Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marin Saric

dblp:69/6152 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 67% Data mining · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › text analysis › stylometry
authorship attribution
0.012003
Style mining of electronic messages for multiple authorship discrimination: first results · KDD 2003
Information retrieval › text analysis
stylometry
0.012003
Style mining of electronic messages for multiple authorship discrimination: first results · KDD 2003
Data mining
text mining
0.012003
Style mining of electronic messages for multiple authorship discrimination: first results · KDD 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

winnow algorithm · 0.0multiclass classification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Style mining of electronic messages for multiple authorship discrimination: first results
abstract
This paper considers the use of computational stylistics for performing authorship attribution of electronic messages, addressing categorization problems with as many as 20 different classes (authors). Effective stylistic characterization of text is potentially useful for a variety of tasks, as language style contains cues regarding the authorship, purpose, and mood of the text, all of which would be useful adjuncts to information retrieval or knowledge-management tasks. We focus here on the problem of determining the author of an anonymous message, based only on the message text. Several multiclass variants of the Winnow algorithm were applied to a vector representation of the message texts to learn models for discriminating different authors. We present results comparing the classification accuracy of the different approaches. The results show that stylistic models can be accurately learned to determine an author's identity.
Shlomo Argamon, Marin Saric, Sterling Stuart Stein
KDD2