Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Calvin Lue

dblp:71/1204 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Indexing and storage engines · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
distributed information retrieval
0.011997
Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997
Indexing and storage engines › multidimensional indexing
grid file
0.011997
Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
resource selection
0.011997
Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997
Indexing and storage engines
synopsis structure
0.011997
Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1997
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Data Structures for Efficient Broker Implementation
abstract
With the profusion of text databases on the Internet, it is becoming increasingly hard to find the most useful databases for a given query. To attack this problem, several existing and proposed systems employ brokers to direct user queries, using a local database of summary information about the available databases. This summary information must effectively distinguish relevant databases and must be compact while allowing efficient access. We offer evidence that one broker, GlOSS , can be effective at locating databases of interest even in a system of hundreds of databased and can examine the performance of accessing the GlOSS summeries for two promising storage methods: the grid file and partitioned hashing. We show that both methods can be tuned to provide good performance for a particular workload (within a broad range of workloads), and we discuss the tradeoffs between the two data structures. As a side effect of our work, we show that grid files are more broadly applicable than previously thought; inparticular, we show that by varying the policies used to construct the grid file we can provide good performance for a wide range of workloads even when storing highly skewed data.
Anthony Tomasic, Luis Gravano, Calvin Lue, Peter M. Schwarz, Laura M. Haas
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.3