Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Renxiao Wang

dblp:70/6147 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-0485-0259ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › computational drug discovery
protein-ligand interaction prediction
0.212016
Alloscore: a method for predicting allosteric ligand-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.212015
PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery
0.112016
Alloscore: a method for predicting allosteric ligand-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
virtual screening
0.112016
Alloscore: a method for predicting allosteric ligand-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular recognition
0.112015
PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Enhance the performance of current scoring functions with the aid of 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints
abstract
BACKGROUND: In structure-based drug design, binding affinity prediction remains as a challenging goal for current scoring functions. Development of target-biased scoring functions provides a new possibility for tackling this problem, but this approach is also associated with certain technical difficulties. We previously reported the Knowledge-Guided Scoring (KGS) method as an alternative approach (BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11, 193-208). The key idea is to compute the binding affinity of a given protein-ligand complex based on the known binding data of an appropriate reference complex, so the error in binding affinity prediction can be reduced effectively. RESULTS: In this study, we have developed an upgraded version, i.e. KGS2, by employing 3D protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in reference selection. KGS2 was evaluated in combination with four scoring functions (X-Score, ChemPLP, ASP, and GoldScore) on five drug targets (HIV-1 protease, carbonic anhydrase 2, beta-secretase 1, beta-trypsin, and checkpoint kinase 1). In the in situ scoring test, considerable improvements were observed in most cases after application of KGS2. Besides, the performance of KGS2 was always better than KGS in all cases. In the more challenging molecular docking test, application of KGS2 also led to improved structure-activity relationship in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: KGS2 can be applied as a convenient "add-on" to current scoring functions without the need to re-engineer them, and its application is not limited to certain target proteins as customized scoring functions. As an interpolation method, its accuracy in principle can be improved further with the increasing knowledge of protein-ligand complex structures and binding affinity data. We expect that KGS2 will become a practical tool for enhancing the performance of current scoring functions in binding affinity prediction. The KGS2 software is available upon contacting the authors.
Minyi Su, Yan Li 0051, Renxiao Wang
BMC Bioinform.6
2016 Alloscore: a method for predicting allosteric ligand-protein interactions
abstract
UNLABELLED: Allosteric ligands have increasingly gained attention as potential therapeutic agents due to their higher target selectivity and lower toxicity compared with classic orthosteric ligands. Despite the great interest in the development of allosteric drugs as a new tactic in drug discovery, the understanding of the ligand-protein interactions underlying allosteric binding represents a key challenge. Herein, we introduce Alloscore, a web server that predicts the binding affinities of allosteric ligand-protein interactions. This method exhibits prominent performance in describing allosteric binding and could be useful in allosteric virtual screening and the structural optimization of allosteric agonists/antagonists. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Alloscore server and tutorials are freely available at http://mdl.shsmu.edu.cn/alloscore CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Qiancheng Shen, Minyi Su, Xinyi Liu 0003, Shaoyong Lu, Zhongjie Chen, Renxiao Wang, Jian Zhang 0037
Bioinform.7
2015 PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database
abstract
MOTIVATION: Molecular recognition between biological macromolecules and organic small molecules plays an important role in various life processes. Both structural information and binding data of biomolecular complexes are indispensable for depicting the underlying mechanism in such an event. The PDBbind database was created to collect experimentally measured binding data for the biomolecular complexes throughout the Protein Data Bank (PDB). It thus provides the linkage between structural information and energetic properties of biomolecular complexes, which is especially desirable for computational studies or statistical analyses. RESULTS: Since its first public release in 2004, the PDBbind database has been updated on an annual basis. The latest release (version 2013) provides experimental binding affinity data for 10,776 biomolecular complexes in PDB, including 8302 protein-ligand complexes and 2474 other types of complexes. In this article, we will describe the current methods used for compiling PDBbind and the updated status of this database. We will also review some typical applications of PDBbind published in the scientific literature. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All contents of this database are freely accessible at the PDBbind-CN Web server at http://www.pdbbind-cn.org/. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Yan Li 0051, Zhixiong Zhao, Renxiao Wang
Bioinform.9
2010 A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction
abstract
BACKGROUND: Current scoring functions are not very successful in protein-ligand binding affinity prediction albeit their popularity in structure-based drug designs. Here, we propose a general knowledge-guided scoring (KGS) strategy to tackle this problem. Our KGS strategy computes the binding constant of a given protein-ligand complex based on the known binding constant of an appropriate reference complex. A good training set that includes a sufficient number of protein-ligand complexes with known binding data needs to be supplied for finding the reference complex. The reference complex is required to share a similar pattern of key protein-ligand interactions to that of the complex of interest. Thus, some uncertain factors in protein-ligand binding may cancel out, resulting in a more accurate prediction of absolute binding constants. RESULTS: In our study, an automatic algorithm was developed for summarizing key protein-ligand interactions as a pharmacophore model and identifying the reference complex with a maximal similarity to the query complex. Our KGS strategy was evaluated in combination with two scoring functions (X-Score and PLP) on three test sets, containing 112 HIV protease complexes, 44 carbonic anhydrase complexes, and 73 trypsin complexes, respectively. Our results obtained on crystal structures as well as computer-generated docking poses indicated that application of the KGS strategy produced more accurate predictions especially when X-Score or PLP alone did not perform well. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other targeted scoring functions, our KGS strategy does not require any re-parameterization or modification on current scoring methods, and its application is not tied to certain systems. The effectiveness of our KGS strategy is in theory proportional to the ever-increasing knowledge of experimental protein-ligand binding data. Our KGS strategy may serve as a more practical remedy for current scoring functions to improve their accuracy in binding affinity prediction.
Tiejun Cheng, Renxiao Wang
BMC Bioinform.3