EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sam Hallman
dblp:70/8652
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 43% 3D vision · 20% Video understanding and tracking · 20% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Layered Object Models for Image Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 Layered object detection for multi-class segmentation · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
boundary detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Oriented edge forests for boundary detection · CVPR 2015 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
background subtraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting Dynamic Objects with Multi-view Background Subtraction · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting Dynamic Objects with Multi-view Background Subtraction · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion detection
moving object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting Dynamic Objects with Multi-view Background Subtraction · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Detecting Dynamic Objects with Multi-view Background Subtraction · ICCV 2013 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Layered Object Models for Image Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Layered Object Models for Image Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
multi-class segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Layered object detection for multi-class segmentation · CVPR 2010 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
edge detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Oriented edge forests for boundary detection · CVPR 2015 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
probabilistic generative model |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Layered Object Models for Image Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Layered object detection for multi-class segmentation · CVPR 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.2oriented edge clustering · 0.2multiscale calibration · 0.2template-based detection · 0.2multi-view stereo · 0.2object detector ensemble · 0.1generative probabilistic model · 0.1object detector bank · 0.1layered model · 0.1depth ordering estimation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Oriented edge forests for boundary detectionabstractWe present a simple, efficient model for learning boundary detection based on a random forest classifier. Our approach combines (1) efficient clustering of training examples based on a simple partitioning of the space of local edge orientations and (2) scale-dependent calibration of individual tree output probabilities prior to multiscale combination. The resulting model outperforms published results on the challenging BSDS500 boundary detection benchmark. Further, on large datasets our model requires substantially less memory for training and speeds up training time by a factor of 10 over the structured forest model. Sam Hallman, Charless C. Fowlkes |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2015 | Analysis of in vivo single cell behavior by high throughput, human-in-the-loop segmentation of three-dimensional imagesabstractBACKGROUND: Analysis of single cells in their native environment is a powerful method to address key questions in developmental systems biology. Confocal microscopy imaging of intact tissues, followed by automatic image segmentation, provides a means to conduct cytometric studies while at the same time preserving crucial information about the spatial organization of the tissue and morphological features of the cells. This technique is rapidly evolving but is still not in widespread use among research groups that do not specialize in technique development, perhaps in part for lack of tools that automate repetitive tasks while allowing experts to make the best use of their time in injecting their domain-specific knowledge. RESULTS: Here we focus on a well-established stem cell model system, the C. elegans gonad, as well as on two other model systems widely used to study cell fate specification and morphogenesis: the pre-implantation mouse embryo and the developing mouse olfactory epithelium. We report a pipeline that integrates machine-learning-based cell detection, fast human-in-the-loop curation of these detections, and running of active contours seeded from detections to segment cells. The procedure can be bootstrapped by a small number of manual detections, and outperforms alternative pieces of software we benchmarked on C. elegans gonad datasets. Using cell segmentations to quantify fluorescence contents, we report previously-uncharacterized cell behaviors in the model systems we used. We further show how cell morphological features can be used to identify cell cycle phase; this provides a basis for future tools that will streamline cell cycle experiments by minimizing the need for exogenous cell cycle phase labels. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput 3D segmentation makes it possible to extract rich information from images that are routinely acquired by biologists, and provides insights - in particular with respect to the cell cycle - that would be difficult to derive otherwise. Michael Chiang, Sam Hallman, Amanda Cinquin, Nabora de Mochel, Adrian Paz, Shimako Kawauchi, Anne L. Calof, Ken Cho, Charless C. Fowlkes, Olivier Cinquin |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2013 | Detecting Dynamic Objects with Multi-view Background SubtractionabstractThe confluence of robust algorithms for structure from motion along with high-coverage mapping and imaging of the world around us suggests that it will soon be feasible to accurately estimate camera pose for a large class photographs taken in outdoor, urban environments. In this paper, we investigate how such information can be used to improve the detection of dynamic objects such as pedestrians and cars. First, we show that when rough camera location is known, we can utilize detectors that have been trained with a scene-specific background model in order to improve detection accuracy. Second, when precise camera pose is available, dense matching to a database of existing images using multi-view stereo provides a way to eliminate static backgrounds such as building facades, akin to background-subtraction often used in video analysis. We evaluate these ideas using a dataset of tourist photos with estimated camera pose. For template-based pedestrian detection, we achieve a 50 percent boost in average precision over baseline. Raúl Díaz, Sam Hallman, Charless C. Fowlkes |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2012 | Layered Object Models for Image SegmentationabstractWe formulate a layered model for object detection and image segmentation. We describe a generative probabilistic model that composites the output of a bank of object detectors in order to define shape masks and explain the appearance, depth ordering, and labels of all pixels in an image. Notably, our system estimates both class labels and object instance labels. Building on previous benchmark criteria for object detection and image segmentation, we define a novel score that evaluates both class and instance segmentation. We evaluate our system on the PASCAL 2009 and 2010 segmentation challenge data sets and show good test results with state-of-the-art performance in several categories, including segmenting humans. Yi Yang 0007, Sam Hallman, Deva Ramanan, Charless C. Fowlkes |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2010 | Layered object detection for multi-class segmentationabstractWe formulate a layered model for object detection and multi-class segmentation. Our system uses the output of a bank of object detectors in order to define shape priors for support masks and then estimates appearance, depth ordering and labeling of pixels in the image. We train our system on the PASCAL segmentation challenge dataset and show good test results with state of the art performance in several categories including segmenting humans. Yi Yang 0007, Sam Hallman, Deva Ramanan, Charless C. Fowlkes |
CVPR | 2 |