Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hao Peng 0017
dblp:69/7742-17
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 19% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation regularization
embedding regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Comparative Study on Regularization Strategies for Embedding-based Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Comparative Study on Regularization Strategies for Embedding-based Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
relation classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Classifying Relations via Long Short Term Memory Networks along Shortest Dependency Paths · EMNLP 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
sentence embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Discriminative Neural Sentence Modeling by Tree-Based Convolution · EMNLP 2015 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
structural feature learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Discriminative Neural Sentence Modeling by Tree-Based Convolution · EMNLP 2015 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | A Comparative Study on Regularization Strategies for Embedding-based Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Discriminative Neural Sentence Modeling by Tree-Based Convolution · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Classifying Relations via Long Short Term Memory Networks along Shortest Dependency Paths · EMNLP 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dropout · 0.4weight penalization · 0.2tree-based convolution · 0.2shortest dependency path · 0.2reembedding · 0.2max pooling · 0.2long short-term memory network · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Discriminative Neural Sentence Modeling by Tree-Based ConvolutionabstractThis paper proposes a tree-based convolutional neural network (TBCNN) for discriminative sentence modeling.Our model leverages either constituency trees or dependency trees of sentences.The tree-based convolution process extracts sentences structural features, which are then aggregated by max pooling.Such architecture allows short propagation paths between the output layer and underlying feature detectors, enabling effective structural feature learning and extraction.We evaluate our models on two tasks: sentiment analysis and question classification.In both experiments, TBCNN outperforms previous state-of-the-art results, including existing neural networks and dedicated feature/rule engineering.We also make efforts to visualize the tree-based convolution process, shedding light on how our models work. Lili Mou, Hao Peng 0017, Ge Li 0001, Yan Xu 0013, Lu Zhang 0023, Zhi Jin 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2015 | A Comparative Study on Regularization Strategies for Embedding-based Neural NetworksabstractThis paper aims to compare different regularization strategies to address a common phenomenon, severe overfitting, in embedding-based neural networks for NLP.We chose two widely studied neural models and tasks as our testbed.We tried several frequently applied or newly proposed regularization strategies, including penalizing weights (embeddings excluded), penalizing embeddings, reembedding words, and dropout.We also emphasized on incremental hyperparameter tuning, and combining different regularizations.The results provide a picture on tuning hyperparameters for neural NLP models. Hao Peng 0017, Lili Mou, Ge Li 0001, Yunchuan Chen, Yangyang Lu, Zhi Jin 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2015 | Classifying Relations via Long Short Term Memory Networks along Shortest Dependency PathsabstractRelation classification is an important research arena in the field of natural language processing (NLP).In this paper, we present SDP-LSTM, a novel neural network to classify the relation of two entities in a sentence.Our neural architecture leverages the shortest dependency path (SDP) between two entities; multichannel recurrent neural networks, with long short term memory (LSTM) units, pick up heterogeneous information along the SDP.Our proposed model has several distinct features: (1) The shortest dependency paths retain most relevant information (to relation classification), while eliminating irrelevant words in the sentence.(2) The multichannel LSTM networks allow effective information integration from heterogeneous sources over the dependency paths.(3) A customized dropout strategy regularizes the neural network to alleviate overfitting.We test our model on the SemEval 2010 relation classification task, and achieve an F 1 -score of 83.7%, higher than competing methods in the literature. Yan Xu 0013, Lili Mou, Ge Li 0001, Yunchuan Chen, Hao Peng 0017, Zhi Jin 0001 |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2015 | Building Program Vector Representations for Deep LearningabstractDeep learning has made significant breakthroughs in various fields of artificial intelligence. However, it is still virtually impossible to use deep learning to analyze programs since deep architectures cannot be trained effectively with pure back propagation. In this pioneering paper, we propose the “coding criterion” to build program vector representations, which are the premise of deep learning for program analysis. We evaluate the learned vector representations both qualitatively and quantitatively. We conclude, based on the experiments, the coding criterion is successful in building program representations. To evaluate whether deep learning is beneficial for program analysis, we feed the representations to deep neural networks, and achieve higher accuracy in the program classification task than “shallow” methods. This result confirms the feasibility of deep learning to analyze programs. Hao Peng 0017, Lili Mou, Ge Li 0001, Yuxuan Liu 0004, Lu Zhang 0023, Zhi Jin 0001 |
KSEM | 1 |