EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mukta Prasad
dblp:69/863
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
3D vision · 41% Image recognition and object detection · 29% Information extraction and text analysis · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Finding nemo: Deformable object class modelling using curve matching · CVPR 2010 Single View Reconstruction of Curved Surfaces · CVPR (2) 2006 |
Geometric modeling and processing
procedural modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Is There a Procedural Logic to Architecture? · CVPR 2013 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Is There a Procedural Logic to Architecture? · CVPR 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble Partitioning for Unsupervised Image Categorization · ECCV (3) 2012 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
semantic annotation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Learning Domain Knowledge for Façade Labelling · ECCV (1) 2012 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › label-efficient image classification
unsupervised image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble Partitioning for Unsupervised Image Categorization · ECCV (3) 2012 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble Partitioning for Unsupervised Image Categorization · ECCV (3) 2012 |
Data mining › clustering
ensemble clustering |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Ensemble Partitioning for Unsupervised Image Categorization · ECCV (3) 2012 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object recognition
3d object classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Hough Transform and 3D SURF for Robust Three Dimensional Classification · ECCV (6) 2010 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › surface reconstruction
curved surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Single View Reconstruction of Curved Surfaces · CVPR (2) 2006 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
single-view 3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Single View Reconstruction of Curved Surfaces · CVPR (2) 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ensemble partitioning · 0.3clustering · 0.3grammatical inference · 0.2domain knowledge learning · 0.1optimization · 0.1non-rigid factorization · 0.1hough transform · 0.1curve matching · 0.13D SURF · 0.1closed-form solution · 0.1apparent contour reconstruction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Facial retargeting using neural networksabstractMapping the motion of an actor's face to a virtual model is a difficult but important problem, especially as fully animated characters are becoming more common in games and movies. Many methods have been proposed but most require the source and target to be structurally similar. Optical motion capture markers and blendshape weights are an example of topologically incongruous source and target examples that do not have a simple mapping between one another. In this paper, we created a system capable of determining this mapping through supervised learning of a small training dataset. Radial Basis Function Networks (RBFNs) have been used for retargeting markers to blendshape weights before but to our knowledge Multi-Layer Perceptron Artificial Neural Networks (referred to as ANNs) have not been employed in this way. We hypothesized that ANNs would result in a superior retargeting solution compared to the RBFN, due to their theoretically greater representational power. We implemented a retargeting system using ANNs and RBFNs for comparison. Our results found that both systems produced similar results (figure 1) and in some cases the ANN proved to be more expressive although the ANN was more difficult to work with. Timothy Costigan, Mukta Prasad, Rachel McDonnell |
MIG | 2 |
| 2013 | Is There a Procedural Logic to Architecture?abstractUrban models are key to navigation, architecture and entertainment. Apart from visualizing facades, a number of tedious tasks remain largely manual (e.g. compression, generating new facade designs and structurally comparing facades for classification, retrieval and clustering). We propose a novel procedural modelling method to automatically learn a grammar from a set of facades, generate new facade instances and compare facades. To deal with the difficulty of grammatical inference, we reformulate the problem. Instead of inferring a compromising, one-size-fits-all, single grammar for all tasks, we infer a model whose successive refinements are production rules tailored for each task. We demonstrate our automatic rule inference on datasets of two different architectural styles. Our method supercedes manual expert work and cuts the time required to build a procedural model of a facade from several days to a few milliseconds. Julien Weissenberg, Hayko Riemenschneider, Mukta Prasad, Luc Van Gool |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2012 | Ensemble Partitioning for Unsupervised Image Categorization
Dengxin Dai, Mukta Prasad, Christian Leistner, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (3) | 2 |
| 2012 | Learning Domain Knowledge for Façade Labelling
Dengxin Dai, Mukta Prasad, Gerhard Schmitt, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (1) | 2 |
| 2011 | Transforming Image CompletionabstractImage completion is an important photo-editing task which involves synthetically filling a hole in the image such that the image still appears natural. State-of-the-art image completion methods work by searching for patches in the image that fit well in the hole region. Our key insight is that image patches remain natural under a variety of transformations (such as scale, rotation and brightness change), and it is important to exploit this. We propose and investigate the use of different optimisation methods to search for the best patches and their respective transformations for producing consistent, improved completions. Experiments on a number of challenging problem instances demonstrate that our methods outperform state-of-the-art techniques. © 2011. The copyright of this document resides with its authors. Alex Mansfield, Mukta Prasad, Carsten Rother, Toby Sharp, Pushmeet Kohli, Luc Van Gool |
BMVC | 2 |
| 2011 | Class-specific 3D localization using constellations of object partsabstractImprovement in acquisition systems, has resulted in the ability to capture more realistic 3D models of real world objects, creating a need for better data processing techniques, as in the case of text and images. In this paper, we address the issue of learning class-specific, deformable, 3D part-based structure for object part localization in 3D models/scenes. We employ an inference framework upon fully connected part-based graphs inspired by Pictorial Structures (PS), which combine the local appearance of parts and the long-range structural properties. Using efficient tools for learning the model and performing inference, we show good results on a variety of classes, outperforming PS [7] and ISM [15]. Further, a similar inference framework is employed to find dense correspondences between 3D models, seeded by the above object part localization. Our results show promise for application in more complex 3D processing tasks such as part retrieval, pose estimation, scene understanding and recognition. © 2011. The copyright of this document resides with its authors. Mukta Prasad, Jan Knopp, Luc Van Gool |
BMVC | 1 |
| 2010 | Finding nemo: Deformable object class modelling using curve matchingabstractAn image search for “clownfish” yields many photos of clownfish, each of a different individual of a different 3D shape in a different pose. Yet, to the human observer, this set of images contains enough information to infer the underlying 3D deformable object class. Our goal is to recover such a deformable object class model directly from unordered images. For classes where feature-point correspondences can be found, this is a straightforward extension of non-rigid factorization, yielding a set of 3D basis shapes to explain the 2D data. However, when each image is of a different object instance, surface texture is generally unique to each individual, and does not give rise to usable image point correspondences. We overcome this sparsity using curve correspondences (crease-edge silhouettes or class-specific internal texture edges). Even rigid contour reconstruction is difficult due to the lack of reliable correspondences. We incorporate correspondence variation into the optimization, thereby extending contour-based reconstruction techniques to deformable object modelling. The notion of correspondence is extended to include mappings between 2D image curves and corresponding parts of the desired 3D object surface. Combined with class-specific priors, our method enables effective de-formable class reconstruction from unordered images, despite significant occlusion and the scarcity of shared 2D image features. Mukta Prasad, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon, Andrew Zisserman, Luc Van Gool |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2010 | Hough Transform and 3D SURF for Robust Three Dimensional Classification
Jan Knopp, Mukta Prasad, Geert Willems, Radu Timofte, Luc Van Gool |
ECCV (6) | 2 |
| 2006 | Single View Reconstruction of Curved SurfacesabstractRecent advances in single-view reconstruction (SVR) have been in modelling power (curved 2.5D surfaces) and automation (automatic photo pop-up). We extend SVR along both of these directions. We increase modelling power in several ways: (i) We represent general 3D surfaces, rather than 2.5D Monge patches; (ii) We describe a closed-form method to reconstruct a smooth surface from its image apparent contour, including multilocal singularities ("kidney-bean" self-occlusions); (iii) We show how to incorporate user-specified data such as surface normals, interpolation and approximation constraints; (iv) We show how this algorithm can be adapted to deal with surfaces of arbitrary genus. We also show how the modelling process can be automated for simple object shapes and views, using a-priori object class information. We demonstrate these advances on natural images drawn from a number of object classes. Mukta Prasad, Andrew W. Fitzgibbon |
CVPR (2) | 1 |