Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gustavo Villavicencio

dblp:70/6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Compilers and program optimization · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation
0.112014
Software maintenance like maintenance in other engineering disciplines · SIGSOFT FSE 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

search-based software engineering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Toward Ordering the Set of Modifications to Solve a Maintenance Request
abstract
In this paper we set out the idea that the text plain nature of the software source code, as we know it today, is a strong obstacle for an effective maintenance. The reason is that all the software artifact elements, from the most complex to the simplest, are immediately available to the maintenance programmer. Such ease is deceitful since it allows the maintenance programmer to modify any component in any order. However, maintenance in any engineering field is inside-out intrinsically, and such essential characteristic should also be held in software maintenance. The maintenance scenario suggested here restricts modifications by the maintenance programmer and drives her to implement them following an order.
Gustavo Villavicencio
COMPSAC1
2014 Software maintenance like maintenance in other engineering disciplines
abstract
abstract Software maintenance exhibits many differences regarding how other engineering disciplines carry out maintenance on their artifacts. Such dissimilarity is caused due to the fact that it is easy to get a copy from the original artifact to be used in maintenance, and also because the flat dimension of the software text facilitates access to the components by simply using a text editor. Other engineering disciplines resort to different artifact versions (obtained by dissassembling) where the introduction of modifications (previous comprehension) is easier. After which the artifact is reassembled. In software engineering this approach can be simulated by combining program transformation techniques, search-based software engineering technology and design attributes. %%This easiness (absent in the other engineering sciences) as well as the intangible software nature can lead to the belief %%that a software maintenance model similar to those of the other engineering sciences is unnecessary or unfeasible. %%This paper states the opposite, and as a consequence, an entirely new and more robust software maintenance model emerges. abstract
Gustavo Villavicencio
SIGSOFT FSE1