role in graph learning tasks, however, learning graph embedding with few supervised signals is still a difficult problem. In this paper, we propose a novel training algorithm for Graph Convolutional Network, called Multi-Stage Self-Supervised (M3S) Training Algorithm, combined with self-supervised learning approach, focusing on improving the generalization performance of GCNs on graphs with few labeled nodes. Firstly, a Multi-Stage Training Framework is provided as the basis of M3S training method. Then we leverage DeepCluster technique, a popular form of self-supervised learning, and design corresponding aligning mechanism on the embedding space to refine the Multi-Stage Training Framework, resulting in M3S Training Algorithm. Finally, extensive experimental results verify the superior performance of our algorithm on graphs with few labeled nodes under different label rates compared with other state-of-the-art approaches. Ke Sun 0013, Zhouchen Lin, Zhanxing Zhu |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Virtual Adversarial Training on Graph Convolutional Networks in Node Classification
Ke Sun 0013, Zhouchen Lin, Hantao Guo, Zhanxing Zhu |
PRCV (1) | 1 |