Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gustavo Villavicencio
dblp:70/6
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Compilers and program optimization · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Software maintenance like maintenance in other engineering disciplines · SIGSOFT FSE 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
search-based software engineering · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Toward Ordering the Set of Modifications to Solve a Maintenance RequestabstractIn this paper we set out the idea that the text plain nature of the software source code, as we know it today, is a strong obstacle for an effective maintenance. The reason is that all the software artifact elements, from the most complex to the simplest, are immediately available to the maintenance programmer. Such ease is deceitful since it allows the maintenance programmer to modify any component in any order. However, maintenance in any engineering field is inside-out intrinsically, and such essential characteristic should also be held in software maintenance. The maintenance scenario suggested here restricts modifications by the maintenance programmer and drives her to implement them following an order. Gustavo Villavicencio |
COMPSAC | 1 |
| 2014 | Software maintenance like maintenance in other engineering disciplinesabstractabstract Software maintenance exhibits many differences regarding how other engineering disciplines carry out maintenance on their artifacts. Such dissimilarity is caused due to the fact that it is easy to get a copy from the original artifact to be used in maintenance, and also because the flat dimension of the software text facilitates access to the components by simply using a text editor. Other engineering disciplines resort to different artifact versions (obtained by dissassembling) where the introduction of modifications (previous comprehension) is easier. After which the artifact is reassembled. In software engineering this approach can be simulated by combining program transformation techniques, search-based software engineering technology and design attributes. %%This easiness (absent in the other engineering sciences) as well as the intangible software nature can lead to the belief %%that a software maintenance model similar to those of the other engineering sciences is unnecessary or unfeasible. %%This paper states the opposite, and as a consequence, an entirely new and more robust software maintenance model emerges. abstract Gustavo Villavicencio |
SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |