Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rose Pajerski

dblp:71/1516 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software maintenance and evolution · 66% Empirical software engineering · 18% Requirements engineering and software design · 15%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement
0.022002
Lessons learned from 25 years of process improvement: the rise and fall of the NASA software engineering laboratory · ICSE 2002
The Software Engineering Laboratory: An Operational Software Experience Factory · ICSE 1992
Empirical software engineering
software engineering practice
0.012002
Lessons learned from 25 years of process improvement: the rise and fall of the NASA software engineering laboratory · ICSE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software experience factory
0.011992
The Software Engineering Laboratory: An Operational Software Experience Factory · ICSE 1992
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Lessons learned from 25 years of process improvement: the rise and fall of the NASA software engineering laboratory
abstract
For 25 years the NASA/GSFC Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) has been a major resource in software process improvement activities. But due to a changing climate at NASA, agency reorganization, and budget cuts, the SEL has lost much of its impact. In this paper we describe the history of the SEL and give some lessons learned on what we did right, what we did wrong, and what others can learn from our experiences. We briefly describe the research that was conducted by the SEL, describe how we evolved our understanding of software process improvement, and provide a set of lessons learned and hypotheses that should enable future groups to learn from and improve on our quarter century of experiences.
Victor R. Basili, Frank E. McGarry, Rose Pajerski, Marvin V. Zelkowitz
ICSE3
1992 The Software Engineering Laboratory: An Operational Software Experience Factory
abstract
Article Free Access Share on The software engineering laboratory: an operational software experience factory Authors: Victor Basili View Profile , Gianluigi Caldiera View Profile , Frank McGarry View Profile , Rose Pajerski View Profile , Gerald Page View Profile , Sharon Waligora View Profile Authors Info & Claims ICSE '92: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineeringJune 1992 Pages 370–381https://doi.org/10.1145/143062.143154Online:01 June 1992Publication History 50citation892DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations50Total Downloads892Last 12 Months30Last 6 weeks5 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Victor R. Basili, Gianluigi Caldiera, Frank E. McGarry, Rose Pajerski, Gerald T. Page, Sharon Waligora
ICSE4