Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David J. Anthony

dblp:70/9717 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
4 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 95% Cellular and mobile networks · 5%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 54% Legged, aerial and field robots · 46%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.322014
Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles · SenSys 2014
Crane charades: behavior identification via backpack mounted sensor platforms · IPSN 2012
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment
0.322015
Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles · SenSys 2014
Surface classification for sensor deployment from UAV landings · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
terrain classification
0.212015
Surface classification for sensor deployment from UAV landings · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
unmanned aerial vehicle
0.212014
Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles · SenSys 2014
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › target tracking
animal tracking
0.112012
Crane charades: behavior identification via backpack mounted sensor platforms · IPSN 2012
Internet of things and sensor networks › environmental sensing
wildlife monitoring
0.112012
Sensing through the continent: towards monitoring migratory birds using cellular sensor networks · IPSN 2012
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › context recognition
human behavior recognition
0.012012
Crane charades: behavior identification via backpack mounted sensor platforms · IPSN 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision tree · 0.4accelerometer features · 0.4SVM · 0.4QDA · 0.4LDA · 0.4surface classification · 0.4on-board classification · 0.3energy harvesting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Surface classification for sensor deployment from UAV landings
abstract
Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to deploy sensor networks promises an autonomous and useful method of installation in remote or hard to access locations. Some sensors, such as soil moisture sensors, must be physically installed in soft soil, yet UAVs cannot easily determine soil softness with remote sensors. In this paper, we use data from an onboard accelerometer measured during UAV landings to determine the softness of the ground. We collect and analyze over 200 data sets gathered from 8 different materials: foam, carpet, wood, tile, grass, dirt, concrete, and woodchips. Based on this analysis, we examine a number of features from the accelerometer and four classification algorithms: LDA, QDA, SVM, and binary decision trees. The decision tree performs well and is simple to implement onboard the UAV. We implement this in our UAV control system and perform experiments to verify that the UAV can accurately classify the softness of the surface with 90% accuracy. This lays the groundwork for our future work on developing a UAV capable of installing sensors in soft soil.
David J. Anthony, Elizabeth Basha, Jared Ostdiek, John-Paul Ore, Carrick Detweiler
ICRA1
2014 On crop height estimation with UAVs
abstract
Remote sensing by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) is changing the way agriculture operates by increasing the spatial-temporal resolution of data collection. Micro-UAVs have the potential to further improve and enrich the data collected by operating close to the crops, enabling the collection of higher spatio-temporal resolution data. In this paper, we present a UAV-mounted measurement system that utilizes a laser scanner to compute crop heights, a critical indicator of crop health. The system filters, transforms, and analyzes the cluttered range data in real-time to determine the distance to the ground and to the top of the crops. We assess the system in an indoor testbed and in a corn field. Our findings indicate that despite the dense canopy and highly variable sensor readings, we can precisely fly over crops and measure its height to within 5cm of measurements gathered using current measurement technology.
David J. Anthony, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Aaron Lorenz, Carrick Detweiler
IROS1
2014 Controlled sensor network installation with unmanned aerial vehicles
abstract
Robots improve wireless sensor network (WSN) deployments by reducing deployment times, deploying nodes to improve coverage, and ferrying data. Utilizing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to install sensor networks in environmentally sensitive areas is especially valuable, as the UAVs are able to quickly traverse rough and environmentally sensitive terrain. UAV based deployments are challenging, as the UAVs may need to install nodes in a specific orientation or location type, which is difficult to sense from a UAV. We present our work towards resolving these difficulties by first classifying the surface a UAV has landed on, and then conducting a post-deployment analysis of the installation.
David J. Anthony, John-Paul Ore, Carrick Detweiler, Elizabeth Basha
SenSys1
2012 Sensing through the continent: towards monitoring migratory birds using cellular sensor networks
abstract
This paper presents CraneTracker, a novel sensor platform for monitoring migratory birds. The platform is designed to monitor Whooping Cranes, an endangered species that conducts an annual migration of 4,000 km between southern Texas and north-central Canada. CraneTracker includes a rich set of sensors, a multi-modal radio, and power control circuitry for sustainable, continental-scale information delivery during migration. The need for large-scale connectivity motivates the use of cellular technology in low-cost sensor platforms augmented by a low-power transceiver for ad-hoc connectivity. This platform leads to a new class of cellular sensor networks (CSNs) for time-critical and mobile sensing applications. The CraneTracker is evaluated via field tests on Wild Turkeys, Siberian Cranes, and an on-going alpha deployment with wild Sandhill Cranes. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the potential of energy-harvesting CSNs for wildlife monitoring in large geographical areas, and reveal important insights into the movements and behaviors of migratory animals. In addition to benefiting ecological research, the developed platform is expected to extend the application domain of sensor networks and enable future research applications.
David J. Anthony, William P. Bennett, Mehmet Can Vuran, Matthew B. Dwyer, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Anne Lacy, Mike Engels, Walter Wehtje
IPSN1
2012 Crane charades: behavior identification via backpack mounted sensor platforms
abstract
The Whooping Crane is an endangered species native to North America and there are approximately 575 in existence. There have been recent efforts to provide ecologists with a tool to study the multifaceted behavior of the endangered species. Like many species, cranes display distinctly identifiable movements while being threatened, acting territorial, migrating, or preening. The preliminary experiments described in this poster provide evidence that sensor data presented by a novel sensing platform, the CraneTracker, can be used to identify crane behaviors on-board. With the ability to identify these behaviors, ecologists will have a more granular insight on what occurs during a crane's life on a daily basis.
William P. Bennett, Megan Fitzpatrick, David J. Anthony, Mehmet Can Vuran, Anne Lacy
IPSN3
2010 Simulating and testing mobile wireless sensor networks
abstract
Developing applications for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) can provide many challenges. Environmental conditions have a large impact on the behavior of an application, but it may not be feasible to replicate the conditions of the deployment environment while creating the application. Furthermore, long-term deployment of monitoring applications require extensive pre-deployment analysis of such applications since the sensors cannot be accessed after their deployment. Through a combination of simulation and software engineering practices, it is possible to rigorously test and validate the software for WSNs. In this paper, several methods for simulating distributed mobile WSNs and testing the software are provided. These methods are used in the development of a WSN that was deployed to track Whooping Cranes during their year long migration.
David J. Anthony, William P. Bennett, Mehmet Can Vuran, Matthew B. Dwyer, Sebastian G. Elbaum, Felipe Chavez-Ramirez
MSWiM1