Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keshav Mundhra

dblp:70/3200 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
interception
0.132003
Perceptual navigation strategy: a unified approach to interception of ground balls and fly balls · ICRA 2003
Spatial Interception for Mobile Robots · ICRA 2002
Intercepting a Falling Object: Digital Video Robot · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › mobile robot control
perceptual navigation
0.022003
Perceptual navigation strategy: a unified approach to interception of ground balls and fly balls · ICRA 2003
Intercepting a Falling Object: Digital Video Robot · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.012002
Spatial Interception for Mobile Robots · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › sensor-based control
visual servoing
0.012002
Spatial Interception for Mobile Robots · ICRA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optical acceleration cancellation · 0.1computer simulation · 0.0optical trajectory · 0.0inverted OAC · 0.0digital image processing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Perceptual navigation strategy: a unified approach to interception of ground balls and fly balls
abstract
In previous work, we demonstrated the feasibility of perceptual navigation algorithms used to intercept fly balls. In this paper we expand the optical acceleration cancellation heuristic to also intercept ground balls. We used computer simulations and experiments with mobile robots with various bail trajectories and different initial positions of the fielder to test our new model. A new robotic system with improved vision and faster processing was developed for experimentally intercepting ground balls. The results support the generality of viewer based interception heuristics for both fly balls and ground balls.
Keshav Mundhra, Thomas Sugar, Michael K. McBeath
ICRA1
2002 Intercepting a Falling Object: Digital Video Robot
abstract
Human based algorithms; to catch fly balls have been research and studied. In the paper, the validity of the human models are tested by catching balls that are dropped vertically downward. The regular OAC (optical acceleration cancellation) and the inverted OAC models are simulated first, and then tested experimentally with a mobile robot. The simulation and the experimental results show that both methods are able to intercept the dropped ball, but the initial and final motions are different. A digital image processing program, DVRobot, was written to process digital images very quickly.
Keshav Mundhra, Anthony Suluh, Thomas Sugar, Michael K. McBeath
ICRA1
2002 Spatial Interception for Mobile Robots
abstract
Human based vision algorithms for interception of flying balls in one-dimension have been researched and studied. We develop new perceptual strategies for three-dimensional space that are robust and simple. Results from simulations show the feasibility of human vision algorithms for ball catching. This paper discusses the experimental validation of two perceptual algorithms: linear optical trajectory and the optical acceleration cancellation.
Anthony Suluh, Keshav Mundhra, Thomas Sugar, Michael K. McBeath
ICRA2