Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph O. Dada

dblp:70/7182 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-4489-5876ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › scientific data management
data standards
0.112010
SBRML: a markup language for associating systems biology data with models · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology
0.112010
SBRML: a markup language for associating systems biology data with models · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

XML · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 SBRML: a markup language for associating systems biology data with models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Research in systems biology is carried out through a combination of experiments and models. Several data standards have been adopted for representing models (Systems Biology Markup Language) and various types of relevant experimental data (such as FuGE and those of the Proteomics Standards Initiative). However, until now, there has been no standard way to associate a model and its entities to the corresponding datasets, or vice versa. Such a standard would provide a means to represent computational simulation results as well as to frame experimental data in the context of a particular model. Target applications include model-driven data analysis, parameter estimation, and sharing and archiving model simulations. RESULTS: We propose the Systems Biology Results Markup Language (SBRML), an XML-based language that associates a model with several datasets. Each dataset is represented as a series of values associated with model variables, and their corresponding parameter values. SBRML provides a flexible way of indexing the results to model parameter values, which supports both spreadsheet-like data and multidimensional data cubes. We present and discuss several examples of SBRML usage in applications such as enzyme kinetics, microarray gene expression and various types of simulation results. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The XML Schema file for SBRML is available at http://www.comp-sys-bio.org/SBRML under the Academic Free License (AFL) v3.0.
Joseph O. Dada, Irena Spasic, Norman W. Paton, Pedro Mendes 0001
Bioinform.1
2010 Systematic integration of experimental data and models in systems biology
abstract
BACKGROUND: The behaviour of biological systems can be deduced from their mathematical models. However, multiple sources of data in diverse forms are required in the construction of a model in order to define its components and their biochemical reactions, and corresponding parameters. Automating the assembly and use of systems biology models is dependent upon data integration processes involving the interoperation of data and analytical resources. RESULTS: Taverna workflows have been developed for the automated assembly of quantitative parameterised metabolic networks in the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML). A SBML model is built in a systematic fashion by the workflows which starts with the construction of a qualitative network using data from a MIRIAM-compliant genome-scale model of yeast metabolism. This is followed by parameterisation of the SBML model with experimental data from two repositories, the SABIO-RK enzyme kinetics database and a database of quantitative experimental results. The models are then calibrated and simulated in workflows that call out to COPASIWS, the web service interface to the COPASI software application for analysing biochemical networks. These systems biology workflows were evaluated for their ability to construct a parameterised model of yeast glycolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Distributed information about metabolic reactions that have been described to MIRIAM standards enables the automated assembly of quantitative systems biology models of metabolic networks based on user-defined criteria. Such data integration processes can be implemented as Taverna workflows to provide a rapid overview of the components and their relationships within a biochemical system.
Peter Li, Joseph O. Dada, Daniel Jameson, Irena Spasic, Neil Swainston, Kathleen Carroll, Warwick B. Dunn, Farid Khan, Naglis Malys, Hanan L. Messiha, Evangelos Simeonidis, Dieter Weichart, Catherine Winder, Jill Wishart, David S. Broomhead, Carole A. Goble, Simon J. Gaskell, Douglas B. Kell, Hans V. Westerhoff, Pedro Mendes 0001, Norman W. Paton
BMC Bioinform.2