Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Sherae L. Daniel

dblp:70/123 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7471-5701ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 91% Software maintenance and evolution · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.612022
Deconstructing the Nature of Collaboration in Organizations Open Source Software Development: The Impact of Developer and Task Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.612022
Deconstructing the Nature of Collaboration in Organizations Open Source Software Development: The Impact of Developer and Task Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022
Empirical software engineering › open source software
open source software development
0.612022
Deconstructing the Nature of Collaboration in Organizations Open Source Software Development: The Impact of Developer and Task Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems
0.212022
Deconstructing the Nature of Collaboration in Organizations Open Source Software Development: The Impact of Developer and Task Characteristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.6empirical study · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Deconstructing the Nature of Collaboration in Organizations Open Source Software Development: The Impact of Developer and Task Characteristics
abstract
One opportunity for organizations to participate in open source software (OSS) development is throughorganizations OSS(orgsOSS), a term we use to describe a group of organizations that commit resources to collectively develop OSS. This archetype of OSS development is distinct from other types that include organizations, yet is understudied. As organizations increasingly contribute to and rely on OSS as part of their strategy, understanding how they can collaborate to build software holds importance for the future of software development. This study collects a unique dataset of development tasks from a large orgsOSS project spanning over two years and seven releases. Building on existing OSS research, we explore norms with respect to collaboration, i.e., how developers assign, discuss, and complete tasks, in an orgsOSS project. Interestingly, our analysis reveals that developers in orgsOSS do not always adhere to ideals of widespread sharing and participation espoused by traditional OSS, however some developer and task characteristics helped foster these ideals. Based on these and other findings, we develop a set of propositions and associated collaboration mechanisms that are important to future orgsOSS and other similarly structured software development projects.
Binny M. Samuel, Hillol Bala, Sherae L. Daniel, V. Ramesh
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
2018 Sourcing knowledge in open source software projects: The impacts of internal and external social capital on project success
Sherae L. Daniel, Vishal Midha, Anol Bhattacherjee, Shivendu Pratap Singh
J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.1
2016 Open source project success: Resource access, flow, and integration
Sherae L. Daniel, Katherine J. Stewart
J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.1