Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jaana Simola

dblp:70/2575 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8273-685XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 50% Information retrieval · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.112005
Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
implicit relevance feedback
0.112005
Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval · SIGIR 2005
Wearable and physiological sensing
eye tracking
0.012005
Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval · SIGIR 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic latent variable model · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 The Effect of Curiosity on Eye Movements During Reading of Health Related Arguments
abstract
No abstract available.
Hanna Julku, Caitlin Dawson, Jaana Simola
ETRA3
2005 Combining eye movements and collaborative filtering for proactive information retrieval
abstract
We study a new task, proactive information retrieval by combining implicit relevance feedback and collaborative filtering. We have constructed a controlled experimental setting, a prototype application, in which the users try to find interesting scientific articles by browsing their titles. Implicit feedback is inferred from eye movement signals, with discriminative hidden Markov models estimated from existing data in which explicit relevance feedback is available. Collaborative filtering is carried out using the User Rating Profile model, a state-of-the-art probabilistic latent variable model, computed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. For new document titles the prediction accuracy with eye movements, collaborative filtering, and their combination was significantly better than by chance. The best prediction accuracy still leaves room for improvement but shows that proactive information retrieval and combination of many sources of relevance feedback is feasible.
Kai Puolamäki, Jarkko Salojärvi, Eerika Savia, Jaana Simola, Samuel Kaski
SIGIR4
2004 Reading vertical text from a computer screen
abstract
In Western languages, text is traditionally presented in horizontal lines. However, reading of vertically arranged text might be more efficient because of the elimination of horizontal eye movements. We investigated the effect of vertical arrangement upon reading text presented on a computer screen. Even though vertically aligned text was read at a slower rate than horizontally aligned text, the difference was smaller than in previous studies. Analysis of eye-movement data revealed that there were no differences in fixation numbers and numbers of regressions between vertical formats and the standard-text format. But fixation durations were shorter for the standard-text format than for the vertical formats. Taken together, the results indicate that reading vertically presented text from a display device may be nearly as efficient as reading normal horizontal text. Therefore, the fact that text is normally vertically arranged in small-screen devices is not a usability problem.
Jari Laarni, Jaana Simola, Ilpo Kojo, Risto Näsänen
Behav. Inf. Technol.2