Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Calvin Lue
dblp:71/1204
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 50% Indexing and storage engines · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
distributed information retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997 |
Indexing and storage engines › multidimensional indexing
grid file |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997 |
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
resource selection |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997 |
Indexing and storage engines
synopsis structure |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | Data Structures for Efficient Broker ImplementationabstractWith the profusion of text databases on the Internet, it is becoming increasingly hard to find the most useful databases for a given query. To attack this problem, several existing and proposed systems employ brokers to direct user queries, using a local database of summary information about the available databases. This summary information must effectively distinguish relevant databases and must be compact while allowing efficient access. We offer evidence that one broker, GlOSS , can be effective at locating databases of interest even in a system of hundreds of databased and can examine the performance of accessing the GlOSS summeries for two promising storage methods: the grid file and partitioned hashing. We show that both methods can be tuned to provide good performance for a particular workload (within a broad range of workloads), and we discuss the tradeoffs between the two data structures. As a side effect of our work, we show that grid files are more broadly applicable than previously thought; inparticular, we show that by varying the policies used to construct the grid file we can provide good performance for a wide range of workloads even when storing highly skewed data. Anthony Tomasic, Luis Gravano, Calvin Lue, Peter M. Schwarz, Laura M. Haas |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 3 |