Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kim Kenobi

dblp:71/11508 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7074-7159ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction
0.612022
No one tool to rule them all: prokaryotic gene prediction tool annotations are highly dependent on the organism of study · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.612022
No one tool to rule them all: prokaryotic gene prediction tool annotations are highly dependent on the organism of study · Bioinform. 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation › gene prediction
prokaryotic gene prediction
0.612022
No one tool to rule them all: prokaryotic gene prediction tool annotations are highly dependent on the organism of study · Bioinform. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

performance metrics · 0.6benchmarking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 No one tool to rule them all: prokaryotic gene prediction tool annotations are highly dependent on the organism of study
abstract
MOTIVATION: The biases in CoDing Sequence (CDS) prediction tools, which have been based on historic genomic annotations from model organisms, impact our understanding of novel genomes and metagenomes. This hinders the discovery of new genomic information as it results in predictions being biased towards existing knowledge. To date, users have lacked a systematic and replicable approach to identify the strengths and weaknesses of any CDS prediction tool and allow them to choose the right tool for their analysis. RESULTS: We present an evaluation framework (ORForise) based on a comprehensive set of 12 primary and 60 secondary metrics that facilitate the assessment of the performance of CDS prediction tools. This makes it possible to identify which performs better for specific use-cases. We use this to assess 15 ab initio- and model-based tools representing those most widely used (historically and currently) to generate the knowledge in genomic databases. We find that the performance of any tool is dependent on the genome being analysed, and no individual tool ranked as the most accurate across all genomes or metrics analysed. Even the top-ranked tools produced conflicting gene collections, which could not be resolved by aggregation. The ORForise evaluation framework provides users with a replicable, data-led approach to make informed tool choices for novel genome annotations and for refining historical annotations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and datasets for reproduction and customisation are available at https://github.com/NickJD/ORForise. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Nicholas J. Dimonaco, Wayne Aubrey, Kim Kenobi, Amanda Clare, Christopher J. Creevey
Bioinform.3
2012 Tissue-level segmentation and tracking of cells in growing plant roots
Vijaya Sethuraman, Andrew P. French, Darren M. Wells, Kim Kenobi, Tony P. Pridmore
Mach. Vis. Appl.4
2012 Robust Bayesian Clustering for Replicated Gene Expression Data
abstract
Experimental scientific data sets, especially biology data, usually contain replicated measurements. The replicated measurements for the same object are correlated, and this correlation must be carefully dealt with in scientific analysis. In this paper, we propose a robust Bayesian mixture model for clustering data sets with replicated measurements. The model aims not only to accurately cluster the data points taking the replicated measurements into consideration, but also to find the outliers (i.e., scattered objects) which are possibly required to be studied further. A tree-structured variational Bayes (VB) algorithm is developed to carry out model fitting. Experimental studies showed that our model compares favorably with the infinite Gaussian mixture model, while maintaining computational simplicity. We demonstrate the benefits of including the replicated measurements in the model, in terms of improved outlier detection rates in varying measurement uncertainty conditions. Finally, we apply the approach to clustering biological transcriptomics mRNA expression data sets with replicated measurements.
Jianyong Sun, Jonathan M. Garibaldi, Kim Kenobi
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.3