Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ran Taig

dblp:71/10257 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
compilation to classical planning
0.212014
Compilation Based Approaches to Probabilistic Planning - Thesis Summary · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
conformant probabilistic planning
0.212014
A Relevance-Based Compilation Method for Conformant Probabilistic Planning · AAAI 2014
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
probabilistic planning
0.212014
Compilation Based Approaches to Probabilistic Planning - Thesis Summary · AAAI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

conformant planning compilation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Compilation Based Approaches to Probabilistic Planning - Thesis Summary
Ran Taig
AAAI1
2014 A Relevance-Based Compilation Method for Conformant Probabilistic Planning
abstract
Conformant probabilistic planning (CPP) differs from conformant planning (CP) by two key elements: the initial belief state is probabilistic,and the conformant plan must achieve the goal with probability $\geq\theta$, for some $0<\theta\leq 1$. In earlier work we observed that one can reduce CPP to CP by finding a set of initial states whose probability $\geq\theta$, for whicha conformant plan exists. In previous solvers we used the underlying planner to select this set of states and to plan for them simultaneously. Here we suggest an alternative approach: start with relevance analysis to determine a promising set of initial states on which to focus. Then, call an off-the-shelf conformant planner to solve the resulting problem. This approach has a number of advantages. First, instead of depending on the heuristic function to select the set of initial states,we can introduce specific, efficient relevance reasoning techniques. Second, we can benefit from optimizations used by conformant planners that are unsound when applied to the original CPP. Finally, we are free to use any existing (or new) CP solver. Consequently, the new planner dominates previous solvers on almost all domains and scales to instances that were not solved before.
Ran Taig, Ronen I. Brafman
AAAI1