Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joanna Bresee

dblp:69/7188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 44% Authentication and access control · 44% Usable security · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
access control
0.112010
Access control for home data sharing: evaluating social acceptability · CHI 2010
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy notice
0.112010
Standardizing privacy notices: an online study of the nutrition label approach · CHI 2010
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › privacy
privacy policy comprehension
0.012010
Standardizing privacy notices: an online study of the nutrition label approach · CHI 2010
Usable security › security tool usability
access control usability
0.012010
Access control for home data sharing: evaluating social acceptability · CHI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online user study · 0.2semi-structured interviews · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Standardizing privacy notices: an online study of the nutrition label approach
abstract
Earlier work has shown that consumers cannot effectively find information in privacy policies and that they do not enjoy using them. In our previous research we developed a standardized table format for privacy policies. We compared this standardized format, and two short variants (one tabular, one text) with the current status quo: full text natural-language policies and layered policies. We conducted an online user study of 764 participants to test if these three more-intentionally designed, standardized privacy policy formats, assisted by consumer education, can benefit consumers. Our results show that standardized privacy policy presentations can have significant positive effects on accuracy and speed of information finding and on reader enjoyment of privacy policies.
Patrick Gage Kelley, Lucian Cesca, Joanna Bresee, Lorrie Faith Cranor
CHI3
2010 Access control for home data sharing: evaluating social acceptability
abstract
As digital content becomes more prevalent in the home, non-technical users are increasingly interested in sharing that content with others and accessing it from multiple devices. Not much is known about how these users think about controlling access to this data. To better understand this, we conducted semi-structured, in-situ interviews with 33 users in 15 households. We found that users create ad-hoc access-control mechanisms that do not always work; that their ideal policies are complex and multi-dimensional; that a priori policy specification is often insufficient; and that people's mental models of access control and security are often misaligned with current systems. We detail these findings and present a set of associated guidelines for designing usable access-control systems for the home environment.
Michelle L. Mazurek, J. P. Arsenault, Joanna Bresee, Nitin Gupta 0001, Iulia Ion, Christina Johns, Jenny Olsen, Brandon Salmon, Richard Shay, Kami Vaniea, Lujo Bauer, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Gregory R. Ganger, Michael K. Reiter
CHI3
2009 A "nutrition label" for privacy
abstract
We used an iterative design process to develop a privacy label that presents to consumers the ways organizations collect, use, and share personal information. Many surveys have shown that consumers are concerned about online privacy, yet current mechanisms to present website privacy policies have not been successful. This research addresses the present gap in the communication and understanding of privacy policies, by creating an information design that improves the visual presentation and comprehensibility of privacy policies. Drawing from nutrition, warning, and energy labeling, as well as from the effort towards creating a standardized banking privacy notification, we present our process for constructing and refining a label tuned to privacy. This paper describes our design methodology; findings from two focus groups; and accuracy, timing, and likeability results from a laboratory study with 24 participants. Our study results demonstrate that compared to existing natural language privacy policies, the proposed privacy label allows participants to find information more quickly and accurately, and provides a more enjoyable information seeking experience.
Patrick Gage Kelley, Joanna Bresee, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Robert W. Reeder
SOUPS2